Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates for new release #247

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 11, 2021
Merged

Updates for new release #247

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 11, 2021

Conversation

ycphs
Copy link
Owner

@ycphs ycphs commented Aug 24, 2021

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 29, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #247 (8fcf0ec) into master (1fa10d1) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #247   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.70%   67.70%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines        8897     8897           
=======================================
  Hits         6024     6024           
  Misses       2873     2873           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
R/writeData.R 88.33% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1fa10d1...8fcf0ec. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JanMarvin JanMarvin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ups, did not realize that master was wrong 🤦

@JanMarvin
Copy link
Collaborator

Restored the correct version. Think we're good to go! (IMHO the pending PRs can wait.)

@JanMarvin
Copy link
Collaborator

We might wanna disable pkgdown for pull requests, the bot pushes everything to the live page. Therefore 4.2.5 is on the pkgdown site.

@ycphs
Copy link
Owner Author

ycphs commented Sep 9, 2021

@JanMarvin

Yes that's a good idea.

@JanMarvin
Copy link
Collaborator

@ycphs I know you're busy and it's still a bloody pandemic, but can we please get this released until Christmas? It's been a long time in the making. Otherwise I will draft a release on github and continue with a new version number afterwards, if that's fine for you. There are still a few pull requests pending and I'd like to have some in the next release and the others are all not crucial.

@ycphs
Copy link
Owner Author

ycphs commented Dec 10, 2021

Yes a release before Christmas sounds good. @JanMarvin and @jmbarbone thank you for the work in the last month.

Should we merge the open PRs? @JanMarvin it would be great, if you could draft the release. That would make it much easier for me.

@JanMarvin
Copy link
Collaborator

From my point of view, master is ready to be the new release. We merge this pull request with minor changes to the NEWs and Description and we're fine. Regarding the pull requests, I'm not sure about the state of #213 . My open pull requests #291 and #297 should be merged after the release (from my point of view we are to late in the release window and they modify some of the rusty internals of openxlsx). #301 and #302 are still drafts.

@JanMarvin
Copy link
Collaborator

I have rebased this branch on master and pushed. Once the CI approves, it can be merged and released. Not sure if we need anything specific in the release notes, maybe copy the section from NEWS?

@JanMarvin JanMarvin merged commit a403e72 into master Dec 11, 2021
@JanMarvin
Copy link
Collaborator

Merged and created a release. I have attached the R tar file. All that remains is pushing that thing to CRAN and well the pleasure of working with their responses.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants