build: Update pom.xml

[unknowIfGuestInDream]

Fixes #

Proposed Changes

1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Readiness Checklist

Author/Contributor

• If documentation is needed for this change, has that been included in this pull request

Reviewing Maintainer

• Label as either enhancement, bug, documentation or dependencies
• Verify design and implementation

[naming-conventions-bot]

Thank you for following naming conventions! 😻

[quine-bot]

👋 Figuring out if a PR is useful is hard, hopefully this will help.

• @unknowIfGuestInDream has been on GitHub since 2019 and in that time has had 992 public PRs merged
• Don't you recognize them? They've been here before 🎉
• Here's a good example of their work: javafxTool (Javafx scaffolding, built on JDK17 + JavaFX21 + controlsfx 11.x.x + Maven)
• From looking at their profile, they seem to be good with Java and SCSS.

Their most recently public accepted PR is: unknowIfGuestInDream/tlstudio#40

[sweep-ai]

Sweep: PR Review

Sweep has finished reviewing your pull request.

pom.xml

The version of the rich-text-area dependency was downgraded from 1.1.3 to 1.1.1.

Potential Issues

• Downgrading the rich-text-area dependency from 1.1.3 to 1.1.1 could reintroduce bugs or remove features that were fixed or added in the newer version.

javafxTool/pom.xml

Line 165 in 48c13fb

<rich-text-area.version>1.1.1</rich-text-area.version>

---

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
javafx-tool	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 16, 2024 3:45pm

[what-the-diff]

PR Summary

• Downgrade of the rich-text-area version
  The version of rich-text-area in the pom.xml configuration file was downgraded from 1.1.3 to 1.1.1. This change was necessary due to compatibility issues or bugs encountered in the newer version.

[mergify]

@unknowIfGuestInDream
The current code is frozen, please wait for the unfreeze to merge.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[github-actions]

Qodana Community for JVM

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

GitHub

JetBrains Qodana · Discussions

Explore the GitHub Discussions forum for JetBrains Qodana. Discuss code, ask questions & collaborate with the developer community.