Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OPSEXP-1035 Updated ActiveMQ to 5.16.4 #661

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 22, 2022
Merged

Conversation

mteodori
Copy link
Member

@mteodori mteodori commented Mar 2, 2022

@pr-triage pr-triage bot added the PR: draft label Mar 2, 2022
@mteodori mteodori closed this Mar 2, 2022
@mteodori mteodori force-pushed the OPSEXP-1035-update-activemq branch from 93a99a7 to 6a8d4bd Compare March 2, 2022 20:21
@mteodori mteodori reopened this Mar 2, 2022
@mteodori mteodori force-pushed the OPSEXP-1035-update-activemq branch from a1e6ae6 to daedd0c Compare March 4, 2022 21:05
@mteodori mteodori marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2022 14:59
@mteodori mteodori force-pushed the OPSEXP-1035-update-activemq branch 2 times, most recently from f689fdb to ecb4347 Compare March 17, 2022 19:27
Copy link
Contributor

@alxgomz alxgomz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm worried about the fact that image comes from yet another sources which seems to be using a customized openjdk. Note I don't know the details of their customization so it could even be better than the vanilla one... But I' must highlighting that we (or at least I) know so few about it.

@mteodori mteodori force-pushed the OPSEXP-1035-update-activemq branch from ecb4347 to 38ffee5 Compare March 22, 2022 01:38
@mteodori mteodori changed the title OPSEXP-1035 use updated external activemq OPSEXP-1035 Updated ActiveMQ to 5.16.4 Mar 22, 2022
@mteodori
Copy link
Member Author

I'm worried about the fact that image comes from yet another sources which seems to be using a customized openjdk. Note I don't know the details of their customization so it could even be better than the vanilla one... But I' must highlighting that we (or at least I) know so few about it.

reverted to our updated ActiveMQ until the official image is available with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8149

@mteodori mteodori enabled auto-merge (squash) March 22, 2022 08:40
@mteodori mteodori disabled auto-merge March 22, 2022 09:27
@mteodori mteodori merged commit 1621ae7 into master Mar 22, 2022
@mteodori mteodori deleted the OPSEXP-1035-update-activemq branch March 22, 2022 09:27
@pr-triage pr-triage bot added the PR: merged label Mar 22, 2022
montgolfiere added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2022
…r_compose

* master:
  OPSEXP-1374: Fix ooi and ms teams service - http 404 error (#684)
  fix formating error in doc [skip ci]
  OPSEXP-1348 use ACS_VERSION for build stages (#683)
  OPSEXP-1339 Update ingress-nginx to 4.x for k8s 1.22 (#682)
  OPSEXP-1226: Alfresco Control Center in ACS Deployment - docker-compose (#681)
  OPSEXP-933: Add node selector for deployments on ACS Helm Chart (#673)
  ACS-2671 Update alfresco-ai-docker-engine to 1.4.2 (#680)
  OPSEXP-1343 Remove 6.1.x config files (#679)
  OPSEXP-1035 Updated ActiveMQ to 5.16.4 (#661)
  ACS-2671 Pick up GA versions of Repo and Share in 7.2.0 (#678)

# Conflicts:
#	docker-compose/community-docker-compose.yml
#	docker-compose/docker-compose.yml
alxgomz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants