Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prevents delegate role name as top-level role name #1690

Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions tests/test_metadata_serialization.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -330,6 +330,38 @@ def test_invalid_delegated_role_serialization(self, test_case_data: str):
{"keyids": ["keyid2"], "name": "a", "paths": ["fn3"], "terminating": false, "threshold": 2} \
] \
}',
"using empty string role name": '{"keys": { \
"keyid1" : {"keytype": "rsa", "scheme": "rsassa-pss-sha256", "keyval": {"public": "foo"}}}, \
"roles": [ \
{"keyids": ["keyid1"], "name": "", "terminating": true, "paths": ["fn1"], "threshold": 3}] \
}',
"using root as delegate role name": '{"keys": { \
"keyid1" : {"keytype": "rsa", "scheme": "rsassa-pss-sha256", "keyval": {"public": "foo"}}}, \
"roles": [ \
{"keyids": ["keyid1"], "name": "root", "terminating": true, "paths": ["fn1"], "threshold": 3}] \
}',
"using snapshot as delegate role name": '{"keys": { \
"keyid1" : {"keytype": "rsa", "scheme": "rsassa-pss-sha256", "keyval": {"public": "foo"}}}, \
"roles": [ \
{"keyids": ["keyid1"], "name": "snapshot", "terminating": true, "paths": ["fn1"], "threshold": 3}] \
}',
"using targets as delegate role name": '{"keys": { \
"keyid1" : {"keytype": "rsa", "scheme": "rsassa-pss-sha256", "keyval": {"public": "foo"}}}, \
"roles": [ \
{"keyids": ["keyid1"], "name": "targets", "terminating": true, "paths": ["fn1"], "threshold": 3}] \
}',
"using timestamp as delegate role name": '{"keys": { \
"keyid1" : {"keytype": "rsa", "scheme": "rsassa-pss-sha256", "keyval": {"public": "foo"}}}, \
"roles": [ \
{"keyids": ["keyid1"], "name": "timestamp", "terminating": true, "paths": ["fn1"], "threshold": 3}] \
}',
"using valid and top-level role name": '{"keys": { \
"keyid1" : {"keytype": "rsa", "scheme": "rsassa-pss-sha256", "keyval": {"public": "foo"}}, \
"keyid2" : {"keytype": "ed25519", "scheme": "ed25519", "keyval": {"public": "bar"}}}, \
"roles": [ \
{"keyids": ["keyid1"], "name": "b", "terminating": true, "paths": ["fn1"], "threshold": 3}, \
{"keyids": ["keyid2"], "name": "root", "terminating": true, "paths": ["fn2"], "threshold": 4} ] \
}',
}

@utils.run_sub_tests_with_dataset(invalid_delegations)
Expand Down
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion tests/test_updater_with_simulator.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ def test_targets(self, test_case_data: Tuple[str, bytes, str]):
def test_fishy_rolenames(self):
roles_to_filenames = {
"../a": "..%2Fa.json",
"": ".json",
".": "..json",
"/": "%2F.json",
"ö": "%C3%B6.json",
Expand Down
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions tuf/api/metadata.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1213,6 +1213,13 @@ def __init__(
unrecognized_fields: Optional[Mapping[str, Any]] = None,
):
self.keys = keys

for role in set(roles):
if not role or role in TOP_LEVEL_ROLE_NAMES:
raise ValueError(
"Delegated roles cannot be empty or use top-level role names"
)
Copy link
Collaborator

@MVrachev MVrachev Nov 24, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You still can write the check as a one-line like this:

Suggested change
for role in set(roles):
if not role or role in TOP_LEVEL_ROLE_NAMES:
raise ValueError(
"Delegated roles cannot be empty or use top-level role names"
)
if any(not role or role in TOP_LEVEL_ROLE_NAMES for role in set(roles)):
raise ValueError(
"Delegated roles cannot be empty or use top-level role names"
)

and I personally prefer it.
@sechkova what do you think?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I had a small talk with @jku, and we came out about making it more readable. I'm open about any option 🙂

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding the check, I agree that separate lines are more readable.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

set() does not seem necessary?


self.roles = roles
self.unrecognized_fields = unrecognized_fields or {}

Expand Down