Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #106587

Closed
wants to merge 20 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

SUPERCILEX and others added 20 commits October 15, 2022 19:13
Signed-off-by: Alex Saveau <saveau.alexandre@gmail.com>
…macro, r=dtolnay

Stabilize `::{core,std}::pin::pin!`

As discussed [over here](rust-lang#93178 (comment)), it looks like a decent time to stabilize the `pin!` macro.

### Public API

```rust
// in module `core::pin`

/// API: `fn pin<T>($value: T) -> Pin<&'local mut T>`
pub macro pin($value:expr $(,)?) {
    …
}
```

  - Tracking issue: rust-lang#93178

(now all this needs is an FCP by the proper team?)
…-diag, r=compiler-errors

Suggest `mut self: &mut Self` for `?Sized` impls

Closes rust-lang#106325
Closes rust-lang#93078

The suggestion is _probably_ not what the user wants (hence `MaybeIncorrect`) but at least makes the problem in the above issues clearer. It might be better to add a note explaining why this is the case, but I'm not sure how best to word that so this is a start.

`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics
Adjust comments about pre-push.sh hook

Follow-up to rust-lang#101175.
…al-item, r=notriddle

jsondoclint: Check local items in `paths` are also in `index`.

Would have caught rust-lang#104064 (if core.json was linted in CI).

Closes rust-lang#106433.

r? rustdoc
…aumeGomez

Add some UI tests and reword error-code docs

Added UI tests for `E0013` and `E0015`. Error code docs for `E0015` were a bit unclear (they referred to all non-const errors in const context, when only non-const functions applied), so I touched them up a bit.

I also fixed up some issues in the new `error_codes.rs` tidy check (linked rust-lang#106341), that I overlooked previously.

r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
…k-Simulacrum

Clarify examples for `VecDeque::get/get_mut`

Closes rust-lang#106114

`@rustbot` label +A-docs
…errors

remove unreachable error code `E0313`

Fixes rust-lang#103742
Makes rust-lang#103433 redundant

Implements removal of `E0313`. I agree with the linked issue that this error code is unreachable but if someone could confirm that would be great, are crater runs done for this sort of thing?

Also removed a redundant `// ignore-tidy-filelength` that I found while reading code.

cc `@GuillaumeGomez` rust-lang#61137
…r-errors

Do not emit wrong E0308 suggestion for closure mismatch

Found in rust-lang#76353.
@rustbot rustbot added T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jan 8, 2023
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=9

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 8, 2023

📌 Commit 6375c2e has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 8, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
configure: rust.debug-assertions := True
configure: rust.overflow-checks := True
configure: llvm.assertions      := True
configure: dist.missing-tools   := True
configure: build.configure-args := ['--enable-sccache', '--disable-manage-submodu ...
configure: writing `config.toml` in current directory
configure: 
configure: run `python /checkout/x.py --help`
Attempting with retry: make prepare
---
...................i.................................................................... 3960/3987
...........................
failures:

---- src/pin.rs - pin::Pin<P>::new_unchecked (line 626) stdout ----
error: the feature `pin_macro` has been stable since 1.67.0-beta.3 and no longer requires an attribute to enable
  |
  |
3 | #![feature(pin_macro)]
  |
note: the lint level is defined here
 --> src/pin.rs:624:9
  |
---
    src/pin.rs - pin::Pin<P>::new_unchecked (line 626)

test result: FAILED. 3950 passed; 1 failed; 36 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 52.07s

error: doctest failed, to rerun pass `-p core --doc`

@JohnTitor JohnTitor closed this Jan 8, 2023
@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the rollup-fbofzxj branch January 8, 2023 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.