Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.17] Changing checksum setting to support modes #15662

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport a608fca from #15622.

* Changing checksum setting to support modes

Signed-off-by: Himshikha Gupta <himshikh@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit a608fca)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 3071ec1: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@himshikha
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 3071ec1: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Flaky test #14304

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 3071ec1: null

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

3 similar comments
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 3071ec1: null

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 3071ec1: null

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 3071ec1: null

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 3071ec1: null

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 3071ec1: null

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

✅ Gradle check result for 3071ec1: SUCCESS

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.29412% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.68%. Comparing base (175cbd0) to head (3071ec1).
Report is 4 commits behind head on 2.17.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...arch/gateway/remote/RemoteClusterStateService.java 85.29% 3 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               2.17   #15662      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.66%   71.68%   +0.02%     
+ Complexity    64220    64190      -30     
============================================
  Files          5250     5250              
  Lines        300258   300277      +19     
  Branches      43682    43687       +5     
============================================
+ Hits         215174   215264      +90     
+ Misses        67084    66954     -130     
- Partials      18000    18059      +59     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants