Include smallrye-axle-web-client to BOM #1830
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
QS = quickstart I think BOM addition should be added as part of #1816 so the stuff is grouped together |
gsmet
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2019
|
This PR probably also resolves #1733? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Include smallrye-axle-web-client to BOM
This artifact is used in QS, we should have it in the BOM for better user experience and maintenance of QS. Also mentioned in our docs.
There are more smallrye axle/reactive artifacts - https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/io/smallrye/reactive/ Probably for discussion how to handle them in BOM for Q