Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(api)!: use cometbft's MockPV. #5709

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

DimitrisJim
Copy link
Contributor

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim commented Jan 24, 2024

Description

closes: #4015

Commit Message / Changelog Entry

refactor!: use cometbft's mock private validator

see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a commit message to be used for the changelog entry in the PR description for review.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer.
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

@@ -520,9 +518,9 @@ func (s *ClientTestSuite) extractChainPrivateKeys(ctx context.Context, chain ibc
})

for _, filePV := range filePvs {
pvs = append(pvs, &ibcmock.PV{
PrivKey: &ed25519.PrivKey{Key: filePV.PrivKey.Bytes()},
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems this was initially done since a ed25519.PrivKey type exists in both sdk and comet and had to initialize by directly grabbing the bytes.

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim added the testing Testing package and unit/integration tests label Jan 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@colin-axner colin-axner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lots of red, 😃 thanks for the pr @DimitrisJim ❤️


// MockPV implements PrivValidator without any safety or persistence.
// Only use it for testing.
type PV struct {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should document in the migration notes the removal of this type, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

definitely should! do you want to push it real quick? If not, can do in 5'.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I can do it.

Copy link
Member

@damiannolan damiannolan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙏🏻

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim changed the title Use cometbft's MockPV. refactor!: use cometbft's MockPV. Jan 25, 2024
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega changed the title refactor!: use cometbft's MockPV. refactor(api)!: use cometbft's MockPV. Jan 25, 2024
@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim merged commit e475064 into main Jan 25, 2024
78 of 79 checks passed
@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim deleted the jim/4015-use-cometbft-mock-pv branch January 25, 2024 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
testing Testing package and unit/integration tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use cometbft MockPV instead of reimplemting our own
4 participants