feat:Add Interfaces and Methods to Ideogram Namespace for Enhanced API Functionality #5
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new interfaces and methods within the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.CreateApiKey.g.cs (1)
7-13: LGTM, but consider adding documentation for the exception.The method signature looks good:
- The asynchronous design allows for non-blocking API key creation.
- The
CancellationTokenparameter enables cancellation of the operation.- The
PostApiKeyResponsereturn type suggests a RESTful design.However, consider adding documentation for the specific circumstances under which the
InvalidOperationExceptionmay be thrown to improve clarity for consumers of this API.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.GetApiKeys.g.cs (1)
12-13: Enhance the exception documentation.The
GetApiKeysAsyncmethod is declared correctly with appropriate return type, parameters, and XML comments. However, consider adding more details to the<exception>tag to clarify the specific conditions under which theInvalidOperationExceptionis thrown. This will help developers better understand and handle the exception.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IVisionClient.g.cs (1)
13-16: Add a description to the summary comment.The
JsonSerializerContextproperty has an empty summary comment. Please provide a brief description of the property's purpose to improve code documentation.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IGenerateClient.PostUpscaleImage.g.cs (2)
15-17: LGTM!The method signature follows the standard asynchronous pattern in C# and accepts appropriate parameters for the image upscaling operation. The use of
UpscaleImageRequestandCancellationTokenaligns with the method's purpose and provides flexibility to the caller.Consider the following suggestions:
- Ensure that the
UpscaleImageRequestclass encapsulates all the necessary information required for the upscaling operation, such as the image data, desired dimensions, and any additional options.- Consider providing an overload that accepts the image data directly (e.g., as a byte array or stream) to allow for more granular control over the image being processed.
- Document any specific exceptions that can be thrown by this method to help callers handle errors appropriately.
35-39: LGTM!This overload of
PostUpscaleImageAsyncprovides more flexibility by accepting the image data directly as a byte array, along with theUpscaleInitialImageRequestobject and the image filename. This allows callers to have more control over the image being processed.Consider the following suggestions:
- Ensure that the
UpscaleInitialImageRequestclass encapsulates any additional options or settings required for the upscaling operation.- Validate the
imageFileparameter to ensure it represents a valid image format supported by the upscaling functionality (e.g., JPEG, PNG, WEBP).- Consider adding a parameter for the image format or content type to explicitly specify the format of the provided image data.
- Document any specific exceptions that can be thrown by this method to help callers handle errors appropriately.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (21)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.GenerateClient.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IGenerateClient.PostGenerateImage.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IGenerateClient.PostRemixImage.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IGenerateClient.PostUpscaleImage.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IGenerateClient.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IIdeogramApi.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.CreateApiKey.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.DeleteSingleApiKey.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.GetApiKeys.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.GetApiStripeSubscription.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.GetApiSubscription.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.GetApiTerms.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.PostApiSubscription.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.PostApiTerms.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.ReactivateSubscription.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IVisionClient.PostDescribe.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IVisionClient.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IdeogramApi.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.ManageClient.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.VisionClient.g.cs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (30)
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.CreateApiKey.g.cs (1)
5-14: LGTM!The use of a partial interface allows for a modular design, and defining it within the
Ideogramnamespace helps to organize related types.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IGenerateClient.g.cs (1)
1-20: LGTM!The new
IGenerateClientinterface is well-defined and documented. It provides a clear contract for generating content and managing resources. TheJsonSerializerContextproperty allows flexibility in JSON serialization and deserialization. ImplementingIDisposableensures proper resource management and cleanup.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.GetApiKeys.g.cs (1)
5-14: LGTM!The
IManageClientinterface is declared correctly with appropriate access modifiers.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.GetApiTerms.g.cs (2)
5-6: LGTM!The use of a partial public interface is a good design choice for modular code organization and external consumption.
7-13: LGTM!The
GetApiTermsAsyncmethod is well-designed:
- The asynchronous signature allows for non-blocking retrieval of API terms.
- The
CancellationTokenparameter enables cooperative cancellation, which is a best practice.- The XML documentation improves usability and maintainability.
The
InvalidOperationExceptionsuggests that there might be specific preconditions or state requirements for calling this method. Consider documenting these conditions, if any, to help consumers use the method correctly.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IVisionClient.g.cs (2)
1-5: LGTM!The code segment enables nullable reference types and declares the
Ideogramnamespace correctly.
6-11: LGTM!The
IVisionClientinterface is declared correctly with a clear summary comment. ImplementingIDisposableis a good practice for managing resources.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.g.cs (1)
1-20: LGTM!The introduction of the
IManageClientinterface provides a well-structured approach to manage API accounts and access. The interface is designed to be extensible and follows good practices by implementingIDisposablefor proper resource management.The
JsonSerializerContextproperty is a valuable addition that enables efficient serialization and deserialization of data when interacting with the API. This can lead to improved performance and reduced overhead in data handling.The documentation comments are clear and informative, providing guidance on the behavior of the interface and enhancing usability for developers working with the API.
Overall, these changes contribute to a more robust and developer-friendly API design.
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.DeleteSingleApiKey.g.cs (1)
5-16: LGTM!The
IManageClientinterface and theDeleteSingleApiKeyAsyncmethod are well-defined and follow best practices:
- The interface is declared as partial, allowing for extension in other files if needed.
- The method name clearly conveys its purpose of deleting a single API key asynchronously.
- The
apiKeyIdparameter is used to identify the API key to be deleted.- The optional
cancellationTokenparameter allows for cancellation of the operation if required.- The method returns a
Task, which is the standard way to define asynchronous methods in C#.- The potential
InvalidOperationExceptionis documented using the<exception>tag, providing clear information to the user.Overall, the code is clean, well-structured, and follows C# conventions and best practices for defining interfaces and asynchronous methods.
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.GetApiSubscription.g.cs (2)
5-6: LGTM!The partial interface declaration is well-structured and follows good coding practices.
7-13: LGTM!The
GetApiSubscriptionAsyncmethod is well-designed and follows best practices for asynchronous programming. The XML documentation provides clear information about the method's purpose and the exception it may throw, enhancing the code's readability and maintainability.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.ReactivateSubscription.g.cs (1)
5-14: LGTM!The interface and method declaration are well-structured and follow best practices:
- The interface is declared as partial, allowing for extension in other files if needed.
- The method
ReactivateSubscriptionAsynchas a clear purpose and is designed to reactivate a subscription by re-enabling Metronome billing.- The method accepts a
CancellationTokenparameter, enabling cancellation of the operation if required.- The method returns a
Task<PostApiReactivateResponse>, indicating that it is an asynchronous operation and the expected response type.- The method is documented with a summary and an exception, providing clarity on its intended use and error handling.
Overall, the code changes are well-implemented and adhere to good coding practices.
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.GetApiStripeSubscription.g.cs (1)
1-17: LGTM!The
GetApiStripeSubscriptionAsyncmethod is a well-defined addition to theIManageClientinterface. The method signature, parameters, and exception declaration are clear and appropriate for the purpose of retrieving data relevant to connecting to Stripe.The code changes enhance the functionality of the
IManageClientinterface by providing a clear contract for Stripe subscription management.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IIdeogramApi.g.cs (5)
11-34: LGTM! TheIIdeogramApiinterface provides a well-structured API definition.The
IIdeogramApiinterface establishes a clear contract for interacting with the Ideogram AI API, promoting modularity and ease of use in API consumption. The interface is designed to facilitate interactions with the Ideogram AI system, providing a structured way to manage various functionalities related to content generation, API account management, and visual content understanding.The interface implements
IDisposable, indicating potential resource management requirements for the underlying HTTP client used for API calls. This is a good practice to ensure proper resource cleanup and prevent resource leaks.The interface exposes three public properties:
Generate,Manage, andVision, each represented by their respective client classes. This separation of concerns allows for a more focused and organized API structure, making it easier for developers to navigate and utilize the specific functionality they need.Overall, the
IIdeogramApiinterface is well-designed and provides a solid foundation for interacting with the Ideogram AI API.
16-16: LGTM! TheJsonSerializerContextproperty is essential for JSON serialization.The
JsonSerializerContextproperty is crucial for handling JSON serialization within the API. It allows for customization and configuration of the JSON serialization process, providing flexibility to consumers of the API.By exposing the property as public with a getter and a setter, the API enables developers to modify the serialization context as needed, allowing for fine-grained control over the JSON serialization behavior.
This property is a valuable addition to the
IIdeogramApiinterface, as it promotes extensibility and adaptability in handling JSON serialization within the API.
22-22: LGTM! TheGenerateproperty exposes content generation functionality.The
Generateproperty represents theGenerateClientclass, which is responsible for operations related to content generation. By exposing this property as public with a getter, the API allows consumers to easily access and utilize the content generation functionality provided by theGenerateClient.The inclusion of XML documentation comments for the property is a good practice, as it provides a clear description of the property's purpose, improving the API's usability and discoverability.
This property is a valuable addition to the
IIdeogramApiinterface, as it encapsulates the content generation functionality and makes it readily available to developers consuming the API.
27-27: LGTM! TheManageproperty exposes API account and access management functionality.The
Manageproperty represents theManageClientclass, which is responsible for operations related to managing API account and API access. By exposing this property as public with a getter, the API allows consumers to easily access and utilize the account and access management functionality provided by theManageClient.The inclusion of XML documentation comments for the property is a good practice, as it provides a clear description of the property's purpose, improving the API's usability and discoverability.
This property is a valuable addition to the
IIdeogramApiinterface, as it encapsulates the API account and access management functionality and makes it readily available to developers consuming the API.
32-32: LGTM! TheVisionproperty exposes visual content understanding functionality.The
Visionproperty represents theVisionClientclass, which is responsible for operations related to understanding visual content. By exposing this property as public with a getter, the API allows consumers to easily access and utilize the visual content understanding functionality provided by theVisionClient.The inclusion of XML documentation comments for the property is a good practice, as it provides a clear description of the property's purpose, improving the API's usability and discoverability.
This property is a valuable addition to the
IIdeogramApiinterface, as it encapsulates the visual content understanding functionality and makes it readily available to developers consuming the API.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.PostApiTerms.g.cs (2)
13-15: LGTM!The method signature and XML documentation are well-defined. The
CancellationTokenparameter has a default value, making it optional. The exception is properly documented using the<exception>tag.
26-28: LGTM!The method signature and XML documentation are well-defined. The
CancellationTokenparameter has a default value, making it optional. The exception is properly documented using the<exception>tag. The example value for thetermsIdparameter is helpful for understanding the expected format.src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IVisionClient.PostDescribe.g.cs (1)
5-28: LGTM!The
IVisionClientinterface is well-designed and provides a clean contract for image description functionality. The twoPostDescribeAsyncmethods offer flexibility in terms of input, allowing for both structured requests and raw image data. The use of asynchronous methods and cancellation tokens enables efficient and interruptible operations, while the exception handling ensures proper error management.The interface enhances the capabilities of the API by providing a standardized way to process image descriptions, catering to different use cases and requirements. The asynchronous design and cancellation support contribute to the overall performance and responsiveness of the system.
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IManageClient.PostApiSubscription.g.cs (1)
5-28: LGTM!The
IManageClientinterface is well-designed and implemented. It provides a clean and structured way to manage API subscriptions. The methods are properly documented, and the exception handling ensures proper error communication to the callers. The use ofCancellationTokenallows for operation cancellation, enhancing the overall functionality.Great job!
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IGenerateClient.PostGenerateImage.g.cs (2)
14-16: LGTM!The
PostGenerateImageAsyncmethod follows the standard asynchronous pattern in C# and provides a clear contract for generating images based on a given request. The method signature, parameters, and return type are well-defined and align with the purpose of the method.The documentation comment provides sufficient information about the method's behavior, including the potential exception that may be thrown.
25-27: Verify the need for two separate methods and ensure consistent error handling.The
PostGenerateImageAsyncmethod with theImageRequestparameter seems to serve a similar purpose as the previousPostGenerateImageAsyncmethod with theGenerateImageRequestparameter. Both methods generate images based on a given request and return aGenerateImageResponseasynchronously.Consider the following:
- Verify if having two separate methods with similar functionality is necessary. If the
ImageRequestandGenerateImageRequestobjects serve different purposes or have distinct use cases, then having separate methods may be justified. Otherwise, consider consolidating them into a single method to avoid duplication.- Ensure that both methods handle errors consistently. The documentation comments mention that an
InvalidOperationExceptionmay be thrown, but it's important to verify that the conditions under which this exception is thrown are consistent between the two methods. Inconsistent error handling can lead to confusion and make the API harder to use correctly.To verify the points mentioned above, you can run the following script:
This script will help you determine if the two request types are used distinctly and if the error handling is consistent in both method implementations.
Verification successful
Verified: Two methods serve distinct purposes with consistent error handling.
The codebase contains two
PostGenerateImageAsyncmethods for valid reasons:
- The method taking
GenerateImageRequestprovides full flexibility for advanced use cases.- The method taking
ImageRequestoffers a simpler interface for basic image generation requests, acting as a convenience wrapper around the more complex method.Error handling is consistent across both methods, with both throwing
InvalidOperationExceptionfor HTTP request exceptions and deserialization failures. This addresses the concern raised in the original review comment.The usage of the
ImageRequestversion in the test file suggests that this simpler interface is preferred for most use cases, while still allowing access to the more advanced functionality when needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of ImageRequest and GenerateImageRequest in the codebase echo "Searching for usage of ImageRequest and GenerateImageRequest..." rg --type cs 'ImageRequest|GenerateImageRequest' # Search for InvalidOperationException being thrown in the implementation of both methods echo "Searching for InvalidOperationException in the method implementations..." rg --type cs -A 10 'PostGenerateImageAsync.*InvalidOperationException'Length of output: 6809
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of both PostGenerateImageAsync methods echo "Searching for PostGenerateImageAsync implementations..." rg --type cs -A 20 'PostGenerateImageAsync' # Search for error handling mechanisms in the Generate client or its base classes echo "Searching for error handling mechanisms..." rg --type cs -A 10 'throw new|catch \(|Exception' # Search for usage examples of both PostGenerateImageAsync methods echo "Searching for usage examples of PostGenerateImageAsync..." rg --type cs 'PostGenerateImageAsync\('Length of output: 105360
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.GenerateClient.g.cs (1)
Line range hint
13-24:JsonSerializerContextproperty added for JSON serialization.The
JsonSerializerContextproperty is used for JSON serialization and deserialization. It is set to a default value fromSourceGenerationContext.Default.This property provides an extension point for customizing the JSON serialization behavior of the class.
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.VisionClient.g.cs (1)
11-11: Verify the implementation of theIVisionClientinterface.The change in the class declaration is approved. However, ensure that the
VisionClientclass implements all the members defined in theIVisionClientinterface to avoid compile-time errors.Run the following script to verify the interface implementation:
Verification successful
Implementation of
IVisionClientinterface verifiedThe
VisionClientclass correctly implements all members of theIVisionClientinterface, including both overloads of thePostDescribeAsyncmethod. The implementation is found in theIdeogram.VisionClient.PostDescribe.g.csfile, which is part of the partial class declaration. The methods are public, async, and returnTask<DescribeResponse>as required by the interface.
- The main
PostDescribeAsyncmethod takes aDescribeRequestparameter and contains the core implementation logic.- The overload method with optional
imageFileandimageFilenameparameters creates aDescribeRequestand calls the main method.The implementation includes proper error handling, request preparation, and response processing, ensuring that the
VisionClientclass fully adheres to theIVisionClientinterface contract.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `VisionClient` class implements all the members defined in the `IVisionClient` interface. # Test: Search for the interface declaration. Expect: The interface declaration exists. rg --type cs $'interface IVisionClient' # Test: Search for the interface members. Expect: All interface members are implemented in the `VisionClient` class. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'interface IVisionClient { $$$ }'Length of output: 351
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract members of IVisionClient interface and VisionClient class for comparison # Extract IVisionClient interface members echo "IVisionClient interface members:" ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'interface IVisionClient { $$$ }' echo "---" # Extract VisionClient class members echo "VisionClient class members:" ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'class VisionClient : global::Ideogram.IVisionClient, global::System.IDisposable { $$$ }'Length of output: 352
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify file contents and search for interface and class members # Check if the files exist and show their content echo "File contents:" for file in src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IVisionClient.g.cs src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IVisionClient.PostDescribe.g.cs src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.VisionClient.g.cs; do echo "--- $file ---" cat "$file" 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found" echo done echo "---" # Search for IVisionClient members using a more flexible pattern echo "IVisionClient members:" rg -U "interface IVisionClient.*?\{([\s\S]*?)\}" -r '$1' --type cs echo "---" # Search for VisionClient members using a more flexible pattern echo "VisionClient members:" rg -U "class VisionClient.*?\{([\s\S]*?)\}" -r '$1' --type csLength of output: 5685
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for PostDescribeAsync implementations in VisionClient echo "Searching for PostDescribeAsync implementations in VisionClient:" rg -U "public.*?Task<.*?DescribeResponse>.*?PostDescribeAsync.*?\(.*?\).*?\{.*?\}" --type cs echo "---" echo "Searching for partial VisionClient class declarations:" rg "partial class VisionClient" --type csLength of output: 678
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine VisionClient.PostDescribe.g.cs for PostDescribeAsync implementations echo "Contents of Ideogram.VisionClient.PostDescribe.g.cs:" cat src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.VisionClient.PostDescribe.g.cs echo "---" echo "Searching for PostDescribeAsync methods with a more flexible pattern:" rg -U "public\s+.*?Task<.*?DescribeResponse>\s+PostDescribeAsync.*?{[\s\S]*?}" src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.VisionClient.PostDescribe.g.csLength of output: 6361
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.ManageClient.g.cs (1)
11-11: LGTM! The change improves the design by adhering to the Interface Segregation Principle.The modification of the
ManageClientclass to implement theIManageClientinterface is a positive change that enhances the design of the codebase. By separating the interface from the class, clients can now depend on a more specific contract (IManageClient) rather than the entireManageClientclass. This adheres to the Interface Segregation Principle (ISP), which states that clients should not be forced to depend on interfaces they do not use.The change expands the capabilities of the
ManageClientclass by enforcing a new contract through theIManageClientinterface. This may introduce new methods or properties that the class must implement, potentially impacting its behavior. However, the existing functionality of the class should not be directly affected by this change.It's important to review any code that currently interacts with the
ManageClientclass to ensure compatibility with the new interface. If there are any breaking changes introduced by the interface, those will need to be addressed accordingly.Overall, this change improves the design and maintainability of the codebase by promoting a more modular and loosely coupled architecture.
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IGenerateClient.PostRemixImage.g.cs (2)
16-18: LGTM!The method signature and XML documentation are clear and descriptive. The use of asynchronous programming and cancellation tokens is a good practice. The method is part of an interface, so the implementation details are not provided, which is expected.
37-41: LGTM!The method signature and XML documentation are clear and descriptive. The use of asynchronous programming and cancellation tokens is a good practice. The method accepts the image file as a byte array and a separate filename parameter, which provides flexibility in handling image data. The method is part of an interface, so the implementation details are not provided, which is expected.
src/libs/Ideogram/Generated/Ideogram.IdeogramApi.g.cs (1)
11-11: Approve implementing theIIdeogramApiinterface.The change to implement the
IIdeogramApiinterface in theIdeogramApiclass is a good design decision. It provides the following benefits:
- Defines a contract that the
IdeogramApiclass must adhere to, promoting consistency and correctness.- Allows other classes to depend on the
IIdeogramApiinterface rather than the concreteIdeogramApiclass, promoting loose coupling and interoperability.- Improves the overall structure and design of the API by clearly defining the expected behavior through the interface.
The change does not introduce any breaking changes as the class already implements the required members.
| @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ namespace Ideogram | |||
| /// If no httpClient is provided, a new one will be created.<br/> | |||
| /// If no baseUri is provided, the default baseUri from OpenAPI spec will be used. | |||
| /// </summary> | |||
| public sealed partial class GenerateClient : global::System.IDisposable | |||
| public sealed partial class GenerateClient : global::Ideogram.IGenerateClient, global::System.IDisposable | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Breaking change: GenerateClient now implements IGenerateClient interface.
The addition of the IGenerateClient interface to the GenerateClient class is a breaking change. Any code that directly instantiates the GenerateClient class will need to be updated to use the interface instead.
This change suggests that the class now provides additional functionality or behavior as specified by the IGenerateClient interface.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
IGenerateClientandIManageClient, enhancing functionality for content generation and API management.Improvements
IdeogramApi,ManageClient, andVisionClientclasses to implement new interfaces, promoting better structure and modularity.