Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add audio quirks for pang10 #31

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2020
Merged

Add audio quirks for pang10 #31

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2020

Conversation

crawfxrd
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@crawfxrd crawfxrd requested review from a team November 20, 2020 20:25
@leviport
Copy link
Member

I'm still not seeing the prompt appear with this installed. I think the call has to be added in system76-driver, right?

@jackpot51
Copy link
Member

@leviport it ought to be showing up without any change to system76-driver, unless it requires a different fixup

leviport
leviport requested changes Nov 25, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@leviport leviport left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it requires a different fixup then.

leviport
leviport approved these changes Nov 25, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@leviport leviport left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works on pang10 and galp5. As long as you're satisfied with it on lemp10, I'm happy.

@jacobgkau
Copy link
Member

Works on lemp10 as well.

@jackpot51 jackpot51 merged commit 61c3910 into master_groovy Nov 25, 2020
@jackpot51 jackpot51 deleted the pang10_groovy branch November 25, 2020 21:21
jackpot51 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2021
@anakryiko
selftests/bpf: Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro
53b39e2 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929455

[ Upstream commit 0f20615 ]

Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable
bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can
confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds
to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be
wrong.

After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth
documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation
interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as
barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and
will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in
the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original
field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *),
*(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using
barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to
calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of
switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load.

Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code
before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests.

BEFORE
=====
 #45: core_reloc: insn #160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #46: core_reloc: insn #167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #47: core_reloc: insn #174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #48: core_reloc: insn #178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #49: core_reloc: insn #182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32

     157:       18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll
     159:       7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1
     160:       b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4
; BYTE_SIZE relocation here                 ^^^
     161:       66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63>
     162:       16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65>
     163:       16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66>
     164:       05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>:
     165:       18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll
     167:       69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8)
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     168:       05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>:
     169:       16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67>
     170:       16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68>
     171:       05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>:
     172:       18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll
     174:       79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8)
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     175:       05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>:
     176:       18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll
     178:       71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8)
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     179:       05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69>

00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>:
     180:       18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll
     182:       61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8)
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>:
     183:       67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32
     184:       b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0
     185:       16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71>
     186:       c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32
     187:       05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72>

00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>:
     188:       77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32

AFTER
=====

 #30: core_reloc: insn #132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32
 #31: core_reloc: insn #134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32

     129:       18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll
     131:       7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1
     132:       b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8
; BYTE_OFFSET relo here                     ^^^
; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions
     133:       0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1
     134:       b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4
; BYTE_SIZE relocation here                 ^^^
     135:       66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63>
     136:       16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65>
     137:       16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66>
     138:       05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>:
     139:       69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0)
; NO CO-RE relocation here                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     140:       05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>:
     141:       16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67>
     142:       16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68>
     143:       05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>:
     144:       79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0)
; NO CO-RE relocation here                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     145:       05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69>

0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>:
     146:       71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0)
; NO CO-RE relocation here                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     147:       05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69>

00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>:
     148:       61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0)
; NO CO-RE relocation here                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>:
     149:       67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32
     150:       b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0
     151:       16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71>
     152:       c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32
     153:       05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72>

00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>:
     154:       77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323

Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kelsey Skunberg <kelsey.skunberg@canonical.com>
jackpot51 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2021
@ZheyuMa @gregkh
tty: serial: jsm: hold port lock when reporting modem line changes
8eac68d 
[ Upstream commit 240e126 ]

uart_handle_dcd_change() requires a port lock to be held and will emit a
warning when lockdep is enabled.

Held corresponding lock to fix the following warnings.

[  132.528648] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 11600 at drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3046 uart_handle_dcd_change+0xf4/0x120
[  132.530482] Modules linked in:
[  132.531050] CPU: 5 PID: 11600 Comm: jsm Not tainted 5.14.0-rc1-00003-g7fef2edf7cc7-dirty #31
[  132.535268] RIP: 0010:uart_handle_dcd_change+0xf4/0x120
[  132.557100] Call Trace:
[  132.557562]  ? __free_pages+0x83/0xb0
[  132.558213]  neo_parse_modem+0x156/0x220
[  132.558897]  neo_param+0x399/0x840
[  132.559495]  jsm_tty_open+0x12f/0x2d0
[  132.560131]  uart_startup.part.18+0x153/0x340
[  132.560888]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe9/0x140
[  132.561660]  uart_port_activate+0x7f/0xe0
[  132.562351]  ? uart_startup.part.18+0x340/0x340
[  132.563003]  tty_port_open+0x8d/0xf0
[  132.563523]  ? uart_set_options+0x1e0/0x1e0
[  132.564125]  uart_open+0x24/0x40
[  132.564604]  tty_open+0x15c/0x630

Signed-off-by: Zheyu Ma <zheyuma97@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1626242003-3809-1-git-send-email-zheyuma97@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
jackpot51 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2021
@gregkh
selftests/bpf: Fix perf_buffer test on system with offline cpus
c430f62 
[ Upstream commit d412137 ]

The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus:

  # test_progs -t perf_buffer
  test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec
  test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec
  test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
  test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec
  test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec
  test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec
  skipping offline CPU #24
  skipping offline CPU #25
  skipping offline CPU #26
  skipping offline CPU #27
  skipping offline CPU #28
  skipping offline CPU #29
  skipping offline CPU #30
  skipping offline CPU #31
  test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec
  test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec
  test_perf_buffer:FAIL:buf_cnt got 24, expected 32
  Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED

Changing the test to check online cpus instead of possible.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211021114132.8196-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mmstick pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
@dtatulea @gregkh
net/mlx5e: xsk: Fix invalid buffer access for legacy rq
58a113a 
[ Upstream commit e0f5229 ]

The below crash can be encountered when using xdpsock in rx mode for
legacy rq: the buffer gets released in the XDP_REDIRECT path, and then
once again in the driver. This fix sets the flag to avoid releasing on
the driver side.

XSK handling of buffers for legacy rq was relying on the caller to set
the skip release flag. But the referenced fix started using fragment
counts for pages instead of the skip flag.

Crash log:
 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xffff8881217e3a: 0000 [#1] SMP
 CPU: 0 PID: 14 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1+ #31
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
 RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_03b13f331978c78c+0xf/0x28
 Code:  ...
 RSP: 0018:ffff88810082fc98 EFLAGS: 00010246
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888138404901 RCX: c0ffffc900027cbc
 RDX: ffffffffa000b514 RSI: 00ffff8881217e32 RDI: ffff888138404901
 RBP: ffff88810082fc98 R08: 0000000000091100 R09: 0000000000000006
 R10: 0000000000000800 R11: 0000000000000800 R12: ffffc9000027a000
 R13: ffff8881217e2dc0 R14: ffff8881217e2910 R15: ffff8881217e2f00
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88852c800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 0000564cb2e2cde0 CR3: 000000010e603004 CR4: 0000000000370eb0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  ? die_addr+0x32/0x80
  ? exc_general_protection+0x192/0x390
  ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30
  ? 0xffffffffa000b514
  ? bpf_prog_03b13f331978c78c+0xf/0x28
  mlx5e_xdp_handle+0x48/0x670 [mlx5_core]
  ? dev_gro_receive+0x3b5/0x6e0
  mlx5e_xsk_skb_from_cqe_linear+0x6e/0x90 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe+0x55/0x100 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5e_poll_rx_cq+0x87/0x6e0 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5e_napi_poll+0x45e/0x6b0 [mlx5_core]
  __napi_poll+0x25/0x1a0
  net_rx_action+0x28a/0x300
  __do_softirq+0xcd/0x279
  ? sort_range+0x20/0x20
  run_ksoftirqd+0x1a/0x20
  smpboot_thread_fn+0xa2/0x130
  kthread+0xc9/0xf0
  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
  </TASK>
 Modules linked in: mlx5_ib mlx5_core rpcrdma rdma_ucm ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ib_umad rdma_cm ib_ipoib iw_cm ib_cm ib_uverbs ib_core xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xt_addrtype iptable_nat nf_nat br_netfilter overlay zram zsmalloc fuse [last unloaded: mlx5_core]
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fixes: 7abd955 ("net/mlx5e: RX, Fix page_pool page fragment tracking for XDP")
Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jackpot51 jackpot51 jackpot51 approved these changes

@leviport leviport leviport approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@crawfxrd @leviport @jackpot51 @jacobgkau