Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug for circuit with selected measurement result #167

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 8, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions doc/source/qip-simulator.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ and computation proceeds. To demonstrate, we continue with our previous circuit:
.. testcode::

from qutip_qip.circuit import CircuitSimulator

sim = CircuitSimulator(qc, state=zero_state)
sim = CircuitSimulator(qc)
sim.initialize(zero_state)

This initializes the simulator object and carries out any pre-computation
required. There are two ways to carry out state evolution with the simulator.
Expand Down
59 changes: 17 additions & 42 deletions src/qutip_qip/circuit/circuit.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -490,30 +490,19 @@ def run(
final_state : Qobj
output state of the circuit run.
"""

if state.isket:
sim = CircuitSimulator(
self,
state,
cbits,
U_list,
measure_results,
"state_vector_simulator",
precompute_unitary,
)
mode = "state_vector_simulator"
elif state.isoper:
sim = CircuitSimulator(
self,
state,
cbits,
U_list,
measure_results,
"density_matrix_simulator",
precompute_unitary,
)
mode = "density_matrix_simulator"
else:
raise TypeError("State is not a ket or a density matrix.")
return sim.run(state, cbits).get_final_states(0)
sim = CircuitSimulator(
self,
U_list,
mode,
precompute_unitary,
)
return sim.run(state, cbits, measure_results).get_final_states(0)

def run_statistics(
self, state, U_list=None, cbits=None, precompute_unitary=False
Expand All @@ -530,11 +519,6 @@ def run_statistics(
initialization of the classical bits.
U_list: list of Qobj, optional
list of predefined unitaries corresponding to circuit.
measure_results : tuple of ints, optional
optional specification of each measurement result to enable
post-selection. If specified, the measurement results are
set to the tuple of bits (sequentially) instead of being
chosen at random.
precompute_unitary: Boolean, optional
Specify if computation is done by pre-computing and aggregating
gate unitaries. Possibly a faster method in the case of
Expand All @@ -546,27 +530,18 @@ def run_statistics(
Return a CircuitResult object containing
output states and and their probabilities.
"""

if state.isket:
sim = CircuitSimulator(
self,
state,
cbits,
U_list,
mode="state_vector_simulator",
precompute_unitary=precompute_unitary,
)
mode = "state_vector_simulator"
elif state.isoper:
sim = CircuitSimulator(
self,
state,
cbits,
U_list,
mode="density_matrix_simulator",
precompute_unitary=precompute_unitary,
)
mode = "density_matrix_simulator"
else:
raise TypeError("State is not a ket or a density matrix.")
sim = CircuitSimulator(
self,
U_list,
mode,
precompute_unitary,
)
return sim.run_statistics(state, cbits)

def resolve_gates(self, basis=["CNOT", "RX", "RY", "RZ"]):
Expand Down
27 changes: 11 additions & 16 deletions src/qutip_qip/circuit/circuitsimulator.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
gate_sequence_product,
)
from qutip import basis, ket2dm, Qobj, tensor
import warnings


__all__ = ["CircuitSimulator", "CircuitResult"]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -253,12 +254,12 @@ class CircuitSimulator:
def __init__(
self,
qc,
state=None,
cbits=None,
U_list=None,
measure_results=None,
mode="state_vector_simulator",
precompute_unitary=False,
state=None,
cbits=None,
measure_results=None,
):
"""
Simulate state evolution for Quantum Circuits.
Expand All @@ -268,21 +269,9 @@ def __init__(
qc : :class:`.QubitCircuit`
Quantum Circuit to be simulated.

state: ket or oper
ket or density matrix

cbits: list of int, optional
initial value of classical bits

U_list: list of Qobj, optional
list of predefined unitaries corresponding to circuit.

measure_results : tuple of ints, optional
optional specification of each measurement result to enable
post-selection. If specified, the measurement results are
set to the tuple of bits (sequentially) instead of being
chosen at random.

mode: string, optional
Specify if input state (and therefore computation) is in
state-vector mode or in density matrix mode.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -321,7 +310,13 @@ def __init__(
else:
self._process_ops()

self.initialize(state, cbits, measure_results)
if any(p is not None for p in (state, cbits, measure_results)):
warnings.warn(
"Initializing the quantum state, cbits and measure_results "
"when initializing the simulator is deprecated. "
"The inputs are ignored. "
"They should, instead, be provided when running the simulation."
)

def _process_ops(self):
"""
Expand Down
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions tests/test_circuit.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -575,6 +575,23 @@ def test_measurement_circuit(self):
else:
assert simulator.cbits[0] != simulator.cbits[1]

def test_circuit_with_selected_measurement_result(self):
qc = QubitCircuit(N=1, num_cbits=1)
qc.add_gate("SNOT", targets=0)
qc.add_measurement("M0", targets=0, classical_store=0)

# We reset the random seed so that
# if we don's select the measurement result,
# the two circuit should return the same value.
np.random.seed(0)
final_state = qc.run(qp.basis(2, 0), cbits=[0], measure_results=[0])
fid = pytest.approx(qp.fidelity(final_state, basis(2, 0)))
assert fid == 1.0
np.random.seed(0)
final_state = qc.run(qp.basis(2, 0), cbits=[0], measure_results=[1])
fid = pytest.approx(qp.fidelity(final_state, basis(2, 1)))
assert fid == 1.0

def test_gate_product(self):

filename = "qft.qasm"
Expand Down