Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changing checksum setting to support modes #15622

Merged

Conversation

himshikha
Copy link
Contributor

@himshikha himshikha commented Sep 3, 2024

Description

This changes the checksum validation setting for remote cluster state to use different modes rather than just enable/disable. Modes added:

  1. None: Validation will be disabled.
  2. Debug: Validation enabled but only matches checksum and logs failing entities.
  3. Trace: Matches checksum and downloads full cluster state to find diff in failing entities. Only logs failures.
  4. Failure: Throws exception on failing validation.

Related Issues

Resolves #[Issue number to be closed when this PR is merged]

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Himshikha Gupta <himshikh@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Himshikha Gupta <himshikh@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for a4c250e: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@himshikha
Copy link
Contributor Author

❌ Gradle check result for a4c250e: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Flaky test #14302, #14294, #14289

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 2c66491: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@himshikha
Copy link
Contributor Author

❌ Gradle check result for 2c66491: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Flaky test #14302, #14294

Copy link
Collaborator

@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 2c66491: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@himshikha
Copy link
Contributor Author

❌ Gradle check result for 2c66491: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Flaky test #14294

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2024

❕ Gradle check result for 3ad0979: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      1 org.opensearch.http.SearchRestCancellationIT.testAutomaticCancellationDuringFetchPhase
      1 org.opensearch.cluster.MinimumClusterManagerNodesIT.testThreeNodesNoClusterManagerBlock
      1 org.opensearch.backwards.MixedClusterClientYamlTestSuiteIT.test {p0=snapshot.status/10_basic/Get missing snapshot status succeeds when ignoreUnavailable is true}

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.29412% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.87%. Comparing base (a60b668) to head (3ad0979).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...arch/gateway/remote/RemoteClusterStateService.java 85.29% 3 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #15622      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     71.93%   71.87%   -0.07%     
- Complexity    63995    64011      +16     
============================================
  Files          5259     5259              
  Lines        299435   299454      +19     
  Branches      43270    43275       +5     
============================================
- Hits         215412   215237     -175     
- Misses        66287    66466     +179     
- Partials      17736    17751      +15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar merged commit a608fca into opensearch-project:main Sep 4, 2024
33 of 34 checks passed
@himshikha himshikha added backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch and removed backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch labels Sep 4, 2024
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Navigate to the root of your repository
cd $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-15622-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 a608fcaefbf046fbc9f177907a14130d769cadda
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-15622-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-15622-to-2.x.

opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
* Changing checksum setting to support modes

Signed-off-by: Himshikha Gupta <himshikh@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit a608fca)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@himshikha himshikha added backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch and removed backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch backport-failed labels Sep 4, 2024
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
* Changing checksum setting to support modes

Signed-off-by: Himshikha Gupta <himshikh@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit a608fca)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Bukhtawar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
* Changing checksum setting to support modes

Signed-off-by: Himshikha Gupta <himshikh@amazon.com>
Bukhtawar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
* Changing checksum setting to support modes

Signed-off-by: Himshikha Gupta <himshikh@amazon.com>
akolarkunnu pushed a commit to akolarkunnu/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2024
* Changing checksum setting to support modes

Signed-off-by: Himshikha Gupta <himshikh@amazon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants