Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revert "Option to run kibana from build for CI" #19224

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2018
Merged

Revert "Option to run kibana from build for CI" #19224

merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2018

Conversation

rhoboat
Copy link

@rhoboat rhoboat commented May 18, 2018

Reverts #19125

@rhoboat rhoboat merged commit eaa4960 into master May 18, 2018
rhoboat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2018
@archanid
Revert "Option to run kibana from build for CI" (#19224)
05640a3 
* Revert "[DOCS] Removes redundant index.asciidoc files (#19192)"

This reverts commit d11b5aa.

* Revert "[typescript] add typescript support for the server and browser (#19104)"

This reverts commit c611206.

* Revert "Option to run kibana from build for CI (#19125)"

This reverts commit 5969860.
rhoboat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2018
@archanid
Revert "Option to run kibana from build for CI" (#19224)
ccefa30 
* Revert "[DOCS] Removes redundant index.asciidoc files (#19192)"

This reverts commit d11b5aa.

* Revert "[typescript] add typescript support for the server and browser (#19104)"

This reverts commit c611206.

* Revert "Option to run kibana from build for CI (#19125)"

This reverts commit 5969860.
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

@epixa epixa deleted the revert-19125-xpack-ci-build-kibana branch May 23, 2018 12:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@rhoboat @elasticmachine @archanid