Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use cometbft MockPV instead of reimplemting our own #4015

Closed
3 tasks
colin-axner opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5709
Closed
3 tasks

Use cometbft MockPV instead of reimplemting our own #4015

colin-axner opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5709
Assignees
Labels
testing Testing package and unit/integration tests type: refactor Architecture, code or CI improvements that may or may not tackle technical debt.

Comments

@colin-axner
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

If possible we should use cmttypes.MockPV instead of our own custom type

We used to rely on this type, but during one of the tendermint updates it was made private. It seems like it is public again, and I think it makes sense to use. Otherwise we are just duplicating that code anyways


For Admin Use

  • Not duplicate issue
  • Appropriate labels applied
  • Appropriate contributors tagged/assigned
@colin-axner colin-axner added testing Testing package and unit/integration tests type: refactor Architecture, code or CI improvements that may or may not tackle technical debt. labels Jul 5, 2023
@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim self-assigned this Jan 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
testing Testing package and unit/integration tests type: refactor Architecture, code or CI improvements that may or may not tackle technical debt.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants