WIP: Implement feature flags for Search Block

docs/designers-developers/developers/feature-flags.md

@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+# Feature Flags
+
+With phase 2 of the Gutenberg project there's a need for improved control over how code changes are released. Newer features developed for phase 2 and beyond should only be released to the Gutenberg plugin, while improvements and bug fixes should still continue to make their way into core releases.
+
+The technique for handling this is known as a 'feature flag'. 
+
+## Introducing `process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE`
+
+The `process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE` is an environment variable containing a number that represents the phase. When the codebase is built for the plugin, this variable will be set to `2`. When building for core, it will be set to `1`.
+
+## Basic Use
+
+A phase 2 function or constant should be exported using the following ternary syntax:
+
+```js
+function myPhaseTwoFeature() {
+	// implementation
+}
+
+export const phaseTwoFeature = process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE === 2 ? myPhaseTwoFeature : undefined;
+```
+
+In phase 1 environments the `phaseTwoFeature` export will be `undefined`.
+
+If you're attempting to import and call a phase 2 feature, be sure to wrap the call to the function in an if statement to avoid an error:
+```js
+import { phaseTwoFeature } from '@wordpress/foo';
+
+if ( process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE === 2) {
+	phaseTwoFeature();
+}
+```
+
+### How it works
+
+During the webpack build, any instances of `process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE` will be replaced using webpack's define plugin (https://webpack.js.org/plugins/define-plugin/).
+
+If you write the following code:
+```js
+if ( process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE === 2 ) {
+	phaseTwoFeature();
+}
+```
+
+When building the codebase for the plugin the variable will be replaced with the number literal `2`:
+```js
+if ( 2 === 2 ) {
+	phaseTwoFeature();
+}
+```
+
+Any code within the body of the if statement will be executed within the gutenberg plugin since `2 === 2` evaluates to `true`.
+
+For core, the `process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE` variable is replaced with `1`, so the built code will look like:
+```js
+if ( 1 === 2 ) {
+	phaseTwoFeature();
+}
+```
+
+`1 === 2` evaluates to false so the phase 2 feature will not be executed within core.
+
+### Dead Code Elimination
+
+When building code for production, webpack 'minifies' code (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minification_(programming)), removing the amount of unnecessary JavaScript as much as possible. One of the steps involves something known as 'dead code elimination'. 
+
+When the following code is encountered, webpack determines that the surrounding `if`statement is unnecessary:
+```js
+if ( 2 === 2 ) {
+	phaseTwoFeature();
+}
+```
+
+ The condition will alway evaluates to `true`, so can be removed leaving just the code in the body:
+ ```js
+ phaseTwoFeature();
+ ```
+
+Similarly when building for core, the condition in the following `if` statement always resolves to false:
+```js
+if ( 1 === 2 ) {
+	phaseTwoFeature();
+}
+```
+
+The minification process will remove the entire `if` statement including the body, ensuring code destined for phase 2 is not included in the built JavaScript intended for core.
+
+## FAQ
+
+#### Why should I only use `===` or `!==` when comparing `process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE` and not `>`, `>=`, `<` or `<=`?
+
+This is a restriction due to the behaviour of the greater than or less than operators in JavaScript when `process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE` is undefined, as might be the case for third party users of WordPress npm packages. Both `process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE < 2` and `process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE > 1` resolve to false. When writing `if ( process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE > 1 )`, the intention might be to avoid executing the phase 2 code in the following `if` statement's body. That's fine since it will evaluate to false. 
+
+However, the following code doesn't quite have the intended behaviour:
+
+```
+function myPhaseTwoFeature() {
+	if ( process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE < 2 ) {
+		return;
+	}
+
+	// implementation of phase 2 feature
+}
+```
+
+Here an early return is used to avoid execution of a phase 2 feature, but because the `if` condition resolves to false, the early return is bypassed and the phase 2 feature is incorrectly triggered.
+
+#### Why shouldn't I assign the result of an expression involving `GUTENBERG_PHASE` to a variable, e.g. `const isMyFeatureActive = process.env.GUTENBERG_PHASE === 2`?
+
+The aim here is to avoid introducing any complexity that could result in webpack's minifier not being able to eliminate dead code. See the [Dead Code Elimination](#dead-code-elimination) section for further details.

docs/manifest.json

@@ -107,6 +107,12 @@
 		"markdown_source": "https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/master/docs/designers-developers/developers/accessibility.md",
 		"parent": "developers"
 	},
+	{
+		"title": "Feature Flags",
+		"slug": "feature-flags",
+		"markdown_source": "https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/master/docs/designers-developers/developers/feature-flags.md",
+		"parent": "developers"
+	},
 	{
 		"title": "Data Module Reference",
 		"slug": "data",

docs/toc.json

@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 			]},
 			{"docs/designers-developers/developers/internationalization.md": []},
 			{"docs/designers-developers/developers/accessibility.md": []},
+			{"docs/designers-developers/developers/feature-flags.md": []},
 			{"docs/designers-developers/developers/data/README.md": "{{data}}"},
 			{"docs/designers-developers/developers/packages.md": "{{packages}}"},
 			{"packages/components/README.md": "{{components}}"},