Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing test: Chrome X-Pack UI Functional Tests.x-pack/test/functional/apps/dashboard/group3/reporting/screenshots·ts - dashboard Reporting Dashboard Reporting Screenshots Sample data from Kibana 7.6 PNG file matches the baseline image #142484

Closed
kibanamachine opened this issue Oct 3, 2022 · 15 comments · Fixed by #163966
Labels
(Deprecated) Feature:Reporting Use Reporting:Screenshot, Reporting:CSV, or Reporting:Framework instead failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:SharedUX Team label for AppEx-SharedUX (formerly Global Experience)

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented Oct 3, 2022

A test failed on a tracked branch

Error: expected 0.11965814144852517 to be below 0.09
    at Assertion.assert (node_modules/@kbn/expect/expect.js:100:11)
    at Assertion.lessThan.Assertion.below (node_modules/@kbn/expect/expect.js:336:8)
    at Function.lessThan (node_modules/@kbn/expect/expect.js:531:15)
    at Context.<anonymous> (x-pack/test/functional/apps/dashboard/group3/reporting/screenshots.ts:316:35)
    at Object.apply (node_modules/@kbn/test/target_node/src/functional_test_runner/lib/mocha/wrap_function.js:87:16)

First failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label Oct 3, 2022
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Oct 3, 2022
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-reporting-services (Team:Reporting Services)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Oct 3, 2022
@petrklapka petrklapka added (Deprecated) Feature:Reporting Use Reporting:Screenshot, Reporting:CSV, or Reporting:Framework instead Team:SharedUX Team label for AppEx-SharedUX (formerly Global Experience) and removed Team:Reporting Services labels Oct 24, 2022
@tsullivan
Copy link
Member

Closing, as this seems to have been a one-time issue.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@jbudz
Copy link
Member

jbudz commented Mar 30, 2023

/skip

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skipped

main: 036fe0e

@tsullivan
Copy link
Member

I'm looking at this today, and I find that it's the downloads a PDF file: large dashboard that is responsible for the failures. The report is generated, but the results usually bad (blank areas in the PNG, empty data in charts).

There appears to be a dimensional limit to Dashboards that can be safely captured. I think we shouldn't be that surprised, since there are probably millions of DOM elements on this screen.

@tsullivan
Copy link
Member

the results usually bad (blank areas in the PNG, empty data in charts).

Artifact of #138812

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
(Deprecated) Feature:Reporting Use Reporting:Screenshot, Reporting:CSV, or Reporting:Framework instead failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:SharedUX Team label for AppEx-SharedUX (formerly Global Experience)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants