BeagleBone configuration from Cape EEPROM #2

modmaker · 2012-05-13T18:51:19Z

These patches implement BeagleBone I/O initialization based on the contents of the Cape EEPROM.
Currently this code is activated for my cape (BEBOPR) only. I didn't activate it for other capes because that may conflict with the device initialization code in the kernel. We'll need a scheme to overcome this!

There are also some other fixes included as separate patches, see descriptions.

Signed-off-by: Bas Laarhoven <sjml@xs4all.nl>

… cape for now. Signed-off-by: Bas Laarhoven <sjml@xs4all.nl>

Signed-off-by: Bas Laarhoven <sjml@xs4all.nl>

…ernels.

…mpins field.

…mpatibility with existing programs.

…S block during isolation for migration commit 0bf380b upstream. When isolating for migration, migration starts at the start of a zone which is not necessarily pageblock aligned. Further, it stops isolating when COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages are isolated so migrate_pfn is generally not aligned. This allows isolate_migratepages() to call pfn_to_page() on an invalid PFN which can result in a crash. This was originally reported against a 3.0-based kernel with the following trace in a crash dump. PID: 9902 TASK: d47aecd0 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "memcg_process_s" #0 [d72d3ad0] crash_kexec at c028cfdb #1 [d72d3b24] oops_end at c05c5322 #2 [d72d3b38] __bad_area_nosemaphore at c0227e60 #3 [d72d3bec] bad_area at c0227fb6 #4 [d72d3c00] do_page_fault at c05c72ec #5 [d72d3c80] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: 00000000 EBX: 000c0000 ECX: 00000001 EDX: 00000807 EBP: 000c0000 DS: 007b ESI: 00000001 ES: 007b EDI: f3000a80 GS: 6f50 CS: 0060 EIP: c030b15a ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010002 #6 [d72d3cb4] isolate_migratepages at c030b15a #7 [d72d3d1] zone_watermark_ok at c02d26cb #8 [d72d3d2c] compact_zone at c030b8de #9 [d72d3d68] compact_zone_order at c030bba1 torvalds#10 [d72d3db4] try_to_compact_pages at c030bc84 torvalds#11 [d72d3ddc] __alloc_pages_direct_compact at c02d61e7 torvalds#12 [d72d3e08] __alloc_pages_slowpath at c02d66c7 torvalds#13 [d72d3e78] __alloc_pages_nodemask at c02d6a97 torvalds#14 [d72d3eb8] alloc_pages_vma at c030a845 torvalds#15 [d72d3ed4] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page at c03178eb torvalds#16 [d72d3f00] handle_mm_fault at c02f36c6 torvalds#17 [d72d3f30] do_page_fault at c05c70ed torvalds#18 [d72d3fb0] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: b71ff000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: 00001600 EDX: 00000431 DS: 007b ESI: 08048950 ES: 007b EDI: bfaa3788 SS: 007b ESP: bfaa36e0 EBP: bfaa3828 GS: 6f50 CS: 0073 EIP: 080487c8 ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010202 It was also reported by Herbert van den Bergh against 3.1-based kernel with the following snippet from the console log. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 01c00008 IP: [<c0522399>] isolate_migratepages+0x119/0x390 *pdpt = 000000002f7ce001 *pde = 0000000000000000 It is expected that it also affects 3.2.x and current mainline. The problem is that pfn_valid is only called on the first PFN being checked and that PFN is not necessarily aligned. Lets say we have a case like this H = MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary | = pageblock boundary m = cc->migrate_pfn f = cc->free_pfn o = memory hole H------|------H------|----m-Hoooooo|ooooooH-f----|------H The migrate_pfn is just below a memory hole and the free scanner is beyond the hole. When isolate_migratepages started, it scans from migrate_pfn to migrate_pfn+pageblock_nr_pages which is now in a memory hole. It checks pfn_valid() on the first PFN but then scans into the hole where there are not necessarily valid struct pages. This patch ensures that isolate_migratepages calls pfn_valid when necessary. Reported-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Tested-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

koenkooi · 2012-05-21T08:16:45Z

I merged them into the patch script: beagleboard/kernel@6fa43bc

…S block during isolation for migration commit 0bf380b upstream. When isolating for migration, migration starts at the start of a zone which is not necessarily pageblock aligned. Further, it stops isolating when COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages are isolated so migrate_pfn is generally not aligned. This allows isolate_migratepages() to call pfn_to_page() on an invalid PFN which can result in a crash. This was originally reported against a 3.0-based kernel with the following trace in a crash dump. PID: 9902 TASK: d47aecd0 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "memcg_process_s" #0 [d72d3ad0] crash_kexec at c028cfdb #1 [d72d3b24] oops_end at c05c5322 #2 [d72d3b38] __bad_area_nosemaphore at c0227e60 #3 [d72d3bec] bad_area at c0227fb6 #4 [d72d3c00] do_page_fault at c05c72ec #5 [d72d3c80] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: 00000000 EBX: 000c0000 ECX: 00000001 EDX: 00000807 EBP: 000c0000 DS: 007b ESI: 00000001 ES: 007b EDI: f3000a80 GS: 6f50 CS: 0060 EIP: c030b15a ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010002 #6 [d72d3cb4] isolate_migratepages at c030b15a #7 [d72d3d1] zone_watermark_ok at c02d26cb #8 [d72d3d2c] compact_zone at c030b8de #9 [d72d3d68] compact_zone_order at c030bba1 torvalds#10 [d72d3db4] try_to_compact_pages at c030bc84 torvalds#11 [d72d3ddc] __alloc_pages_direct_compact at c02d61e7 torvalds#12 [d72d3e08] __alloc_pages_slowpath at c02d66c7 torvalds#13 [d72d3e78] __alloc_pages_nodemask at c02d6a97 torvalds#14 [d72d3eb8] alloc_pages_vma at c030a845 torvalds#15 [d72d3ed4] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page at c03178eb torvalds#16 [d72d3f00] handle_mm_fault at c02f36c6 torvalds#17 [d72d3f30] do_page_fault at c05c70ed torvalds#18 [d72d3fb0] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: b71ff000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: 00001600 EDX: 00000431 DS: 007b ESI: 08048950 ES: 007b EDI: bfaa3788 SS: 007b ESP: bfaa36e0 EBP: bfaa3828 GS: 6f50 CS: 0073 EIP: 080487c8 ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010202 It was also reported by Herbert van den Bergh against 3.1-based kernel with the following snippet from the console log. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 01c00008 IP: [<c0522399>] isolate_migratepages+0x119/0x390 *pdpt = 000000002f7ce001 *pde = 0000000000000000 It is expected that it also affects 3.2.x and current mainline. The problem is that pfn_valid is only called on the first PFN being checked and that PFN is not necessarily aligned. Lets say we have a case like this H = MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary | = pageblock boundary m = cc->migrate_pfn f = cc->free_pfn o = memory hole H------|------H------|----m-Hoooooo|ooooooH-f----|------H The migrate_pfn is just below a memory hole and the free scanner is beyond the hole. When isolate_migratepages started, it scans from migrate_pfn to migrate_pfn+pageblock_nr_pages which is now in a memory hole. It checks pfn_valid() on the first PFN but then scans into the hole where there are not necessarily valid struct pages. This patch ensures that isolate_migratepages calls pfn_valid when necessary. Reported-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Tested-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit b704871 upstream. coretemp tries to access core_data array beyond bounds on cpu unplug if core id of the cpu if more than NUM_REAL_CORES-1. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000013c IP: [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] PGD 673e5a067 PUD 66e9b3067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU 79 Modules linked in: sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf bnep bluetooth rfkill ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6_tables xt_state nf_conntrack coretemp crc32c_intel asix tpm_tis pcspkr usbnet iTCO_wdt i2c_i801 microcode mii joydev tpm i2c_core iTCO_vendor_support tpm_bios i7core_edac igb ioatdma edac_core dca megaraid_sas [last unloaded: oprofile] Pid: 3315, comm: set-cpus Tainted: G W 3.4.0-rc5+ #2 QCI QSSC-S4R/QSSC-S4R RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00159af>] [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] RSP: 0018:ffff880472fb3d48 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000124 RBX: 0000000000000034 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: 0000000000000246 RBP: ffff880472fb3d88 R08: ffff88077fcd36c0 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffffffff8184bc48 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880273095800 R13: 0000000000000013 R14: ffff8802730a1810 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f694a20f720(0000) GS:ffff88077fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 000000000000013c CR3: 000000067209b000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process set-cpus (pid: 3315, threadinfo ffff880472fb2000, task ffff880471fa0000) Stack: ffff880277b4c308 0000000000000003 ffff880472fb3d88 0000000000000005 0000000000000034 00000000ffffffd1 ffffffff81cadc70 ffff880472fb3e14 ffff880472fb3dc8 ffffffff8161f48d ffff880471fa0000 0000000000000034 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8161f48d>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 [<ffffffff8107f1be>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff81059d30>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x40 [<ffffffff815fa251>] _cpu_down+0x81/0x270 [<ffffffff815fa477>] cpu_down+0x37/0x50 [<ffffffff815fd6a3>] store_online+0x63/0xc0 [<ffffffff813c7078>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [<ffffffff811f02cf>] sysfs_write_file+0xef/0x170 [<ffffffff81180443>] vfs_write+0xb3/0x180 [<ffffffff8118076a>] sys_write+0x4a/0x90 [<ffffffff816236a9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: 48 c7 c7 94 60 01 a0 44 0f b7 ac 10 ac 00 00 00 31 c0 e8 41 b7 5f e1 41 83 c5 02 49 63 c5 49 8b 44 c4 10 48 85 c0 74 56 45 31 ff <39> 58 18 75 4e eb 1f 49 63 d7 4c 89 f7 48 89 45 c8 48 6b d2 28 RIP [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] RSP <ffff880472fb3d48> CR2: 000000000000013c Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

…S block during isolation for migration commit 0bf380b upstream. When isolating for migration, migration starts at the start of a zone which is not necessarily pageblock aligned. Further, it stops isolating when COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages are isolated so migrate_pfn is generally not aligned. This allows isolate_migratepages() to call pfn_to_page() on an invalid PFN which can result in a crash. This was originally reported against a 3.0-based kernel with the following trace in a crash dump. PID: 9902 TASK: d47aecd0 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "memcg_process_s" #0 [d72d3ad0] crash_kexec at c028cfdb #1 [d72d3b24] oops_end at c05c5322 #2 [d72d3b38] __bad_area_nosemaphore at c0227e60 #3 [d72d3bec] bad_area at c0227fb6 #4 [d72d3c00] do_page_fault at c05c72ec #5 [d72d3c80] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: 00000000 EBX: 000c0000 ECX: 00000001 EDX: 00000807 EBP: 000c0000 DS: 007b ESI: 00000001 ES: 007b EDI: f3000a80 GS: 6f50 CS: 0060 EIP: c030b15a ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010002 #6 [d72d3cb4] isolate_migratepages at c030b15a #7 [d72d3d1] zone_watermark_ok at c02d26cb #8 [d72d3d2c] compact_zone at c030b8de #9 [d72d3d68] compact_zone_order at c030bba1 torvalds#10 [d72d3db4] try_to_compact_pages at c030bc84 torvalds#11 [d72d3ddc] __alloc_pages_direct_compact at c02d61e7 torvalds#12 [d72d3e08] __alloc_pages_slowpath at c02d66c7 torvalds#13 [d72d3e78] __alloc_pages_nodemask at c02d6a97 torvalds#14 [d72d3eb8] alloc_pages_vma at c030a845 torvalds#15 [d72d3ed4] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page at c03178eb torvalds#16 [d72d3f00] handle_mm_fault at c02f36c6 torvalds#17 [d72d3f30] do_page_fault at c05c70ed torvalds#18 [d72d3fb0] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: b71ff000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: 00001600 EDX: 00000431 DS: 007b ESI: 08048950 ES: 007b EDI: bfaa3788 SS: 007b ESP: bfaa36e0 EBP: bfaa3828 GS: 6f50 CS: 0073 EIP: 080487c8 ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010202 It was also reported by Herbert van den Bergh against 3.1-based kernel with the following snippet from the console log. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 01c00008 IP: [<c0522399>] isolate_migratepages+0x119/0x390 *pdpt = 000000002f7ce001 *pde = 0000000000000000 It is expected that it also affects 3.2.x and current mainline. The problem is that pfn_valid is only called on the first PFN being checked and that PFN is not necessarily aligned. Lets say we have a case like this H = MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary | = pageblock boundary m = cc->migrate_pfn f = cc->free_pfn o = memory hole H------|------H------|----m-Hoooooo|ooooooH-f----|------H The migrate_pfn is just below a memory hole and the free scanner is beyond the hole. When isolate_migratepages started, it scans from migrate_pfn to migrate_pfn+pageblock_nr_pages which is now in a memory hole. It checks pfn_valid() on the first PFN but then scans into the hole where there are not necessarily valid struct pages. This patch ensures that isolate_migratepages calls pfn_valid when necessary. Reported-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Tested-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit b704871 upstream. coretemp tries to access core_data array beyond bounds on cpu unplug if core id of the cpu if more than NUM_REAL_CORES-1. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000013c IP: [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] PGD 673e5a067 PUD 66e9b3067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU 79 Modules linked in: sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf bnep bluetooth rfkill ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6_tables xt_state nf_conntrack coretemp crc32c_intel asix tpm_tis pcspkr usbnet iTCO_wdt i2c_i801 microcode mii joydev tpm i2c_core iTCO_vendor_support tpm_bios i7core_edac igb ioatdma edac_core dca megaraid_sas [last unloaded: oprofile] Pid: 3315, comm: set-cpus Tainted: G W 3.4.0-rc5+ #2 QCI QSSC-S4R/QSSC-S4R RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00159af>] [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] RSP: 0018:ffff880472fb3d48 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000124 RBX: 0000000000000034 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: 0000000000000246 RBP: ffff880472fb3d88 R08: ffff88077fcd36c0 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffffffff8184bc48 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880273095800 R13: 0000000000000013 R14: ffff8802730a1810 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f694a20f720(0000) GS:ffff88077fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 000000000000013c CR3: 000000067209b000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process set-cpus (pid: 3315, threadinfo ffff880472fb2000, task ffff880471fa0000) Stack: ffff880277b4c308 0000000000000003 ffff880472fb3d88 0000000000000005 0000000000000034 00000000ffffffd1 ffffffff81cadc70 ffff880472fb3e14 ffff880472fb3dc8 ffffffff8161f48d ffff880471fa0000 0000000000000034 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8161f48d>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 [<ffffffff8107f1be>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff81059d30>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x40 [<ffffffff815fa251>] _cpu_down+0x81/0x270 [<ffffffff815fa477>] cpu_down+0x37/0x50 [<ffffffff815fd6a3>] store_online+0x63/0xc0 [<ffffffff813c7078>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [<ffffffff811f02cf>] sysfs_write_file+0xef/0x170 [<ffffffff81180443>] vfs_write+0xb3/0x180 [<ffffffff8118076a>] sys_write+0x4a/0x90 [<ffffffff816236a9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: 48 c7 c7 94 60 01 a0 44 0f b7 ac 10 ac 00 00 00 31 c0 e8 41 b7 5f e1 41 83 c5 02 49 63 c5 49 8b 44 c4 10 48 85 c0 74 56 45 31 ff <39> 58 18 75 4e eb 1f 49 63 d7 4c 89 f7 48 89 45 c8 48 6b d2 28 RIP [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] RSP <ffff880472fb3d48> CR2: 000000000000013c Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

…S block during isolation for migration commit 0bf380b upstream. When isolating for migration, migration starts at the start of a zone which is not necessarily pageblock aligned. Further, it stops isolating when COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages are isolated so migrate_pfn is generally not aligned. This allows isolate_migratepages() to call pfn_to_page() on an invalid PFN which can result in a crash. This was originally reported against a 3.0-based kernel with the following trace in a crash dump. PID: 9902 TASK: d47aecd0 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "memcg_process_s" #0 [d72d3ad0] crash_kexec at c028cfdb #1 [d72d3b24] oops_end at c05c5322 #2 [d72d3b38] __bad_area_nosemaphore at c0227e60 #3 [d72d3bec] bad_area at c0227fb6 #4 [d72d3c00] do_page_fault at c05c72ec #5 [d72d3c80] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: 00000000 EBX: 000c0000 ECX: 00000001 EDX: 00000807 EBP: 000c0000 DS: 007b ESI: 00000001 ES: 007b EDI: f3000a80 GS: 6f50 CS: 0060 EIP: c030b15a ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010002 #6 [d72d3cb4] isolate_migratepages at c030b15a #7 [d72d3d1] zone_watermark_ok at c02d26cb #8 [d72d3d2c] compact_zone at c030b8de #9 [d72d3d68] compact_zone_order at c030bba1 torvalds#10 [d72d3db4] try_to_compact_pages at c030bc84 torvalds#11 [d72d3ddc] __alloc_pages_direct_compact at c02d61e7 torvalds#12 [d72d3e08] __alloc_pages_slowpath at c02d66c7 torvalds#13 [d72d3e78] __alloc_pages_nodemask at c02d6a97 torvalds#14 [d72d3eb8] alloc_pages_vma at c030a845 torvalds#15 [d72d3ed4] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page at c03178eb torvalds#16 [d72d3f00] handle_mm_fault at c02f36c6 torvalds#17 [d72d3f30] do_page_fault at c05c70ed torvalds#18 [d72d3fb0] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: b71ff000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: 00001600 EDX: 00000431 DS: 007b ESI: 08048950 ES: 007b EDI: bfaa3788 SS: 007b ESP: bfaa36e0 EBP: bfaa3828 GS: 6f50 CS: 0073 EIP: 080487c8 ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010202 It was also reported by Herbert van den Bergh against 3.1-based kernel with the following snippet from the console log. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 01c00008 IP: [<c0522399>] isolate_migratepages+0x119/0x390 *pdpt = 000000002f7ce001 *pde = 0000000000000000 It is expected that it also affects 3.2.x and current mainline. The problem is that pfn_valid is only called on the first PFN being checked and that PFN is not necessarily aligned. Lets say we have a case like this H = MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary | = pageblock boundary m = cc->migrate_pfn f = cc->free_pfn o = memory hole H------|------H------|----m-Hoooooo|ooooooH-f----|------H The migrate_pfn is just below a memory hole and the free scanner is beyond the hole. When isolate_migratepages started, it scans from migrate_pfn to migrate_pfn+pageblock_nr_pages which is now in a memory hole. It checks pfn_valid() on the first PFN but then scans into the hole where there are not necessarily valid struct pages. This patch ensures that isolate_migratepages calls pfn_valid when necessary. Reported-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Tested-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit b704871 upstream. coretemp tries to access core_data array beyond bounds on cpu unplug if core id of the cpu if more than NUM_REAL_CORES-1. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000013c IP: [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] PGD 673e5a067 PUD 66e9b3067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU 79 Modules linked in: sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf bnep bluetooth rfkill ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6_tables xt_state nf_conntrack coretemp crc32c_intel asix tpm_tis pcspkr usbnet iTCO_wdt i2c_i801 microcode mii joydev tpm i2c_core iTCO_vendor_support tpm_bios i7core_edac igb ioatdma edac_core dca megaraid_sas [last unloaded: oprofile] Pid: 3315, comm: set-cpus Tainted: G W 3.4.0-rc5+ #2 QCI QSSC-S4R/QSSC-S4R RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00159af>] [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] RSP: 0018:ffff880472fb3d48 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000124 RBX: 0000000000000034 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: 0000000000000246 RBP: ffff880472fb3d88 R08: ffff88077fcd36c0 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffffffff8184bc48 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880273095800 R13: 0000000000000013 R14: ffff8802730a1810 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f694a20f720(0000) GS:ffff88077fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 000000000000013c CR3: 000000067209b000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process set-cpus (pid: 3315, threadinfo ffff880472fb2000, task ffff880471fa0000) Stack: ffff880277b4c308 0000000000000003 ffff880472fb3d88 0000000000000005 0000000000000034 00000000ffffffd1 ffffffff81cadc70 ffff880472fb3e14 ffff880472fb3dc8 ffffffff8161f48d ffff880471fa0000 0000000000000034 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8161f48d>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 [<ffffffff8107f1be>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff81059d30>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x40 [<ffffffff815fa251>] _cpu_down+0x81/0x270 [<ffffffff815fa477>] cpu_down+0x37/0x50 [<ffffffff815fd6a3>] store_online+0x63/0xc0 [<ffffffff813c7078>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [<ffffffff811f02cf>] sysfs_write_file+0xef/0x170 [<ffffffff81180443>] vfs_write+0xb3/0x180 [<ffffffff8118076a>] sys_write+0x4a/0x90 [<ffffffff816236a9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: 48 c7 c7 94 60 01 a0 44 0f b7 ac 10 ac 00 00 00 31 c0 e8 41 b7 5f e1 41 83 c5 02 49 63 c5 49 8b 44 c4 10 48 85 c0 74 56 45 31 ff <39> 58 18 75 4e eb 1f 49 63 d7 4c 89 f7 48 89 45 c8 48 6b d2 28 RIP [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] RSP <ffff880472fb3d48> CR2: 000000000000013c Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

…S block during isolation for migration commit 0bf380b upstream. When isolating for migration, migration starts at the start of a zone which is not necessarily pageblock aligned. Further, it stops isolating when COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages are isolated so migrate_pfn is generally not aligned. This allows isolate_migratepages() to call pfn_to_page() on an invalid PFN which can result in a crash. This was originally reported against a 3.0-based kernel with the following trace in a crash dump. PID: 9902 TASK: d47aecd0 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "memcg_process_s" #0 [d72d3ad0] crash_kexec at c028cfdb #1 [d72d3b24] oops_end at c05c5322 #2 [d72d3b38] __bad_area_nosemaphore at c0227e60 #3 [d72d3bec] bad_area at c0227fb6 #4 [d72d3c00] do_page_fault at c05c72ec #5 [d72d3c80] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: 00000000 EBX: 000c0000 ECX: 00000001 EDX: 00000807 EBP: 000c0000 DS: 007b ESI: 00000001 ES: 007b EDI: f3000a80 GS: 6f50 CS: 0060 EIP: c030b15a ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010002 #6 [d72d3cb4] isolate_migratepages at c030b15a #7 [d72d3d1] zone_watermark_ok at c02d26cb #8 [d72d3d2c] compact_zone at c030b8de #9 [d72d3d68] compact_zone_order at c030bba1 torvalds#10 [d72d3db4] try_to_compact_pages at c030bc84 torvalds#11 [d72d3ddc] __alloc_pages_direct_compact at c02d61e7 torvalds#12 [d72d3e08] __alloc_pages_slowpath at c02d66c7 torvalds#13 [d72d3e78] __alloc_pages_nodemask at c02d6a97 torvalds#14 [d72d3eb8] alloc_pages_vma at c030a845 torvalds#15 [d72d3ed4] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page at c03178eb torvalds#16 [d72d3f00] handle_mm_fault at c02f36c6 torvalds#17 [d72d3f30] do_page_fault at c05c70ed torvalds#18 [d72d3fb0] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: b71ff000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: 00001600 EDX: 00000431 DS: 007b ESI: 08048950 ES: 007b EDI: bfaa3788 SS: 007b ESP: bfaa36e0 EBP: bfaa3828 GS: 6f50 CS: 0073 EIP: 080487c8 ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010202 It was also reported by Herbert van den Bergh against 3.1-based kernel with the following snippet from the console log. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 01c00008 IP: [<c0522399>] isolate_migratepages+0x119/0x390 *pdpt = 000000002f7ce001 *pde = 0000000000000000 It is expected that it also affects 3.2.x and current mainline. The problem is that pfn_valid is only called on the first PFN being checked and that PFN is not necessarily aligned. Lets say we have a case like this H = MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary | = pageblock boundary m = cc->migrate_pfn f = cc->free_pfn o = memory hole H------|------H------|----m-Hoooooo|ooooooH-f----|------H The migrate_pfn is just below a memory hole and the free scanner is beyond the hole. When isolate_migratepages started, it scans from migrate_pfn to migrate_pfn+pageblock_nr_pages which is now in a memory hole. It checks pfn_valid() on the first PFN but then scans into the hole where there are not necessarily valid struct pages. This patch ensures that isolate_migratepages calls pfn_valid when necessary. Reported-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Tested-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit b704871 upstream. coretemp tries to access core_data array beyond bounds on cpu unplug if core id of the cpu if more than NUM_REAL_CORES-1. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000013c IP: [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] PGD 673e5a067 PUD 66e9b3067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU 79 Modules linked in: sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf bnep bluetooth rfkill ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip6_tables xt_state nf_conntrack coretemp crc32c_intel asix tpm_tis pcspkr usbnet iTCO_wdt i2c_i801 microcode mii joydev tpm i2c_core iTCO_vendor_support tpm_bios i7core_edac igb ioatdma edac_core dca megaraid_sas [last unloaded: oprofile] Pid: 3315, comm: set-cpus Tainted: G W 3.4.0-rc5+ #2 QCI QSSC-S4R/QSSC-S4R RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00159af>] [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] RSP: 0018:ffff880472fb3d48 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000124 RBX: 0000000000000034 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: 0000000000000246 RBP: ffff880472fb3d88 R08: ffff88077fcd36c0 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffffffff8184bc48 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880273095800 R13: 0000000000000013 R14: ffff8802730a1810 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f694a20f720(0000) GS:ffff88077fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 000000000000013c CR3: 000000067209b000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process set-cpus (pid: 3315, threadinfo ffff880472fb2000, task ffff880471fa0000) Stack: ffff880277b4c308 0000000000000003 ffff880472fb3d88 0000000000000005 0000000000000034 00000000ffffffd1 ffffffff81cadc70 ffff880472fb3e14 ffff880472fb3dc8 ffffffff8161f48d ffff880471fa0000 0000000000000034 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8161f48d>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70 [<ffffffff8107f1be>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [<ffffffff81059d30>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x40 [<ffffffff815fa251>] _cpu_down+0x81/0x270 [<ffffffff815fa477>] cpu_down+0x37/0x50 [<ffffffff815fd6a3>] store_online+0x63/0xc0 [<ffffffff813c7078>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [<ffffffff811f02cf>] sysfs_write_file+0xef/0x170 [<ffffffff81180443>] vfs_write+0xb3/0x180 [<ffffffff8118076a>] sys_write+0x4a/0x90 [<ffffffff816236a9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: 48 c7 c7 94 60 01 a0 44 0f b7 ac 10 ac 00 00 00 31 c0 e8 41 b7 5f e1 41 83 c5 02 49 63 c5 49 8b 44 c4 10 48 85 c0 74 56 45 31 ff <39> 58 18 75 4e eb 1f 49 63 d7 4c 89 f7 48 89 45 c8 48 6b d2 28 RIP [<ffffffffa00159af>] coretemp_cpu_callback+0x93/0x1ba [coretemp] RSP <ffff880472fb3d48> CR2: 000000000000013c Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

…S block during isolation for migration commit 0bf380b upstream. When isolating for migration, migration starts at the start of a zone which is not necessarily pageblock aligned. Further, it stops isolating when COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX pages are isolated so migrate_pfn is generally not aligned. This allows isolate_migratepages() to call pfn_to_page() on an invalid PFN which can result in a crash. This was originally reported against a 3.0-based kernel with the following trace in a crash dump. PID: 9902 TASK: d47aecd0 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "memcg_process_s" #0 [d72d3ad0] crash_kexec at c028cfdb #1 [d72d3b24] oops_end at c05c5322 #2 [d72d3b38] __bad_area_nosemaphore at c0227e60 #3 [d72d3bec] bad_area at c0227fb6 #4 [d72d3c00] do_page_fault at c05c72ec #5 [d72d3c80] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: 00000000 EBX: 000c0000 ECX: 00000001 EDX: 00000807 EBP: 000c0000 DS: 007b ESI: 00000001 ES: 007b EDI: f3000a80 GS: 6f50 CS: 0060 EIP: c030b15a ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010002 #6 [d72d3cb4] isolate_migratepages at c030b15a #7 [d72d3d1] zone_watermark_ok at c02d26cb #8 [d72d3d2c] compact_zone at c030b8de #9 [d72d3d68] compact_zone_order at c030bba1 torvalds#10 [d72d3db4] try_to_compact_pages at c030bc84 torvalds#11 [d72d3ddc] __alloc_pages_direct_compact at c02d61e7 torvalds#12 [d72d3e08] __alloc_pages_slowpath at c02d66c7 torvalds#13 [d72d3e78] __alloc_pages_nodemask at c02d6a97 torvalds#14 [d72d3eb8] alloc_pages_vma at c030a845 torvalds#15 [d72d3ed4] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page at c03178eb torvalds#16 [d72d3f00] handle_mm_fault at c02f36c6 torvalds#17 [d72d3f30] do_page_fault at c05c70ed torvalds#18 [d72d3fb0] error_code (via page_fault) at c05c47a4 EAX: b71ff000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: 00001600 EDX: 00000431 DS: 007b ESI: 08048950 ES: 007b EDI: bfaa3788 SS: 007b ESP: bfaa36e0 EBP: bfaa3828 GS: 6f50 CS: 0073 EIP: 080487c8 ERR: ffffffff EFLAGS: 00010202 It was also reported by Herbert van den Bergh against 3.1-based kernel with the following snippet from the console log. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 01c00008 IP: [<c0522399>] isolate_migratepages+0x119/0x390 *pdpt = 000000002f7ce001 *pde = 0000000000000000 It is expected that it also affects 3.2.x and current mainline. The problem is that pfn_valid is only called on the first PFN being checked and that PFN is not necessarily aligned. Lets say we have a case like this H = MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary | = pageblock boundary m = cc->migrate_pfn f = cc->free_pfn o = memory hole H------|------H------|----m-Hoooooo|ooooooH-f----|------H The migrate_pfn is just below a memory hole and the free scanner is beyond the hole. When isolate_migratepages started, it scans from migrate_pfn to migrate_pfn+pageblock_nr_pages which is now in a memory hole. It checks pfn_valid() on the first PFN but then scans into the hole where there are not necessarily valid struct pages. This patch ensures that isolate_migratepages calls pfn_valid when necessary. Reported-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Tested-by: Herbert van den Bergh <herbert.van.den.bergh@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit a47bd78 upstream. Dave hit this splat during testing btrfs/078: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc6-default+ #1191 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/75 is trying to acquire lock: ffffa040e9d04ff8 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8b0c8040 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 __kmalloc_track_caller+0x49/0x330 kstrdup+0x2e/0x60 __kernfs_new_node.constprop.0+0x44/0x250 kernfs_new_node+0x25/0x50 kernfs_create_link+0x34/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x65/0x100 [btrfs] btrfs_init_new_device+0x44c/0x12b0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xc3c/0x25c0 [btrfs] ksys_ioctl+0x68/0xa0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x137/0x3e0 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0xb44/0xfb0 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xc1/0x350 [btrfs] alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 [btrfs] __btrfs_cow_block+0x143/0x7a0 [btrfs] btrfs_cow_block+0x15f/0x310 [btrfs] push_leaf_right+0x150/0x240 [btrfs] split_leaf+0x3cd/0x6d0 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xd14/0xf70 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xc0 [btrfs] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xb2/0x840 [btrfs] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x10e/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x2f9/0x650 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x22c/0x600 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x98/0xa20 validate_chain+0xa8c/0x2a00 __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3bf/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x175/0x420 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x192/0x600 balance_pgdat+0x31f/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x510 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/75: #0: ffffffff8b0c8040 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8b0b50b8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0 #2: ffffa040e057c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 75 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc6-default+ #1191 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x16f/0x190 check_prev_add+0x98/0xa20 validate_chain+0xa8c/0x2a00 __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] ? __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x138/0x560 [btrfs] ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x2fe/0x560 [btrfs] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3bf/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x175/0x420 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x192/0x600 balance_pgdat+0x31f/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x510 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x50 ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750 kthread+0x137/0x150 ? kthread_stop+0x2a0/0x2a0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This is because we're holding the chunk_mutex while adding this device and adding its sysfs entries. We actually hold different locks in different places when calling this function, the dev_replace semaphore for instance in dev replace, so instead of moving this call around simply wrap it's operations in NOFS. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

… set [ Upstream commit 1101c87 ] We received an error report that perf-record caused 'Segmentation fault' on a newly system (e.g. on the new installed ubuntu). (gdb) backtrace #0 __read_once_size (size=4, res=<synthetic pointer>, p=0x14) at /root/0-jinyao/acme/tools/include/linux/compiler.h:139 #1 atomic_read (v=0x14) at /root/0-jinyao/acme/tools/include/asm/../../arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:28 #2 refcount_read (r=0x14) at /root/0-jinyao/acme/tools/include/linux/refcount.h:65 #3 perf_mmap__read_init (map=map@entry=0x0) at mmap.c:177 #4 0x0000561ce5c0de39 in perf_evlist__poll_thread (arg=0x561ce68584d0) at util/sideband_evlist.c:62 #5 0x00007fad78491609 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:477 #6 0x00007fad7823c103 in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95 The root cause is, evlist__add_bpf_sb_event() just returns 0 if HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT is not defined (inline function path). So it will not create a valid evsel for side-band event. But perf-record still creates BPF side band thread to process the side-band event, then the error happpens. We can reproduce this issue by removing the libelf-dev. e.g. 1. apt-get remove libelf-dev 2. perf record -a -- sleep 1 root@test:~# ./perf record -a -- sleep 1 perf: Segmentation fault Obtained 6 stack frames. ./perf(+0x28eee8) [0x5562d6ef6ee8] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x46210) [0x7fbfdc65f210] ./perf(+0x342e74) [0x5562d6faae74] ./perf(+0x257e39) [0x5562d6ebfe39] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x9609) [0x7fbfdc990609] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x43) [0x7fbfdc73b103] Segmentation fault (core dumped) To fix this issue, 1. We either install the missing libraries to let HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT be defined. e.g. apt-get install libelf-dev and install other related libraries. 2. Use this patch to skip the side-band event setup if HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT is not set. Committer notes: The side band thread is not used just with BPF, it is also used with --switch-output-event, so narrow the ifdef to the BPF specific part. Fixes: 23cbb41 ("perf record: Move side band evlist setup to separate routine") Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200805022937.29184-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 5a25de6 ] Freeing chip on error may lead to an Oops at the next time the system goes to resume. Fix this by removing all snd_echo_free() calls on error. Fixes: 47b5d02 ("ALSA: Echoaudio - Add suspend support #2") Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200813074632.17022-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit b0f3b87 ] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565 PID: 257 TASK: ecdd0000 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "init" #0 [<c0b420ec>] (__schedule) from [<c0b423c8>] #1 [<c0b423c8>] (schedule) from [<c0b459d4>] #2 [<c0b459d4>] (rwsem_down_read_failed) from [<c0b44fa0>] #3 [<c0b44fa0>] (down_read) from [<c044233c>] #4 [<c044233c>] (f2fs_truncate_blocks) from [<c0442890>] #5 [<c0442890>] (f2fs_truncate) from [<c044d408>] #6 [<c044d408>] (f2fs_evict_inode) from [<c030be18>] #7 [<c030be18>] (evict) from [<c030a558>] #8 [<c030a558>] (iput) from [<c047c600>] #9 [<c047c600>] (f2fs_sync_node_pages) from [<c0465414>] torvalds#10 [<c0465414>] (f2fs_write_checkpoint) from [<c04575f4>] torvalds#11 [<c04575f4>] (f2fs_sync_fs) from [<c0441918>] torvalds#12 [<c0441918>] (f2fs_do_sync_file) from [<c0441098>] torvalds#13 [<c0441098>] (f2fs_sync_file) from [<c0323fa0>] torvalds#14 [<c0323fa0>] (vfs_fsync_range) from [<c0324294>] torvalds#15 [<c0324294>] (do_fsync) from [<c0324014>] torvalds#16 [<c0324014>] (sys_fsync) from [<c0108bc0>] This can be caused by flush_dirty_inode() in f2fs_sync_node_pages() where iput() requires f2fs_lock_op() again resulting in livelock. Reported-by: Zhiguo Niu <Zhiguo.Niu@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 273108f ] Ext4 uses blkdev_get_by_dev() to get the block_device for journal device which does check to see if the read-only block device was opened read-only. As a result ext4 will hapily proceed mounting the file system with external journal on read-only device. This is bad as we would not be able to use the journal leading to errors later on. Instead of simply failing to mount file system in this case, treat it in a similar way we treat internal journal on read-only device. Allow to mount with -o noload in read-only mode. This can be reproduced easily like this: mke2fs -F -O journal_dev $JOURNAL_DEV 100M mkfs.$FSTYPE -F -J device=$JOURNAL_DEV $FS_DEV blockdev --setro $JOURNAL_DEV mount $FS_DEV $MNT touch $MNT/file umount $MNT leading to error like this [ 1307.318713] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1307.323362] generic_make_request: Trying to write to read-only block-device dm-2 (partno 0) [ 1307.331741] WARNING: CPU: 36 PID: 3224 at block/blk-core.c:855 generic_make_request_checks+0x2c3/0x580 [ 1307.341041] Modules linked in: ext4 mbcache jbd2 rfkill intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common isst_if_commd [ 1307.419445] CPU: 36 PID: 3224 Comm: jbd2/dm-2 Tainted: G W I 5.8.0-rc5 #2 [ 1307.427359] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R740/01KPX8, BIOS 2.3.10 08/15/2019 [ 1307.434932] RIP: 0010:generic_make_request_checks+0x2c3/0x580 [ 1307.440676] Code: 94 03 00 00 48 89 df 48 8d 74 24 08 c6 05 cf 2b 18 01 01 e8 7f a4 ff ff 48 c7 c7 50e [ 1307.459420] RSP: 0018:ffffc0d70eb5fb48 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 1307.464646] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9b33b2978300 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 1307.471780] RDX: ffff9b33e12a81e0 RSI: ffff9b33e1298000 RDI: ffff9b33e1298000 [ 1307.478913] RBP: ffff9b7b9679e0c0 R08: 0000000000000837 R09: 0000000000000024 [ 1307.486044] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffc0d70eb5f9f0 R12: 0000000000000400 [ 1307.493177] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 1307.500308] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9b33e1280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 1307.508396] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 1307.514142] CR2: 000055eaf4109000 CR3: 0000003dee40a006 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [ 1307.521273] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 1307.528407] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 1307.535538] PKRU: 55555554 [ 1307.538250] Call Trace: [ 1307.540708] generic_make_request+0x30/0x340 [ 1307.544985] submit_bio+0x43/0x190 [ 1307.548393] ? bio_add_page+0x62/0x90 [ 1307.552068] submit_bh_wbc+0x16a/0x190 [ 1307.555833] jbd2_write_superblock+0xec/0x200 [jbd2] [ 1307.560803] jbd2_journal_update_sb_log_tail+0x65/0xc0 [jbd2] [ 1307.566557] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x2ae/0x1860 [jbd2] [ 1307.572566] ? check_preempt_curr+0x7a/0x90 [ 1307.576756] ? update_curr+0xe1/0x1d0 [ 1307.580421] ? account_entity_dequeue+0x7b/0xb0 [ 1307.584955] ? newidle_balance+0x231/0x3d0 [ 1307.589056] ? __switch_to_asm+0x42/0x70 [ 1307.592986] ? __switch_to_asm+0x36/0x70 [ 1307.596918] ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 [ 1307.600851] kjournald2+0xbd/0x270 [jbd2] [ 1307.604873] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [ 1307.608460] ? commit_timeout+0x10/0x10 [jbd2] [ 1307.612915] kthread+0x114/0x130 [ 1307.616152] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [ 1307.619816] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 1307.623400] ---[ end trace 27490236265b1630 ]--- Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200717090605.2612-1-lczerner@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 205d300 upstream. We have a number of "uart.port->desc.lock vs desc.lock->uart.port" lockdep reports coming from 8250 driver; this causes a bit of trouble to people, so let's fix it. The problem is reverse lock order in two different call paths: chain #1: serial8250_do_startup() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); disable_irq_nosync(port->irq); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) chain #2: __report_bad_irq() raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) for_each_action_of_desc() printk() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); Fix this by changing the order of locks in serial8250_do_startup(): do disable_irq_nosync() first, which grabs desc->lock, and grab uart->port after that, so that chain #1 and chain #2 have same lock order. Full lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.4.39 torvalds#55 Not tainted ====================================================== swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffffab65b6c0 (console_owner){-...}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d __irq_get_desc_lock+0x65/0x89 __disable_irq_nosync+0x3b/0x93 serial8250_do_startup+0x451/0x75c uart_startup+0x1b4/0x2ff uart_port_activate+0x73/0xa0 tty_port_open+0xae/0x10a uart_open+0x1b/0x26 tty_open+0x24d/0x3a0 chrdev_open+0xd5/0x1cc do_dentry_open+0x299/0x3c8 path_openat+0x434/0x1100 do_filp_open+0x9b/0x10a do_sys_open+0x15f/0x3d7 kernel_init_freeable+0x157/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d serial8250_console_write+0xa7/0x2a0 console_unlock+0x3b7/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 register_console+0x336/0x3a4 uart_add_one_port+0x51b/0x5be serial8250_register_8250_port+0x454/0x55e dw8250_probe+0x4dc/0x5b9 platform_drv_probe+0x67/0x8b really_probe+0x14a/0x422 driver_probe_device+0x66/0x130 device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b __driver_attach+0xca/0x139 bus_for_each_dev+0x97/0xc9 bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228 driver_register+0x64/0xed do_one_initcall+0x20c/0x4a6 do_initcall_level+0xb5/0xc5 do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x58 kernel_init_freeable+0x13f/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 (console_owner){-...}: __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d cpuidle_enter_state+0x12f/0x1fd cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x3d do_idle+0x1ce/0x2ce cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f start_kernel+0x406/0x46a secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &irq_desc_lock_class Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&port_lock_key); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by swapper/0/0: #0: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba #1: ffffffffab65b5c0 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning+0x20/0x181 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.39 torvalds#55 Hardware name: XXXXXX Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0xbf/0x133 ? print_circular_bug+0xd6/0xe9 check_noncircular+0x1b9/0x1c3 __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 ? console_trylock+0x18/0x4e vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f ? lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf </IRQ> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Fixes: 768aec0 ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reported-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@google.com> BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817022646.1484638-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit a48b73e upstream. With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty torvalds#922 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock: ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 but task is already holding lock: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by compsize/11122: #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 stack backtrace: CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty torvalds#922 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks, which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user(). This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed. Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then copy_to_user_nofault for the copying. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit e89c4a9 upstream. I got the following lockdep splat while testing: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 torvalds#932 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/229626 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff828513f0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 but task is already holding lock: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #7 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #6 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x49/0x480 commit_cowonly_roots+0xb5/0x2a0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x516/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #5 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4bb/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #4 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70 start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 perf_read+0x141/0x2c0 vfs_read+0xad/0x1b0 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x88/0x150 perf_event_init+0x1db/0x20b start_kernel+0x3ae/0x53c secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 -> #1 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x4f/0x150 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb1/0x900 _cpu_up.constprop.26+0x9f/0x130 cpu_up+0x7b/0xc0 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60 smp_init+0x26/0x71 kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x258 kernel_init+0xa/0x103 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex --> &fs_info->scrub_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by btrfs/229626: #0: ffff88bfe8bb86e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0xbd/0x630 #1: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 229626 Comm: btrfs Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 torvalds#932 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 ? start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xca/0x160 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happens because we're allocating the scrub workqueues under the scrub and device list mutex, which brings in a whole host of other dependencies. Because the work queue allocation is done with GFP_KERNEL, it can trigger reclaim, which can lead to a transaction commit, which in turns needs the device_list_mutex, it can lead to a deadlock. A different problem for which this fix is a solution. Fix this by moving the actual allocation outside of the scrub lock, and then only take the lock once we're ready to actually assign them to the fs_info. We'll now have to cleanup the workqueues in a few more places, so I've added a helper to do the refcount dance to safely free the workqueues. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit fccc000 upstream. Nikolay reported a lockdep splat in generic/476 that I could reproduce with btrfs/187. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Tainted: G W ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9e8ef38b6268 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3a/0x1a0 btrfs_alloc_device+0x43/0x210 add_missing_dev+0x20/0x90 read_one_chunk+0x301/0x430 btrfs_read_sys_array+0x17b/0x1b0 open_ctree+0xa62/0x1896 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x379 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 vfs_rmdir.part.0+0x149/0x160 do_rmdir+0x136/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa9d65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9e8e9da260e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x92/0xc8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x11e/0x500 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This is because we are holding the chunk_mutex when we call btrfs_alloc_device, which does a GFP_KERNEL allocation. We don't want to switch that to a GFP_NOFS lock because this is the only place where it matters. So instead use memalloc_nofs_save() around the allocation in order to avoid the lockdep splat. Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 73a3212 upstream. Allocating memory with regulator_list_mutex held makes lockdep unhappy when memory pressure makes the system do fs_reclaim on eg. eMMC using a regulator. Push the lock inside regulator_init_coupling() after the allocation. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.7.13+ torvalds#533 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/383 is trying to acquire lock: cca78ca4 (&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: __submit_merged_write_cond+0x104/0x154 but task is already holding lock: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28 __kmalloc+0x54/0x218 regulator_register+0x860/0x1584 dummy_regulator_probe+0x60/0xa8 [...] other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem --> regulator_list_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(regulator_list_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kswapd0/383: #0: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50 [...] Fixes: d8ca7d1 ("regulator: core: Introduce API for regulators coupling customization") Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1a889cf7f61c6429c9e6b34ddcdde99be77a26b6.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

…emory [ Upstream commit 103a854 ] If the hypervisor doesn't support hugepages, the kernel ends up allocating a large number of page table pages. The early page table allocation was wrongly setting the max memblock limit to ppc64_rma_size with radix translation which resulted in boot failure as shown below. Kernel panic - not syncing: early_alloc_pgtable: Failed to allocate 16777216 bytes align=0x1000000 nid=-1 from=0x0000000000000000 max_addr=0xffffffffffffffff CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.8.0-24.9-default+ #2 Call Trace: [c0000000016f3d00] [c0000000007c6470] dump_stack+0xc4/0x114 (unreliable) [c0000000016f3d40] [c00000000014c78c] panic+0x164/0x418 [c0000000016f3dd0] [c000000000098890] early_alloc_pgtable+0xe0/0xec [c0000000016f3e60] [c0000000010a5440] radix__early_init_mmu+0x360/0x4b4 [c0000000016f3ef0] [c000000001099bac] early_init_mmu+0x1c/0x3c [c0000000016f3f10] [c00000000109a320] early_setup+0x134/0x170 This was because the kernel was checking for the radix feature before we enable the feature via mmu_features. This resulted in the kernel using hash restrictions on radix. Rework the early init code such that the kernel boot with memblock restrictions as imposed by hash. At that point, the kernel still hasn't finalized the translation the kernel will end up using. We have three different ways of detecting radix. 1. dt_cpu_ftrs_scan -> used only in case of PowerNV 2. ibm,pa-features -> Used when we don't use cpu_dt_ftr_scan 3. CAS -> Where we negotiate with hypervisor about the supported translation. We look at 1 or 2 early in the boot and after that, we look at the CAS vector to finalize the translation the kernel will use. We also support a kernel command line option (disable_radix) to switch to hash. Update the memblock limit after mmu_early_init_devtree() if the kernel is going to use radix translation. This forces some of the memblock allocations we do before mmu_early_init_devtree() to be within the RMA limit. Fixes: 2bfd65e ("powerpc/mm/radix: Add radix callbacks for early init routines") Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta <shiganta@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200828100852.426575-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 8a39e8c ] When compiling with DEBUG=1 on Fedora 32 I'm getting crash for 'perf test signal': Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () #1 0x00000000004d62e9 in test_function () at tests/bp_signal.c:61 #2 0x00000000004d689a in test__bp_signal (test=0xa8e280 <generic_ ... #3 0x00000000004b7d49 in run_test (test=0xa8e280 <generic_tests+1 ... #4 0x00000000004b7e7f in test_and_print (t=0xa8e280 <generic_test ... #5 0x00000000004b8927 in __cmd_test (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdce0, ... ... It's caused by the symbol __test_function being in the ".bss" section: $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [28] .bss NOBITS 0000000000c356a0 008346a0 00000000000511f8 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 32 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 0000000000c68548 B __test_function I guess most of the time we're just lucky the inline asm ended up in the ".text" section, so making it specific explicit with push and pop section clauses. $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [13] .text PROGBITS 0000000000431240 00031240 0000000000306faa 0000000000000000 AX 0 0 16 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 00000000004d62c8 T __test_function Committer testing: $ readelf -wi ~/bin/perf | grep producer -m1 <c> DW_AT_producer : (indirect string, offset: 0x254a): GNU C99 10.2.1 20200723 (Red Hat 10.2.1-1) -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -ggdb3 -std=gnu99 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -fstack-protector-all ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ $ Before: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : FAILED! $ After: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : Ok $ Fixes: 8fd34e1 ("perf test: Improve bp_signal") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200911130005.1842138-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 22fe5a2 ] The aliases were never released causing the following leaks: Indirect leak of 1224 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7feefb830628 in malloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x107628) #1 0x56332c8f1b62 in __perf_pmu__new_alias util/pmu.c:322 #2 0x56332c8f401f in pmu_add_cpu_aliases_map util/pmu.c:778 #3 0x56332c792ce9 in __test__pmu_event_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:295 #4 0x56332c792ce9 in test_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:367 #5 0x56332c76a09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #6 0x56332c76a09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #7 0x56332c76ce69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695 #8 0x56332c76ce69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #9 0x56332c7d2214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 torvalds#10 0x56332c6701a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 torvalds#11 0x56332c6701a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 torvalds#12 0x56332c6701a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 torvalds#13 0x7feefb359cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: 956a783 ("perf test: Test pmu-events aliases") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-11-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit b12eea5 ] The evsel->unit borrows a pointer of pmu event or alias instead of owns a string. But tool event (duration_time) passes a result of strdup() caused a leak. It was found by ASAN during metric test: Direct leak of 210 byte(s) in 70 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fe366fca0b5 in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x920b5) #1 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in add_event_tool util/parse-events.c:414 #2 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in parse_events_add_tool util/parse-events.c:1414 #3 0x559fbbd8474d in parse_events_parse util/parse-events.y:439 #4 0x559fbbcc95da in parse_events__scanner util/parse-events.c:2096 #5 0x559fbbcc95da in __parse_events util/parse-events.c:2141 #6 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:406 #7 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:393 #8 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_cpu tests/pmu-events.c:415 #9 0x559fbbc28555 in test_parsing tests/pmu-events.c:498 torvalds#10 0x559fbbc0109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 torvalds#11 0x559fbbc0109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 torvalds#12 0x559fbbc03e69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695 torvalds#13 0x559fbbc03e69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 torvalds#14 0x559fbbc691f4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 torvalds#15 0x559fbbb071a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 torvalds#16 0x559fbbb071a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 torvalds#17 0x559fbbb071a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 torvalds#18 0x7fe366b68cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: f0fbb11 ("perf stat: Implement duration_time as a proper event") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-6-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit d26383d ] The following leaks were detected by ASAN: Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) #1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333 #2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59 #3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73 #4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155 #5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 #6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 #7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 #8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 #9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 torvalds#10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 torvalds#11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 torvalds#12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 torvalds#13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-12-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 843d926 ] syzbot reported twice a lockdep issue in fib6_del() [1] which I think is caused by net->ipv6.fib6_null_entry having a NULL fib6_table pointer. fib6_del() already checks for fib6_null_entry special case, we only need to return earlier. Bug seems to occur very rarely, I have thus chosen a 'bug origin' that makes backports not too complex. [1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.9.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1996 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 4 locks held by syz-executor.5/8095: #0: ffffffff8a7ea708 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ppp_release+0x178/0x240 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:401 #1: ffff88804c422dd8 (&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_trylock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:414 [inline] #1: ffff88804c422dd8 (&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: fib6_run_gc+0x21b/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2312 #2: ffffffff89bd6a40 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __fib6_clean_all+0x0/0x290 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2613 #3: ffff8880a82e6430 (&tb->tb6_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:359 [inline] #3: ffff8880a82e6430 (&tb->tb6_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __fib6_clean_all+0x107/0x290 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2245 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 8095 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118 fib6_del+0x12b4/0x1630 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1996 fib6_clean_node+0x39b/0x570 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2180 fib6_walk_continue+0x4aa/0x8e0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2102 fib6_walk+0x182/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2150 fib6_clean_tree+0xdb/0x120 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2230 __fib6_clean_all+0x120/0x290 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2246 fib6_clean_all net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2257 [inline] fib6_run_gc+0x113/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2320 ndisc_netdev_event+0x217/0x350 net/ipv6/ndisc.c:1805 notifier_call_chain+0xb5/0x200 kernel/notifier.c:83 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xb5/0x130 net/core/dev.c:2033 call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2045 [inline] call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2059 [inline] dev_close_many+0x30b/0x650 net/core/dev.c:1634 rollback_registered_many+0x3a8/0x1210 net/core/dev.c:9261 rollback_registered net/core/dev.c:9329 [inline] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x2dd/0x570 net/core/dev.c:10410 unregister_netdevice include/linux/netdevice.h:2774 [inline] ppp_release+0x216/0x240 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:403 __fput+0x285/0x920 fs/file_table.c:281 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fixes: 421842e ("net/ipv6: Add fib6_null_entry") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

…arnings [ Upstream commit 2f1e8ea ] Since commit 845e0eb ("net: change addr_list_lock back to static key"), cascaded DSA setups (DSA switch port as DSA master for another DSA switch port) are emitting this lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.8.0-rc1-00133-g923e4b5032dd-dirty torvalds#208 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- dhcpcd/323 is trying to acquire lock: ffff000066dd4268 (&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90 but task is already holding lock: ffff00006608c268 (&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1); lock(&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by dhcpcd/323: #0: ffffdbd1381dda18 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x24/0x30 #1: ffff00006614b268 (_xmit_ETHER){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_set_rx_mode+0x28/0x48 #2: ffff00006608c268 (&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90 stack backtrace: Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e0 show_stack+0x20/0x30 dump_stack+0xec/0x158 __lock_acquire+0xca0/0x2398 lock_acquire+0xe8/0x440 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x64/0x90 dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90 dsa_slave_set_rx_mode+0x34/0x50 __dev_set_rx_mode+0x60/0xa0 dev_mc_sync+0x84/0x90 dsa_slave_set_rx_mode+0x34/0x50 __dev_set_rx_mode+0x60/0xa0 dev_set_rx_mode+0x30/0x48 __dev_open+0x10c/0x180 __dev_change_flags+0x170/0x1c8 dev_change_flags+0x2c/0x70 devinet_ioctl+0x774/0x878 inet_ioctl+0x348/0x3b0 sock_do_ioctl+0x50/0x310 sock_ioctl+0x1f8/0x580 ksys_ioctl+0xb0/0xf0 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x180 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x98 el0_sync_handler+0x9c/0x1b8 el0_sync+0x158/0x180 Since DSA never made use of the netdev API for describing links between upper devices and lower devices, the dev->lower_level value of a DSA switch interface would be 1, which would warn when it is a DSA master. We can use netdev_upper_dev_link() to describe the relationship between a DSA slave and a DSA master. To be precise, a DSA "slave" (switch port) is an "upper" to a DSA "master" (host port). The relationship is "many uppers to one lower", like in the case of VLAN. So, for that reason, we use the same function as VLAN uses. There might be a chance that somebody will try to take hold of this interface and use it immediately after register_netdev() and before netdev_upper_dev_link(). To avoid that, we do the registration and linkage while holding the RTNL, and we use the RTNL-locked cousin of register_netdev(), which is register_netdevice(). Since this warning was not there when lockdep was using dynamic keys for addr_list_lock, we are blaming the lockdep patch itself. The network stack _has_ been using static lockdep keys before, and it _is_ likely that stacked DSA setups have been triggering these lockdep warnings since forever, however I can't test very old kernels on this particular stacked DSA setup, to ensure I'm not in fact introducing regressions. Fixes: 845e0eb ("net: change addr_list_lock back to static key") Suggested-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit fad8e0d ] syzbot reports a potential lock deadlock between the normal IO path and ->show_fdinfo(): ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.2/19710 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888098ddc450 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: io_write+0x6b5/0xb30 fs/io_uring.c:3296 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880a11b8428 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xe9a/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8348 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 __io_uring_show_fdinfo fs/io_uring.c:8417 [inline] io_uring_show_fdinfo+0x194/0xc70 fs/io_uring.c:8460 seq_show+0x4a8/0x700 fs/proc/fd.c:65 seq_read+0x432/0x1070 fs/seq_file.c:208 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:734 [inline] do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:721 [inline] do_iter_read+0x48e/0x6e0 fs/read_write.c:955 vfs_readv+0xe5/0x150 fs/read_write.c:1073 kernel_readv fs/splice.c:355 [inline] default_file_splice_read.constprop.0+0x4e6/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:412 do_splice_to+0x137/0x170 fs/splice.c:871 splice_direct_to_actor+0x307/0x980 fs/splice.c:950 do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:1059 do_sendfile+0x55f/0xd40 fs/read_write.c:1540 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1601 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1587 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1587 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 seq_read+0x61/0x1070 fs/seq_file.c:155 pde_read fs/proc/inode.c:306 [inline] proc_reg_read+0x221/0x300 fs/proc/inode.c:318 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:734 [inline] do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:721 [inline] do_iter_read+0x48e/0x6e0 fs/read_write.c:955 vfs_readv+0xe5/0x150 fs/read_write.c:1073 kernel_readv fs/splice.c:355 [inline] default_file_splice_read.constprop.0+0x4e6/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:412 do_splice_to+0x137/0x170 fs/splice.c:871 splice_direct_to_actor+0x307/0x980 fs/splice.c:950 do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:1059 do_sendfile+0x55f/0xd40 fs/read_write.c:1540 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1601 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1587 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1587 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4441 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xaf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5029 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write+0x228/0x450 fs/super.c:1672 io_write+0x6b5/0xb30 fs/io_uring.c:3296 io_issue_sqe+0x18f/0x5c50 fs/io_uring.c:5719 __io_queue_sqe+0x280/0x1160 fs/io_uring.c:6175 io_queue_sqe+0x692/0xfa0 fs/io_uring.c:6254 io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6324 [inline] io_submit_sqes+0x1761/0x2400 fs/io_uring.c:6521 __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xeac/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8349 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: sb_writers#4 --> &p->lock --> &ctx->uring_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ctx->uring_lock); lock(&p->lock); lock(&ctx->uring_lock); lock(sb_writers#4); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.2/19710: #0: ffff8880a11b8428 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xe9a/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8348 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 19710 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118 check_noncircular+0x324/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1827 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4441 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xaf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5029 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write+0x228/0x450 fs/super.c:1672 io_write+0x6b5/0xb30 fs/io_uring.c:3296 io_issue_sqe+0x18f/0x5c50 fs/io_uring.c:5719 __io_queue_sqe+0x280/0x1160 fs/io_uring.c:6175 io_queue_sqe+0x692/0xfa0 fs/io_uring.c:6254 io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6324 [inline] io_submit_sqes+0x1761/0x2400 fs/io_uring.c:6521 __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xeac/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8349 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x45e179 Code: 3d b2 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 0b b2 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007f1194e74c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001aa RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000082c0 RCX: 000000000045e179 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 000000000118cf98 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000118cf4c R13: 00007ffd1aa5756f R14: 00007f1194e759c0 R15: 000000000118cf4c Fix this by just not diving into details if we fail to trylock the io_uring mutex. We know the ctx isn't going away during this operation, but we cannot safely iterate buffers/files/personalities if we don't hold the io_uring mutex. Reported-by: syzbot+2f8fa4e860edc3066aba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit a466c85 ] When closing and freeing the source device we could end up doing our final blkdev_put() on the bdev, which will grab the bd_mutex. As such we want to be holding as few locks as possible, so move this call outside of the dev_replace->lock_finishing_cancel_unmount lock. Since we're modifying the fs_devices we need to make sure we're holding the uuid_mutex here, so take that as well. There's a report from syzbot probably hitting one of the cases where the bd_mutex and device_list_mutex are taken in the wrong order, however it's not with device replace, like this patch fixes. As there's no reproducer available so far, we can't verify the fix. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000fc04d105afcf86d7@google.com/ dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=84a0634dc5d21d488419 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.0/6878 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88804c17d780 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x281/0xf90 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5255 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2f3/0x700 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2109 __btrfs_end_transaction+0xf5/0x690 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:916 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3807 [inline] find_free_extent+0x23b7/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline] wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294 -> #3 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write+0x234/0x470 fs/super.c:1672 sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1690 [inline] start_transaction+0xbe7/0x1170 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:624 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3789 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25e1/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline] wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294 -> #2 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x60e/0xac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3041 wb_shutdown+0x180/0x220 mm/backing-dev.c:355 bdi_unregister+0x174/0x590 mm/backing-dev.c:872 del_gendisk+0x820/0xa10 block/genhd.c:933 loop_remove drivers/block/loop.c:2192 [inline] loop_control_ioctl drivers/block/loop.c:2291 [inline] loop_control_ioctl+0x3b1/0x480 drivers/block/loop.c:2257 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (loop_ctl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 lo_open+0x19/0xd0 drivers/block/loop.c:1893 __blkdev_get+0x759/0x1aa0 fs/block_dev.c:1507 blkdev_get fs/block_dev.c:1639 [inline] blkdev_open+0x227/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1753 do_dentry_open+0x4b9/0x11b0 fs/open.c:817 do_open fs/namei.c:3251 [inline] path_openat+0x1b9a/0x2730 fs/namei.c:3368 do_filp_open+0x17e/0x3c0 fs/namei.c:3395 do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x420 fs/open.c:1168 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1184 [inline] __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1192 [inline] __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1188 [inline] __x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1188 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline] btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline] btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline] close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161 close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline] btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179 close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149 generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464 kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108 btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265 deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335 deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366 cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &bdev->bd_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by syz-executor.0/6878: #0: ffff88809070c0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#70){++++}-{3:3}, at: deactivate_super+0xa5/0xd0 fs/super.c:365 #1: ffffffff8a5b37a8 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_close_devices+0x23/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1178 #2: ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 6878 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118 check_noncircular+0x324/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1827 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline] btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline] btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline] close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161 close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline] btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179 close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149 generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464 kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108 btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265 deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335 deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366 cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x460027 RSP: 002b:00007fff59216328 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000076035 RCX: 0000000000460027 RDX: 0000000000403188 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00007fff592163d0 RBP: 0000000000000333 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000b R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff59217460 R13: 0000000002df2a60 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fff59217460 Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> [ add syzbot reference ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 27dada0 ] The defer ops code has been finishing items in the wrong order -- if a top level defer op creates items A and B, and finishing item A creates more defer ops A1 and A2, we'll put the new items on the end of the chain and process them in the order A B A1 A2. This is kind of weird, since it's convenient for programmers to be able to think of A and B as an ordered sequence where all the sub-tasks for A must finish before we move on to B, e.g. A A1 A2 D. Right now, our log intent items are not so complex that this matters, but this will become important for the atomic extent swapping patchset. In order to maintain correct reference counting of extents, we have to unmap and remap extents in that order, and we want to complete that work before moving on to the next range that the user wants to swap. This patch fixes defer ops to satsify that requirement. The primary symptom of the incorrect order was noticed in an early performance analysis of the atomic extent swap code. An astonishingly large number of deferred work items accumulated when userspace requested an atomic update of two very fragmented files. The cause of this was traced to the same ordering bug in the inner loop of xfs_defer_finish_noroll. If the ->finish_item method of a deferred operation queues new deferred operations, those new deferred ops are appended to the tail of the pending work list. To illustrate, say that a caller creates a transaction t0 with four deferred operations D0-D3. The first thing defer ops does is roll the transaction to t1, leaving us with: t1: D0(t0), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0) Let's say that finishing each of D0-D3 will create two new deferred ops. After finish D0 and roll, we'll have the following chain: t2: D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0), d4(t1), d5(t1) d4 and d5 were logged to t1. Notice that while we're about to start work on D1, we haven't actually completed all the work implied by D0 being finished. So far we've been careful (or lucky) to structure the dfops callers such that D1 doesn't depend on d4 or d5 being finished, but this is a potential logic bomb. There's a second problem lurking. Let's see what happens as we finish D1-D3: t3: D2(t0), D3(t0), d4(t1), d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2) t4: D3(t0), d4(t1), d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3) t5: d4(t1), d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3), d10(t4), d11(t4) Let's say that d4-d11 are simple work items that don't queue any other operations, which means that we can complete each d4 and roll to t6: t6: d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3), d10(t4), d11(t4) t7: d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3), d10(t4), d11(t4) ... t11: d10(t4), d11(t4) t12: d11(t4) <done> When we try to roll to transaction torvalds#12, we're holding defer op d11, which we logged way back in t4. This means that the tail of the log is pinned at t4. If the log is very small or there are a lot of other threads updating metadata, this means that we might have wrapped the log and cannot get roll to t11 because there isn't enough space left before we'd run into t4. Let's shift back to the original failure. I mentioned before that I discovered this flaw while developing the atomic file update code. In that scenario, we have a defer op (D0) that finds a range of file blocks to remap, creates a handful of new defer ops to do that, and then asks to be continued with however much work remains. So, D0 is the original swapext deferred op. The first thing defer ops does is rolls to t1: t1: D0(t0) We try to finish D0, logging d1 and d2 in the process, but can't get all the work done. We log a done item and a new intent item for the work that D0 still has to do, and roll to t2: t2: D0'(t1), d1(t1), d2(t1) We roll and try to finish D0', but still can't get all the work done, so we log a done item and a new intent item for it, requeue D0 a second time, and roll to t3: t3: D0''(t2), d1(t1), d2(t1), d3(t2), d4(t2) If it takes 48 more rolls to complete D0, then we'll finally dispense with D0 in t50: t50: D<fifty primes>(t49), d1(t1), ..., d102(t50) We then try to roll again to get a chain like this: t51: d1(t1), d2(t1), ..., d101(t50), d102(t50) ... t152: d102(t50) <done> Notice that in rolling to transaction torvalds#51, we're holding on to a log intent item for d1 that was logged in transaction #1. This means that the tail of the log is pinned at t1. If the log is very small or there are a lot of other threads updating metadata, this means that we might have wrapped the log and cannot roll to t51 because there isn't enough space left before we'd run into t1. This is of course problem #2 again. But notice the third problem with this scenario: we have 102 defer ops tied to this transaction! Each of these items are backed by pinned kernel memory, which means that we risk OOM if the chains get too long. Yikes. Problem #1 is a subtle logic bomb that could hit someone in the future; problem #2 applies (rarely) to the current upstream, and problem #3 applies to work under development. This is not how incremental deferred operations were supposed to work. The dfops design of logging in the same transaction an intent-done item and a new intent item for the work remaining was to make it so that we only have to juggle enough deferred work items to finish that one small piece of work. Deferred log item recovery will find that first unfinished work item and restart it, no matter how many other intent items might follow it in the log. Therefore, it's ok to put the new intents at the start of the dfops chain. For the first example, the chains look like this: t2: d4(t1), d5(t1), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0) t3: d5(t1), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0) ... t9: d9(t7), D3(t0) t10: D3(t0) t11: d10(t10), d11(t10) t12: d11(t10) For the second example, the chains look like this: t1: D0(t0) t2: d1(t1), d2(t1), D0'(t1) t3: d2(t1), D0'(t1) t4: D0'(t1) t5: d1(t4), d2(t4), D0''(t4) ... t148: D0<50 primes>(t147) t149: d101(t148), d102(t148) t150: d102(t148) <done> This actually sucks more for pinning the log tail (we try to roll to t10 while holding an intent item that was logged in t1) but we've solved problem #1. We've also reduced the maximum chain length from: sum(all the new items) + nr_original_items to: max(new items that each original item creates) + nr_original_items This solves problem #3 by sharply reducing the number of defer ops that can be attached to a transaction at any given time. The change makes the problem of log tail pinning worse, but is improvement we need to solve problem #2. Actually solving #2, however, is left to the next patch. Note that a subsequent analysis of some hard-to-trigger reflink and COW livelocks on extremely fragmented filesystems (or systems running a lot of IO threads) showed the same symptoms -- uncomfortably large numbers of incore deferred work items and occasional stalls in the transaction grant code while waiting for log reservations. I think this patch and the next one will also solve these problems. As originally written, the code used list_splice_tail_init instead of list_splice_init, so change that, and leave a short comment explaining our actions. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit ce3653a ] The trace below can appear: [83613.832200] INFO: trying to register non-static key. [83613.837248] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. [83613.842808] turning off the locking correctness validator. [83613.848375] CPU: 3 PID: 141 Comm: kworker/3:2H Tainted: G O 5.6.13-silabs15 #2 [83613.857019] Hardware name: BCM2835 [83613.860605] Workqueue: events_highpri bh_work [wfx] [83613.865552] Backtrace: [83613.868041] [<c010f2cc>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c010f7b8>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) [83613.881463] [<c010f798>] (show_stack) from [<c0d82138>] (dump_stack+0xe8/0x114) [83613.888882] [<c0d82050>] (dump_stack) from [<c01a02ec>] (register_lock_class+0x748/0x768) [83613.905035] [<c019fba4>] (register_lock_class) from [<c019da04>] (__lock_acquire+0x88/0x13dc) [83613.924192] [<c019d97c>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c019f6a4>] (lock_acquire+0xe8/0x274) [83613.942644] [<c019f5bc>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0daa5dc>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x6c) [83613.961714] [<c0daa584>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c0ab3248>] (skb_dequeue+0x24/0x78) [83613.974967] [<c0ab3224>] (skb_dequeue) from [<bf330db0>] (wfx_tx_queues_get+0x96c/0x1294 [wfx]) [83613.989728] [<bf330444>] (wfx_tx_queues_get [wfx]) from [<bf320454>] (bh_work+0x454/0x26d8 [wfx]) [83614.009337] [<bf320000>] (bh_work [wfx]) from [<c014c920>] (process_one_work+0x23c/0x7ec) [83614.028141] [<c014c6e4>] (process_one_work) from [<c014cf1c>] (worker_thread+0x4c/0x55c) [83614.046861] [<c014ced0>] (worker_thread) from [<c0154c04>] (kthread+0x138/0x168) [83614.064876] [<c0154acc>] (kthread) from [<c01010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) [83614.072200] Exception stack(0xecad3fb0 to 0xecad3ff8) [83614.077323] 3fa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [83614.085620] 3fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [83614.093914] 3fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 Indeed, the code of wfx_add_interface() shows that the interface is enabled to early. So, the spinlock associated with some skb_queue may not yet initialized when wfx_tx_queues_get() is called. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200825085828.399505-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…adlock [ Upstream commit df64880 ] After base_lock which occupy by ath11k_regd_update, the softirq run for WMI_REG_CHAN_LIST_CC_EVENTID maybe arrived and it also need to accuire the spin lock, then deadlock happend, change to disable softirqis to solve it. [ 235.576990] ================================ [ 235.576991] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 235.576993] 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ torvalds#196 Not tainted [ 235.576994] -------------------------------- [ 235.576995] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. [ 235.576997] kworker/u16:1/98 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: [ 235.576998] ffff9655f75cad98 (&ab->base_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k] [ 235.577009] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: [ 235.577013] __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0 [ 235.577015] lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270 [ 235.577018] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70 [ 235.577023] ath11k_reg_chan_list_event.isra.0+0x10d/0x1e0 [ath11k] [ 235.577028] ath11k_wmi_tlv_op_rx+0x3c3/0x560 [ath11k] [ 235.577033] ath11k_htc_rx_completion_handler+0x207/0x370 [ath11k] [ 235.577039] ath11k_ce_recv_process_cb+0x15e/0x1e0 [ath11k] [ 235.577041] ath11k_pci_ce_tasklet+0x10/0x30 [ath11k_pci] [ 235.577043] tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xd4/0xf0 [ 235.577045] __do_softirq+0xc9/0x482 [ 235.577046] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20 [ 235.577048] do_softirq_own_stack+0x49/0x60 [ 235.577049] irq_exit_rcu+0x9a/0xd0 [ 235.577050] common_interrupt+0xa1/0x190 [ 235.577052] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 [ 235.577053] cpu_idle_poll.isra.0+0x2e/0x60 [ 235.577055] do_idle+0x5f/0xe0 [ 235.577056] cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 [ 235.577058] start_kernel+0x443/0x464 [ 235.577060] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 235.577061] irq event stamp: 432035 [ 235.577063] hardirqs last enabled at (432035): [<ffffffff968d12b4>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x40 [ 235.577064] hardirqs last disabled at (432034): [<ffffffff968d10d3>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x63/0x80 [ 235.577066] softirqs last enabled at (431998): [<ffffffff967115c1>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3f1/0x430 [ 235.577067] softirqs last disabled at (431996): [<ffffffff9671159f>] inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs+0x3cf/0x430 [ 235.577068] [ 235.577068] other info that might help us debug this: [ 235.577069] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 235.577069] [ 235.577070] CPU0 [ 235.577070] ---- [ 235.577071] lock(&ab->base_lock); [ 235.577072] <Interrupt> [ 235.577073] lock(&ab->base_lock); [ 235.577074] [ 235.577074] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 235.577074] [ 235.577075] 3 locks held by kworker/u16:1/98: [ 235.577076] #0: ffff9655f75b1d48 ((wq_completion)ath11k_qmi_driver_event){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0 [ 235.577079] #1: ffffa33cc02f3e70 ((work_completion)(&ab->qmi.event_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d3/0x5d0 [ 235.577081] #2: ffff9655f75cad50 (&ab->core_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x4e/0x160 [ath11k] [ 235.577087] [ 235.577087] stack backtrace: [ 235.577088] CPU: 3 PID: 98 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-wt-ath+ torvalds#196 [ 235.577089] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7HVK/NUC8i7HVB, BIOS HNKBLi70.86A.0049.2018.0801.1601 08/01/2018 [ 235.577095] Workqueue: ath11k_qmi_driver_event ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work [ath11k] [ 235.577096] Call Trace: [ 235.577100] dump_stack+0x77/0xa0 [ 235.577102] mark_lock_irq.cold+0x15/0x3c [ 235.577104] mark_lock+0x1d7/0x540 [ 235.577105] mark_usage+0xc7/0x140 [ 235.577107] __lock_acquire+0x219/0x6e0 [ 235.577108] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xb0 [ 235.577110] lock_acquire+0xb6/0x270 [ 235.577116] ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k] [ 235.577118] ? atomic_notifier_chain_register+0x2d/0x40 [ 235.577120] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x70 [ 235.577125] ? ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k] [ 235.577130] ath11k_regd_update+0x28/0x1d0 [ath11k] [ 235.577136] __ath11k_mac_register+0x3fb/0x480 [ath11k] [ 235.577141] ath11k_mac_register+0x119/0x180 [ath11k] [ 235.577146] ath11k_core_pdev_create+0x17/0xe0 [ath11k] [ 235.577150] ath11k_core_qmi_firmware_ready.part.0+0x65/0x160 [ath11k] [ 235.577155] ath11k_qmi_driver_event_work+0x1c5/0x230 [ath11k] [ 235.577158] process_one_work+0x265/0x5d0 [ 235.577160] worker_thread+0x49/0x300 [ 235.577161] ? process_one_work+0x5d0/0x5d0 [ 235.577163] kthread+0x135/0x150 [ 235.577164] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x60/0x60 [ 235.577166] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Tested-on: QCA6390 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1 Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1601399736-3210-7-git-send-email-kvalo@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit ca10845 upstream. While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f3cd2c5: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 66d204a upstream. Very sporadically I had test case btrfs/069 from fstests hanging (for years, it is not a recent regression), with the following traces in dmesg/syslog: [162301.160628] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started [162301.181196] BTRFS info (device sdc): scrub: finished on devid 4 with status: 0 [162301.287162] BTRFS info (device sdc): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 2) to /dev/sdg finished [162513.513792] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1356167 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.514318] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.514522] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.514747] task:btrfs-transacti state:D stack: 0 pid:1356167 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 [162513.514751] Call Trace: [162513.514761] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.514765] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.514771] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.514844] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.514850] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.514864] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.514879] transaction_kthread+0xa4/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.514891] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x660/0x660 [btrfs] [162513.514894] kthread+0x153/0x170 [162513.514897] ? kthread_stop+0x2c0/0x2c0 [162513.514902] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [162513.514916] INFO: task fsstress:1356184 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.515192] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.515431] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.515680] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356184 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.515682] Call Trace: [162513.515688] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.515691] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.515697] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.515712] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.515716] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.515729] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.515743] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.515753] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.515758] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.515761] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.515765] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.515768] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.515771] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.515774] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.515781] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.515782] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.515784] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.515786] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.515788] RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 000000000daf0e74 RDI: 000000000000003a [162513.515789] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.515791] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000000000000003a [162513.515792] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.515804] INFO: task fsstress:1356185 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.516064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.516329] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.516617] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356185 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.516620] Call Trace: [162513.516625] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.516628] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.516634] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.516647] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.516650] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.516662] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.516679] btrfs_setxattr_trans+0x3c/0x100 [btrfs] [162513.516686] __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 [162513.516691] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x70/0x200 [162513.516697] vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x120 [162513.516703] setxattr+0x125/0x240 [162513.516709] ? lock_acquire+0xb1/0x480 [162513.516712] ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.516721] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x8e/0xb0 [162513.516723] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516725] ? __sb_start_write+0x19b/0x290 [162513.516727] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0 [162513.516732] path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 [162513.516739] __x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30 [162513.516741] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.516743] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.516745] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f56d5a [162513.516746] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.516748] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97868 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000bc [162513.516750] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f5238f56d5a [162513.516751] RDX: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 RSI: 00007fff67b978a0 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.516753] RBP: 000055b1fbb0d5a0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fff67b97700 [162513.516754] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 [162513.516756] R13: 0000000000000024 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fff67b978a0 [162513.516767] INFO: task fsstress:1356196 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.517064] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.517365] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.517763] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356196 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00004000 [162513.517780] Call Trace: [162513.517786] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.517789] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.517796] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.517810] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.517814] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.517829] start_transaction+0x37c/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.517845] btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1f/0x50 [btrfs] [162513.517857] btrfs_sync_fs+0x61/0x1c0 [btrfs] [162513.517862] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 [162513.517865] iterate_supers+0x87/0xf0 [162513.517869] ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 [162513.517872] __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 [162513.517875] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.517878] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.517881] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f50bd7 [162513.517883] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.517885] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b978e8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 [162513.517887] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b1fad2c560 RCX: 00007f5238f50bd7 [162513.517889] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000007660add2 RDI: 0000000000000053 [162513.517891] RBP: 0000000000000032 R08: 0000000000000067 R09: 00007f5239019be0 [162513.517893] R10: fffffffffffff24f R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000053 [162513.517895] R13: 00007fff67b97950 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1a340 [162513.517908] INFO: task fsstress:1356197 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.518298] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.518672] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.519157] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:1356197 ppid:1356177 flags:0x00000000 [162513.519160] Call Trace: [162513.519165] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.519168] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.519174] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.519190] wait_current_trans+0xde/0x140 [btrfs] [162513.519193] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.519206] start_transaction+0x4d7/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.519222] btrfs_create+0x57/0x200 [btrfs] [162513.519230] lookup_open+0x522/0x650 [162513.519246] path_openat+0x2b8/0xa50 [162513.519270] do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 [162513.519275] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.519280] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.519285] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 [162513.519287] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [162513.519295] do_sys_openat2+0x20d/0x2d0 [162513.519300] do_sys_open+0x44/0x80 [162513.519304] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.519307] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.519309] RIP: 0033:0x7f5238f4a903 [162513.519310] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.519312] RSP: 002b:00007fff67b97758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055 [162513.519314] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007f5238f4a903 [162513.519316] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001b6 RDI: 000055b1fbb0d470 [162513.519317] RBP: 00007fff67b978c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000002 [162513.519319] R10: 00007fff67b974f7 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000013 [162513.519320] R13: 00000000000001b6 R14: 00007fff67b97906 R15: 000055b1fad1c620 [162513.519332] INFO: task btrfs:1356211 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [162513.519727] Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-btrfs-next-69 #1 [162513.520115] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [162513.520508] task:btrfs state:D stack: 0 pid:1356211 ppid:1356178 flags:0x00004002 [162513.520511] Call Trace: [162513.520516] __schedule+0x5ce/0xd00 [162513.520519] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x60 [162513.520525] schedule+0x46/0xf0 [162513.520544] btrfs_scrub_pause+0x11f/0x180 [btrfs] [162513.520548] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 [162513.520562] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x45a/0xc30 [btrfs] [162513.520574] ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520596] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x6d8/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520619] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold+0x1cc/0x1fd [btrfs] [162513.520639] btrfs_ioctl+0x2a25/0x36f0 [btrfs] [162513.520643] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520645] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 [162513.520648] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520651] ? lock_acquired+0x33b/0x470 [162513.520655] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 [162513.520657] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7d/0x100 [162513.520660] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x35/0x50 [162513.520662] ? do_sigaction+0xf3/0x240 [162513.520671] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520672] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [162513.520677] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [162513.520679] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [162513.520681] RIP: 0033:0x7fc3cd307d87 [162513.520682] Code: Bad RIP value. [162513.520684] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30a56bb8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [162513.520686] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fc3cd307d87 [162513.520687] RDX: 00007ffe30a57a30 RSI: 00000000ca289435 RDI: 0000000000000003 [162513.520689] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [162513.520690] R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [162513.520692] R13: 0000557323a212e0 R14: 00007ffe30a5a520 R15: 0000000000000001 [162513.520703] Showing all locks held in the system: [162513.520712] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/54: [162513.520713] #0: ffffffffb40a91a0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x15/0x197 [162513.520728] 1 lock held by in:imklog/596: [162513.520729] #0: ffff8f3f0d781400 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x4d/0x60 [162513.520782] 1 lock held by btrfs-transacti/1356167: [162513.520784] #0: ffff8f3d810cc848 (&fs_info->transaction_kthread_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: transaction_kthread+0x4a/0x170 [btrfs] [162513.520798] 1 lock held by btrfs/1356190: [162513.520800] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0x60 [162513.520805] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356184: [162513.520806] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520811] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356185: [162513.520812] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520815] #1: ffff8f3d80a650b8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x50/0x120 [162513.520820] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520833] 1 lock held by fsstress/1356196: [162513.520834] #0: ffff8f3d576440e8 (&type->s_umount_key#62){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_supers+0x6f/0xf0 [162513.520838] 3 locks held by fsstress/1356197: [162513.520839] #0: ffff8f3d57644470 (sb_writers#15){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 [162513.520843] #1: ffff8f3d506465e8 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#10){++++}-{3:3}, at: path_openat+0x2a7/0xa50 [162513.520846] #2: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] [162513.520858] 2 locks held by btrfs/1356211: [162513.520859] #0: ffff8f3d810cde30 (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x52/0x711 [btrfs] [162513.520877] #1: ffff8f3d57644690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40e/0x5f0 [btrfs] This was weird because the stack traces show that a transaction commit, triggered by a device replace operation, is blocking trying to pause any running scrubs but there are no stack traces of blocked tasks doing a scrub. After poking around with drgn, I noticed there was a scrub task that was constantly running and blocking for shorts periods of time: >>> t = find_task(prog, 1356190) >>> prog.stack_trace(t) #0 __schedule+0x5ce/0xcfc #1 schedule+0x46/0xe4 #2 schedule_timeout+0x1df/0x475 #3 btrfs_reada_wait+0xda/0x132 #4 scrub_stripe+0x2a8/0x112f #5 scrub_chunk+0xcd/0x134 #6 scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x29e/0x5ee #7 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x2d5/0x91b #8 btrfs_ioctl+0x7f5/0x36e7 #9 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 torvalds#10 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x77 torvalds#11 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x156 Which corresponds to: int btrfs_reada_wait(void *handle) { struct reada_control *rc = handle; struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = rc->fs_info; while (atomic_read(&rc->elems)) { if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->reada_works_cnt)) reada_start_machine(fs_info); wait_event_timeout(rc->wait, atomic_read(&rc->elems) == 0, (HZ + 9) / 10); } (...) So the counter "rc->elems" was set to 1 and never decreased to 0, causing the scrub task to loop forever in that function. Then I used the following script for drgn to check the readahead requests: $ cat dump_reada.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) def dump_re(re): nzones = re.nzones.value_() print(f're at {hex(re.value_())}') print(f'\t logical {re.logical.value_()}') print(f'\t refcnt {re.refcnt.value_()}') print(f'\t nzones {nzones}') for i in range(nzones): dev = re.zones[i].device name = dev.name.str.string_() print(f'\t\t dev id {dev.devid.value_()} name {name}') print() for _, e in radix_tree_for_each(fs_info.reada_tree): re = cast('struct reada_extent *', e) dump_re(re) $ drgn dump_reada.py re at 0xffff8f3da9d25ad8 logical 38928384 refcnt 1 nzones 1 dev id 0 name b'/dev/sdd' $ So there was one readahead extent with a single zone corresponding to the source device of that last device replace operation logged in dmesg/syslog. Also the ID of that zone's device was 0 which is a special value set in the source device of a device replace operation when the operation finishes (constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID set at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()), confirming again that device /dev/sdd was the source of a device replace operation. Normally there should be as many zones in the readahead extent as there are devices, and I wasn't expecting the extent to be in a block group with a 'single' profile, so I went and confirmed with the following drgn script that there weren't any single profile block groups: $ cat dump_block_groups.py import sys import drgn from drgn import NULL, Object, cast, container_of, execscript, \ reinterpret, sizeof from drgn.helpers.linux import * mnt_path = b"/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1" mnt = None for mnt in for_each_mount(prog, dst = mnt_path): pass if mnt is None: sys.stderr.write(f'Error: mount point {mnt_path} not found\n') sys.exit(1) fs_info = cast('struct btrfs_fs_info *', mnt.mnt.mnt_sb.s_fs_info) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA = (1 << 0) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM = (1 << 1) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA = (1 << 2) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 = (1 << 3) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 = (1 << 4) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP = (1 << 5) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 = (1 << 6) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 = (1 << 7) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 = (1 << 8) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3 = (1 << 9) BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4 = (1 << 10) def bg_flags_string(bg): flags = bg.flags.value_() ret = '' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA: ret = 'data' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'meta' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM: if len(ret) > 0: ret += '|' ret += 'system' if flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0: ret += ' raid0' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1: ret += ' raid1' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP: ret += ' dup' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10: ret += ' raid10' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5: ret += ' raid5' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6: ret += ' raid6' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3: ret += ' raid1c3' elif flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4: ret += ' raid1c4' else: ret += ' single' return ret def dump_bg(bg): print() print(f'block group at {hex(bg.value_())}') print(f'\t start {bg.start.value_()} length {bg.length.value_()}') print(f'\t flags {bg.flags.value_()} - {bg_flags_string(bg)}') bg_root = fs_info.block_group_cache_tree.address_of_() for bg in rbtree_inorder_for_each_entry('struct btrfs_block_group', bg_root, 'cache_node'): dump_bg(bg) $ drgn dump_block_groups.py block group at 0xffff8f3d673b0400 start 22020096 length 16777216 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d53ddb400 start 38797312 length 536870912 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4d9c00 start 575668224 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d08189000 start 2723151872 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3db70ff000 start 2790260736 length 1073741824 flags 260 - meta raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d5f4dd800 start 3864002560 length 67108864 flags 258 - system raid6 block group at 0xffff8f3d67037000 start 3931111424 length 2147483648 flags 257 - data raid6 $ So there were only 2 reasons left for having a readahead extent with a single zone: reada_find_zone(), called when creating a readahead extent, returned NULL either because we failed to find the corresponding block group or because a memory allocation failed. With some additional and custom tracing I figured out that on every further ocurrence of the problem the block group had just been deleted when we were looping to create the zones for the readahead extent (at reada_find_extent()), so we ended up with only one zone in the readahead extent, corresponding to a device that ends up getting replaced. So after figuring that out it became obvious why the hang happens: 1) Task A starts a scrub on any device of the filesystem, except for device /dev/sdd; 2) Task B starts a device replace with /dev/sdd as the source device; 3) Task A calls btrfs_reada_add() from scrub_stripe() and it is currently starting to scrub a stripe from block group X. This call to btrfs_reada_add() is the one for the extent tree. When btrfs_reada_add() calls reada_add_block(), it passes the logical address of the extent tree's root node as its 'logical' argument - a value of 38928384; 4) Task A then enters reada_find_extent(), called from reada_add_block(). It finds there isn't any existing readahead extent for the logical address 38928384, so it proceeds to the path of creating a new one. It calls btrfs_map_block() to find out which stripes exist for the block group X. On the first iteration of the for loop that iterates over the stripes, it finds the stripe for device /dev/sdd, so it creates one zone for that device and adds it to the readahead extent. Before getting into the second iteration of the loop, the cleanup kthread deletes block group X because it was empty. So in the iterations for the remaining stripes it does not add more zones to the readahead extent, because the calls to reada_find_zone() returned NULL because they couldn't find block group X anymore. As a result the new readahead extent has a single zone, corresponding to the device /dev/sdd; 4) Before task A returns to btrfs_reada_add() and queues the readahead job for the readahead work queue, task B finishes the device replace and at btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() swaps the device /dev/sdd with the new device /dev/sdg; 5) Task A returns to reada_add_block(), which increments the counter "->elems" of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add(). Then it returns back to btrfs_reada_add() and calls reada_start_machine(). This queues a job in the readahead work queue to run the function reada_start_machine_worker(), which calls __reada_start_machine(). At __reada_start_machine() we take the device list mutex and for each device found in the current device list, we call reada_start_machine_dev() to start the readahead work. However at this point the device /dev/sdd was already freed and is not in the device list anymore. This means the corresponding readahead for the extent at 38928384 is never started, and therefore the "->elems" counter of the reada_control structure allocated at btrfs_reada_add() never goes down to 0, causing the call to btrfs_reada_wait(), done by the scrub task, to wait forever. Note that the readahead request can be made either after the device replace started or before it started, however in pratice it is very unlikely that a device replace is able to start after a readahead request is made and is able to complete before the readahead request completes - maybe only on a very small and nearly empty filesystem. This hang however is not the only problem we can have with readahead and device removals. When the readahead extent has other zones other than the one corresponding to the device that is being removed (either by a device replace or a device remove operation), we risk having a use-after-free on the device when dropping the last reference of the readahead extent. For example if we create a readahead extent with two zones, one for the device /dev/sdd and one for the device /dev/sde: 1) Before the readahead worker starts, the device /dev/sdd is removed, and the corresponding btrfs_device structure is freed. However the readahead extent still has the zone pointing to the device structure; 2) When the readahead worker starts, it only finds device /dev/sde in the current device list of the filesystem; 3) It starts the readahead work, at reada_start_machine_dev(), using the device /dev/sde; 4) Then when it finishes reading the extent from device /dev/sde, it calls __readahead_hook() which ends up dropping the last reference on the readahead extent through the last call to reada_extent_put(); 5) At reada_extent_put() it iterates over each zone of the readahead extent and attempts to delete an element from the device's 'reada_extents' radix tree, resulting in a use-after-free, as the device pointer of the zone for /dev/sdd is now stale. We can also access the device after dropping the last reference of a zone, through reada_zone_release(), also called by reada_extent_put(). And a device remove suffers the same problem, however since it shrinks the device size down to zero before removing the device, it is very unlikely to still have readahead requests not completed by the time we free the device, the only possibility is if the device has a very little space allocated. While the hang problem is exclusive to scrub, since it is currently the only user of btrfs_reada_add() and btrfs_reada_wait(), the use-after-free problem affects any path that triggers readhead, which includes btree_readahead_hook() and __readahead_hook() (a readahead worker can trigger readahed for the children of a node) for example - any path that ends up calling reada_add_block() can trigger the use-after-free after a device is removed. So fix this by waiting for any readahead requests for a device to complete before removing a device, ensuring that while waiting for existing ones no new ones can be made. This problem has been around for a very long time - the readahead code was added in 2011, device remove exists since 2008 and device replace was introduced in 2013, hard to pick a specific commit for a git Fixes tag. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit 7837fa8 upstream. Dave reported a problem with my rwsem conversion patch where we got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/76 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9d5d25df2530 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc+0x30/0x9c0 alloc_inode+0x81/0x90 iget_locked+0xcd/0x1a0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x210 sysfs_get_tree+0x1a/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x58/0x80 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x70/0xd0 kobject_add_internal+0xbb/0x2d0 kobject_add+0x7a/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x141/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1f1/0x8c0 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x981/0x1108 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0xe/0xb0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 fc_mount+0xe/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] check_committed_ref+0x69/0x200 [btrfs] btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x446/0x9b0 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x61/0x6a0 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0xae/0x160 [btrfs] __extent_writepage+0x262/0x420 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b6/0x510 [btrfs] extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x40/0xe0 __writeback_single_inode+0x62/0x610 writeback_sb_inodes+0x20f/0x500 wb_writeback+0xef/0x4a0 wb_do_writeback+0x49/0x2e0 wb_workfn+0x81/0x340 process_one_work+0x233/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x2c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x7de/0x850 [btrfs] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x8e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x367/0xbc0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x2db/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xd0b/0x2690 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/76: #0: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa40b8b58 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0 #2: ffff9d5d322390e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 76 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x30b/0x560 [btrfs] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750 kthread+0x137/0x150 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are still holding the path open when we start adding the sysfs files for the block groups, which creates a dependency on fs_reclaim via the tree lock. Fix this by dropping the path before we start doing anything with sysfs. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

commit d9befed upstream. The metadata buffer is no longer trusted after we read it from disk again because it is not uptodate for some reasons (e.g. failed to write back). Otherwise we may get below memory corruption problem in ext4_ext_split()->memset() if we read stale data from the newly allocated extent block on disk which has been failed to async write out but miss verify again since the verified bit has already been set on the buffer. [ 29.774674] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88841949d000 ... [ 29.783317] Oops: 0002 [#2] SMP [ 29.784219] R10: 00000000000f4240 R11: 0000000000002e28 R12: ffff88842fa1c800 [ 29.784627] CPU: 1 PID: 126 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Tainted: G D W [ 29.785546] R13: ffffffff9cddcc20 R14: ffffffff9cddd420 R15: ffff88842fa1c2f8 [ 29.786679] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),BIOS ?-20190727_0738364 [ 29.787588] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88842fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 29.789288] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn [ 29.790319] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 29.790321] (flush-8:0) [ 29.790844] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 00000004234f2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 29.791924] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 29.792839] RIP: 0010:__memset+0x24/0x30 [ 29.793739] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 29.794256] Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 f9 48 89 d1 83 e2 07 48 c1 e9 033 [ 29.795161] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ... [ 29.808149] Call Trace: [ 29.808475] ext4_ext_insert_extent+0x102e/0x1be0 [ 29.809085] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xa89/0x1bb0 [ 29.809652] ext4_map_blocks+0x290/0x8a0 [ 29.809085] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xa89/0x1bb0 [ 29.809652] ext4_map_blocks+0x290/0x8a0 [ 29.810161] ext4_writepages+0xc85/0x17c0 ... Fix this by clearing buffer's verified bit if we read meta block from disk again. Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924073337.861472-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 5223cc6 ] When enabling qgroups we walk the tree_root and then add a qgroup item for every root that we have. This creates a lock dependency on the tree_root and qgroup_root, which results in the following lockdep splat (with tree locks using rwsem), eg. in tests btrfs/017 or btrfs/022: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/24552 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9142dfc5f630 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_item+0x6e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_create_tree+0x1cb/0x240 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0xcd/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-quota-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by btrfs/24552: #0: ffff9142df431478 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0xa0 #1: ffff9142f9b10cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0x7b/0xe0 [btrfs] #2: ffff9142f9b11a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0x790 [btrfs] #3: ffff9142df431698 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x406/0x510 [btrfs] #4: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 24552 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1299 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30 validate_chain+0x491/0x750 __lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730 lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x140 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] down_read_nested+0x46/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] ? btrfs_root_node+0xd9/0x200 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs] btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fix this by dropping the path whenever we find a root item, add the qgroup item, and then re-lookup the root item we found and continue processing roots. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 49d11be ] I got the following lockdep splat with tree locks converted to rwsem patches on btrfs/104: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ torvalds#102 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/903 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8e7fab6ffe30 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 caching_thread+0x53/0x5a0 btrfs_work_helper+0xfa/0x520 process_one_work+0x238/0x540 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #2 (&caching_ctl->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7b0 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x1e0/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &caching_ctl->mutex --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&caching_ctl->mutex); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/903: #0: ffff8e7fab628838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff8e7faadac640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff8e7fab628a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 903 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ torvalds#102 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 BTRFS info (device sdb): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device sdb): has skinny extents This happens because qgroups does a backref lookup when we create a delayed ref. From here it may have to look up a root from an indirect ref, which does a normal lookup on the tree_root, which takes the read lock on the tree_root nodes. To fix this we need to add a variant for looking up roots that searches the commit root of the tree_root. Then when we do the backref search using the commit root we are sure to not take any locks on the tree_root nodes. This gets rid of the lockdep splat when running btrfs/104. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 22e4663 upstream. While doing memory hot-unplug operation on a PowerPC VM running 1024 CPUs with 11TB of ram, I hit the following panic: BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000007 Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000456048 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#2] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS= 2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp CPU: 160 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G D 5.9.0 #1 NIP: c000000000456048 LR: c000000000455fd4 CTR: c00000000047b350 REGS: c00006028d1b77a0 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G D (5.9.0) MSR: 8000000000009033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24004228 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c00000000000f1b0 DAR: 0000000000000007 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c000000000455fd4 c00006028d1b7a30 c000000001bec800 0000000000000000 GPR04: 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000000 00000000000374ef c00007c53df99320 GPR08: 000007c53c980000 0000000000000000 000007c53c980000 0000000000000000 GPR12: 0000000000004400 c00000001e8e4400 0000000000000000 0000000000000f6a GPR16: 0000000000000000 c000000001c25930 c000000001d62528 00000000000000c1 GPR20: c000000001d62538 c00006be469e9000 0000000fffffffe0 c0000000003c0ff8 GPR24: 0000000000000018 0000000000000000 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000000 GPR28: c00007c513755700 c000000001c236a4 c00007bc4001f800 0000000000000001 NIP [c000000000456048] __kmalloc_node+0x108/0x790 LR [c000000000455fd4] __kmalloc_node+0x94/0x790 Call Trace: kvmalloc_node+0x58/0x110 mem_cgroup_css_online+0x10c/0x270 online_css+0x48/0xd0 cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x2c4/0x470 cgroup_mkdir+0x408/0x5f0 kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x90/0x100 vfs_mkdir+0x138/0x250 do_mkdirat+0x154/0x1c0 system_call_exception+0xf8/0x200 system_call_common+0xf0/0x27c Instruction dump: e93e0000 e90d0030 39290008 7cc9402a e94d0030 e93e0000 7ce95214 7f89502a 2fbc0000 419e0018 41920230 e9270010 <89290007> 7f994800 419e0220 7ee6bb78 This pointing to the following code: mm/slub.c:2851 if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node))) { c000000000456038: 00 00 bc 2f cmpdi cr7,r28,0 c00000000045603c: 18 00 9e 41 beq cr7,c000000000456054 <__kmalloc_node+0x114> node_match(): mm/slub.c:2491 if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && page_to_nid(page) != node) c000000000456040: 30 02 92 41 beq cr4,c000000000456270 <__kmalloc_node+0x330> page_to_nid(): include/linux/mm.h:1294 c000000000456044: 10 00 27 e9 ld r9,16(r7) c000000000456048: 07 00 29 89 lbz r9,7(r9) <<<< r9 = NULL node_match(): mm/slub.c:2491 c00000000045604c: 00 48 99 7f cmpw cr7,r25,r9 c000000000456050: 20 02 9e 41 beq cr7,c000000000456270 <__kmalloc_node+0x330> The panic occurred in slab_alloc_node() when checking for the page's node: object = c->freelist; page = c->page; if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node))) { object = __slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, c); stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH); The issue is that object is not NULL while page is NULL which is odd but may happen if the cache flush happened after loading object but before loading page. Thus checking for the page pointer is required too. The cache flush is done through an inter processor interrupt when a piece of memory is off-lined. That interrupt is triggered when a memory hot-unplug operation is initiated and offline_pages() is calling the slub's MEM_GOING_OFFLINE callback slab_mem_going_offline_callback() which is calling flush_cpu_slab(). If that interrupt is caught between the reading of c->freelist and the reading of c->page, this could lead to such a situation. That situation is expected and the later call to this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() will detect the change to c->freelist and redo the whole operation. In commit 6159d0f ("mm/slub.c: page is always non-NULL in node_match()") check on the page pointer has been removed assuming that page is always valid when it is called. It happens that this is not true in that particular case, so check for page before calling node_match() here. Fixes: 6159d0f ("mm/slub.c: page is always non-NULL in node_match()") Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027190406.33283-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit e773ca7 ] Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result #8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605326106-55681-1-git-send-email-sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

modmaker added 11 commits May 13, 2012 19:47

Fixed compiletime warnings.

bf2dd84

Signed-off-by: Bas Laarhoven <sjml@xs4all.nl>

Fixed size of pinmux data array in EEPROM data struct.

1d90f9c

Signed-off-by: Bas Laarhoven <sjml@xs4all.nl>

Fixed debugfs mux output (always reporting pins as output)

27fc03f

Signed-off-by: Bas Laarhoven <sjml@xs4all.nl>

Implemented Bone Cape configuration from EEPROM. Only used for BEBOPR…

0633a3a

… cape for now. Signed-off-by: Bas Laarhoven <sjml@xs4all.nl>

Adding many of the missing signals to the mux table.

6c177da

Signed-off-by: Bas Laarhoven <sjml@xs4all.nl>

Added missing termination record to bone_pin_mux data.

2ca7fff

Signed-off-by: Bas Laarhoven <sjml@xs4all.nl>

Changed conditional code into runtime check to allow for multi-omap k…

41cb169

…ernels.

Replaced conditional debug code by pr_debug statements for cleaner code.

a5ddb28

Workaround for boards with (mistaken) ASCII interpretation for the nu…

4fbb580

…mpins field.

Use OMAP_ prefix instead of AM33XX_ for debugfs output to preserve co…

3701130

…mpatibility with existing programs.

Workaround for EEPROM contents blocking further I2C bus access.

c49bbe8

modmaker added 2 commits May 14, 2012 18:26

Fixed reversed part of LCD bus. Added even more missing entries (TBC).

8b461c5

Added check on EEPROM revision to prevent interpreting unknown formats.

781d028

koenkooi closed this May 21, 2012

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

BeagleBone configuration from Cape EEPROM #2

BeagleBone configuration from Cape EEPROM #2

modmaker commented May 13, 2012

koenkooi commented May 21, 2012

BeagleBone configuration from Cape EEPROM #2

BeagleBone configuration from Cape EEPROM #2

Conversation

modmaker commented May 13, 2012

koenkooi commented May 21, 2012