Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automatic Creation of Handles in HW, Adding Getters/Setters (variant support) #1688

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
87 changes: 87 additions & 0 deletions doc/migration.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,3 +75,90 @@ hardware_interface
******************
* ``test_components`` was moved to its own package. Update the dependencies if you are using them. (`#1325 <https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/pull/1325>`_)
* With (`#1683 <https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/pull/1683>`_) the ``rclcpp_lifecycle::State & get_state()`` and ``void set_state(const rclcpp_lifecycle::State & new_state)`` are replaced by ``rclcpp_lifecycle::State & get_lifecycle_state()`` and ``void set_lifecycle_state(const rclcpp_lifecycle::State & new_state)``. This change affects controllers and hardware. This is related to (`#1240 <https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/pull/1240>`_) as variant support introduces ``get_state`` and ``set_state`` methods for setting/getting state of handles.

Adaption of Command-/StateInterfaces
***************************************

* ``Command-/StateInterfaces`` are now created and exported automatically by the framework via the ``on_export_command_interfaces()`` or ``on_export_state_interfaces()`` methods based on the interfaces defined in the ``ros2_control`` XML-tag, which get parsed and the ``InterfaceDescription`` is created accordingly (check the `hardware_info.hpp <https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/tree/{REPOS_FILE_BRANCH}/hardware_interface/include/hardware_interface/hardware_info.hpp>`__). The memory is now allocated in the handle itself.

Migration of Command-/StateInterfaces
-------------------------------------
To adapt to the new way of creating and exporting ``Command-/StateInterfaces`` follow those steps:

1. Delete the ``std::vector<hardware_interface::CommandInterface> export_command_interfaces() override`` and ``std::vector<hardware_interface::StateInterface> export_state_interfaces() override``.
2. Delete allocated memory for any ``Command-/StateInterfaces``, e.g.:

* If you have a ``std::vector<double> hw_commands_;`` for joints' ``CommandInterfaces`` delete the definition and any usage/appearance.
* Wherever you iterated over a state/command or accessed commands like this:

.. code-block:: c++

// states
for (uint i = 0; i < hw_states_.size(); i++)
{
hw_states_[i] = 0;
auto some_state = hw_states_[i];
}

// commands
for (uint i = 0; i < hw_commands_.size(); i++)
{
hw_commands_[i] = 0;
auto some_command = hw_commands_[i];
}

// specific state/command
hw_commands_[x] = hw_states_[y];

replace it with

.. code-block:: c++

// states replace with this
for (const auto & [name, descr] : joint_state_interfaces_)
{
set_state(name, 0.0);
auto some_state = get_state(name);
}

//commands replace with this
for (const auto & [name, descr] : joint_commands_interfaces_)
{
set_command(name, 0.0);
auto some_command = get_command(name);
}

// replace specific state/command, for this you need to store the names which are strings
// somewhere or know them. However be careful since the names are fully qualified names which
// means that the prefix is included for the name: E.g.: prefix/joint_1/velocity
set_command(name_of_command_interface_x, get_state(name_of_state_interface_y));

Migration of unlisted Command-/StateInterfaces not defined in ``ros2_control`` XML-tag
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want some unlisted ``Command-/StateInterfaces`` not included in the ``ros2_control`` XML-tag you can follow those steps:

1. Override the ``virtual std::vector<hardware_interface::InterfaceDescription> export_unlisted_command_interfaces()`` or ``virtual std::vector<hardware_interface::InterfaceDescription> export_unlisted_state_interfaces()``
2. Create the InterfaceDescription for each of the interfaces you want to create in the override ``export_unlisted_command_interfaces()`` or ``export_unlisted_state_interfaces()`` function, add it to a vector and return the vector:

.. code-block:: c++

std::vector<hardware_interface::InterfaceDescription> my_unlisted_interfaces;

InterfaceInfo unlisted_interface;
unlisted_interface.name = "some_unlisted_interface";
unlisted_interface.min = "-5.0";
unlisted_interface.data_type = "double";
my_unlisted_interfaces.push_back(InterfaceDescription(info_.name, unlisted_interface));

return my_unlisted_interfaces;

3. The unlisted interface will then be stored in either the ``unlisted_command_interfaces_`` or ``unlisted_state_interfaces_`` map depending in which function they are created.
4. You can access it like any other interface with the ``get_state(name)``, ``set_state(name, value)``, ``get_command(name)`` or ``set_command(name, value)``. E.g. ``get_state("some_unlisted_interface")``.

Custom export of Command-/StateInterfaces
----------------------------------------------
In case the default implementation (``on_export_command_interfaces()`` or ``on_export_state_interfaces()`` ) for exporting the ``Command-/StateInterfaces`` is not enough you can override them. You should however consider the following things:

* If you want to have unlisted interfaces available you need to call the ``export_unlisted_command_interfaces()`` or ``export_unlisted_state_interfaces()`` and add them to the ``unlisted_command_interfaces_`` or ``unlisted_state_interfaces_``.
* Don't forget to store the created ``Command-/StateInterfaces`` internally as you only return ``std::shared_ptr``s and the resource manager will not provide access to the created ``Command-/StateInterface``s for the hardware. So you must take care of storing them yourself.
* Names must be unique!
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions doc/release_notes.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -111,6 +111,15 @@ joint_limits
************
* Add header to import limits from standard URDF definition (`#1298 <https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/pull/1298>`_)

Adaption of Command-/StateInterfaces
***************************************
Changes from `(PR #1688) <https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/pull/1688>`_ for an overview of related changes and discussion refer to `(PR #1240) <https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/pull/1240>`_.

* ``Command-/StateInterfaces`` are now created and exported automatically by the framework via the ``on_export_command_interfaces()`` or ``on_export_state_interfaces()`` methods based on the interfaces defined in the ``ros2_control`` XML-tag, which gets parsed and the ``InterfaceDescription`` is created accordingly (check the `hardware_info.hpp <https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/tree/{REPOS_FILE_BRANCH}/hardware_interface/include/hardware_interface/hardware_info.hpp>`__).
* The memory for storing the value of a ``Command-/StateInterfaces`` is no longer allocated in the hardware but instead in the ``Command-/StateInterfaces`` itself.
* To access the automatically created ``Command-/StateInterfaces`` we provide the ``std::unordered_map<std::string, InterfaceDescription>``, where the string is the fully qualified name of the interface and the ``InterfaceDescription`` is the configuration of the interface. The ``std::unordered_map<>`` are divided into ``type_state_interfaces_`` and ``type_command_interfaces_`` where type can be: ``joint``, ``sensor``, ``gpio`` and ``unlisted``. E.g. the ``CommandInterfaces`` for all joints can be found in the ``joint_command_interfaces_`` map. The ``unlisted`` includes all interfaces not listed in the ``ros2_control`` XML-tag but were created by overriding the ``export_unlisted_command_interfaces()`` or ``export_unlisted_state_interfaces()`` function by creating some custom ``Command-/StateInterfaces``.


ros2controlcli
**************
* Spawner colours were added to ``list_controllers`` depending upon active or inactive (`#1409 <https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control/pull/1409>`_)
Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions hardware_interface/CMakeLists.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -78,6 +78,11 @@ if(BUILD_TESTING)

ament_add_gmock(test_component_interfaces test/test_component_interfaces.cpp)
target_link_libraries(test_component_interfaces hardware_interface)
ament_target_dependencies(test_component_interfaces ros2_control_test_assets)

ament_add_gmock(test_component_interfaces_custom_export test/test_component_interfaces_custom_export.cpp)
target_link_libraries(test_component_interfaces_custom_export hardware_interface)
ament_target_dependencies(test_component_interfaces_custom_export ros2_control_test_assets)

ament_add_gmock(test_component_parser test/test_component_parser.cpp)
target_link_libraries(test_component_parser hardware_interface)
Expand Down
Loading
Loading