Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify what tx/rx mean in concurrency docs #31610

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2016

Conversation

Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Not everyone knows this convention. We could just rename the variables in the
example, but since this notation is commonly used it's a good opportunity to
introduce it.

r? @steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2016

📌 Commit 9ec1127 has been approved by steveklabnik

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
…veklabnik

Not everyone knows this convention. We could just rename the variables in the
example, but since this notation is commonly used it's a good opportunity to
introduce it.

r? @steveklabnik
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
…veklabnik

Not everyone knows this convention. We could just rename the variables in the
example, but since this notation is commonly used it's a good opportunity to
introduce it.

r? @steveklabnik
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 9ec1127 into rust-lang:master Feb 14, 2016
@Manishearth Manishearth deleted the doc-clarify-txrx branch December 2, 2016 19:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants