Fix/checkpatch #55
Merged
Fix/checkpatch #55
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
use parenthesis to make checkpatch happy Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Make checkpatch happy Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
make checkpatch happy Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Make checkpatch happy Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
bardliao
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2019
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828410 [ Upstream commit 4117992 ] KASAN does not play well with the page poisoning (CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING). It triggers false positives in the allocation path: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in memchr_inv+0x2ea/0x330 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88881f800000 by task swapper/0 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc1+ #54 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xe0/0x19a print_address_description.cold.2+0x9/0x28b kasan_report.cold.3+0x7a/0xb5 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x19/0x20 memchr_inv+0x2ea/0x330 kernel_poison_pages+0x103/0x3d5 get_page_from_freelist+0x15e7/0x4d90 because KASAN has not yet unpoisoned the shadow page for allocation before it checks memchr_inv() but only found a stale poison pattern. Also, false positives in free path, BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kernel_poison_pages+0x29e/0x3d5 Write of size 4096 at addr ffff8888112cc000 by task swapper/0/1 CPU: 5 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc1+ #55 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xe0/0x19a print_address_description.cold.2+0x9/0x28b kasan_report.cold.3+0x7a/0xb5 check_memory_region+0x22d/0x250 memset+0x28/0x40 kernel_poison_pages+0x29e/0x3d5 __free_pages_ok+0x75f/0x13e0 due to KASAN adds poisoned redzones around slab objects, but the page poisoning needs to poison the whole page. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114233405.67843-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Acked-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
bardliao
pushed a commit
to bardliao/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2020
We have a number of "uart.port->desc.lock vs desc.lock->uart.port" lockdep reports coming from 8250 driver; this causes a bit of trouble to people, so let's fix it. The problem is reverse lock order in two different call paths: chain #1: serial8250_do_startup() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); disable_irq_nosync(port->irq); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) chain #2: __report_bad_irq() raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) for_each_action_of_desc() printk() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); Fix this by changing the order of locks in serial8250_do_startup(): do disable_irq_nosync() first, which grabs desc->lock, and grab uart->port after that, so that chain #1 and chain #2 have same lock order. Full lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.4.39 thesofproject#55 Not tainted ====================================================== swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffffab65b6c0 (console_owner){-...}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d __irq_get_desc_lock+0x65/0x89 __disable_irq_nosync+0x3b/0x93 serial8250_do_startup+0x451/0x75c uart_startup+0x1b4/0x2ff uart_port_activate+0x73/0xa0 tty_port_open+0xae/0x10a uart_open+0x1b/0x26 tty_open+0x24d/0x3a0 chrdev_open+0xd5/0x1cc do_dentry_open+0x299/0x3c8 path_openat+0x434/0x1100 do_filp_open+0x9b/0x10a do_sys_open+0x15f/0x3d7 kernel_init_freeable+0x157/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d serial8250_console_write+0xa7/0x2a0 console_unlock+0x3b7/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 register_console+0x336/0x3a4 uart_add_one_port+0x51b/0x5be serial8250_register_8250_port+0x454/0x55e dw8250_probe+0x4dc/0x5b9 platform_drv_probe+0x67/0x8b really_probe+0x14a/0x422 driver_probe_device+0x66/0x130 device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b __driver_attach+0xca/0x139 bus_for_each_dev+0x97/0xc9 bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228 driver_register+0x64/0xed do_one_initcall+0x20c/0x4a6 do_initcall_level+0xb5/0xc5 do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x58 kernel_init_freeable+0x13f/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 (console_owner){-...}: __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d cpuidle_enter_state+0x12f/0x1fd cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x3d do_idle+0x1ce/0x2ce cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f start_kernel+0x406/0x46a secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &irq_desc_lock_class Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&port_lock_key); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by swapper/0/0: #0: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba #1: ffffffffab65b5c0 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning+0x20/0x181 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.39 thesofproject#55 Hardware name: XXXXXX Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0xbf/0x133 ? print_circular_bug+0xd6/0xe9 check_noncircular+0x1b9/0x1c3 __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 ? console_trylock+0x18/0x4e vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f ? lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf </IRQ> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Fixes: 768aec0 ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reported-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@google.com> BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817022646.1484638-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
cujomalainey
pushed a commit
to cujomalainey/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2020
We have a number of "uart.port->desc.lock vs desc.lock->uart.port" lockdep reports coming from 8250 driver; this causes a bit of trouble to people, so let's fix it. The problem is reverse lock order in two different call paths: chain #1: serial8250_do_startup() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); disable_irq_nosync(port->irq); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) chain #2: __report_bad_irq() raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) for_each_action_of_desc() printk() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); Fix this by changing the order of locks in serial8250_do_startup(): do disable_irq_nosync() first, which grabs desc->lock, and grab uart->port after that, so that chain #1 and chain #2 have same lock order. Full lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.4.39 thesofproject#55 Not tainted ====================================================== swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffffab65b6c0 (console_owner){-...}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d __irq_get_desc_lock+0x65/0x89 __disable_irq_nosync+0x3b/0x93 serial8250_do_startup+0x451/0x75c uart_startup+0x1b4/0x2ff uart_port_activate+0x73/0xa0 tty_port_open+0xae/0x10a uart_open+0x1b/0x26 tty_open+0x24d/0x3a0 chrdev_open+0xd5/0x1cc do_dentry_open+0x299/0x3c8 path_openat+0x434/0x1100 do_filp_open+0x9b/0x10a do_sys_open+0x15f/0x3d7 kernel_init_freeable+0x157/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d serial8250_console_write+0xa7/0x2a0 console_unlock+0x3b7/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 register_console+0x336/0x3a4 uart_add_one_port+0x51b/0x5be serial8250_register_8250_port+0x454/0x55e dw8250_probe+0x4dc/0x5b9 platform_drv_probe+0x67/0x8b really_probe+0x14a/0x422 driver_probe_device+0x66/0x130 device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b __driver_attach+0xca/0x139 bus_for_each_dev+0x97/0xc9 bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228 driver_register+0x64/0xed do_one_initcall+0x20c/0x4a6 do_initcall_level+0xb5/0xc5 do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x58 kernel_init_freeable+0x13f/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 (console_owner){-...}: __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d cpuidle_enter_state+0x12f/0x1fd cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x3d do_idle+0x1ce/0x2ce cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f start_kernel+0x406/0x46a secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &irq_desc_lock_class Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&port_lock_key); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by swapper/0/0: #0: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba #1: ffffffffab65b5c0 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning+0x20/0x181 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.39 thesofproject#55 Hardware name: XXXXXX Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0xbf/0x133 ? print_circular_bug+0xd6/0xe9 check_noncircular+0x1b9/0x1c3 __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 ? console_trylock+0x18/0x4e vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f ? lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf </IRQ> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Fixes: 768aec0 ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reported-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@google.com> BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> (am from https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1287864/) (also found at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817022646.1484638-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com) BUG=chromium:1114800 TEST=Boot on Octopus with USE="pcserial debug" enabled Change-Id: I5615162196aca3751282f61a97172c46ac7d7fba Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2354639 Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
cujomalainey
pushed a commit
to cujomalainey/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2020
commit 205d300 upstream. We have a number of "uart.port->desc.lock vs desc.lock->uart.port" lockdep reports coming from 8250 driver; this causes a bit of trouble to people, so let's fix it. The problem is reverse lock order in two different call paths: chain #1: serial8250_do_startup() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); disable_irq_nosync(port->irq); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) chain #2: __report_bad_irq() raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock) for_each_action_of_desc() printk() spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock); Fix this by changing the order of locks in serial8250_do_startup(): do disable_irq_nosync() first, which grabs desc->lock, and grab uart->port after that, so that chain #1 and chain #2 have same lock order. Full lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.4.39 thesofproject#55 Not tainted ====================================================== swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffffab65b6c0 (console_owner){-...}, at: console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d __irq_get_desc_lock+0x65/0x89 __disable_irq_nosync+0x3b/0x93 serial8250_do_startup+0x451/0x75c uart_startup+0x1b4/0x2ff uart_port_activate+0x73/0xa0 tty_port_open+0xae/0x10a uart_open+0x1b/0x26 tty_open+0x24d/0x3a0 chrdev_open+0xd5/0x1cc do_dentry_open+0x299/0x3c8 path_openat+0x434/0x1100 do_filp_open+0x9b/0x10a do_sys_open+0x15f/0x3d7 kernel_init_freeable+0x157/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x61/0x8d serial8250_console_write+0xa7/0x2a0 console_unlock+0x3b7/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 register_console+0x336/0x3a4 uart_add_one_port+0x51b/0x5be serial8250_register_8250_port+0x454/0x55e dw8250_probe+0x4dc/0x5b9 platform_drv_probe+0x67/0x8b really_probe+0x14a/0x422 driver_probe_device+0x66/0x130 device_driver_attach+0x42/0x5b __driver_attach+0xca/0x139 bus_for_each_dev+0x97/0xc9 bus_add_driver+0x12b/0x228 driver_register+0x64/0xed do_one_initcall+0x20c/0x4a6 do_initcall_level+0xb5/0xc5 do_basic_setup+0x4c/0x58 kernel_init_freeable+0x13f/0x1dd kernel_init+0xe/0x105 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 (console_owner){-...}: __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d cpuidle_enter_state+0x12f/0x1fd cpuidle_enter+0x2e/0x3d do_idle+0x1ce/0x2ce cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f start_kernel+0x406/0x46a secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &irq_desc_lock_class Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&port_lock_key); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by swapper/0/0: #0: ffff88810a8e34c0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __report_bad_irq+0x5b/0xba #1: ffffffffab65b5c0 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: console_trylock_spinning+0x20/0x181 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.39 thesofproject#55 Hardware name: XXXXXX Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0xbf/0x133 ? print_circular_bug+0xd6/0xe9 check_noncircular+0x1b9/0x1c3 __lock_acquire+0x118d/0x2714 lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_lock_spinning_enable+0x51/0x57 ? console_lock_spinning_enable+0x31/0x57 console_unlock+0x25d/0x528 ? console_trylock+0x18/0x4e vprintk_emit+0x111/0x17f ? lock_acquire+0x203/0x258 printk+0x59/0x73 __report_bad_irq+0xa3/0xba note_interrupt+0x19a/0x1d6 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x57/0x79 handle_irq_event+0x36/0x55 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc2/0x18a do_IRQ+0xb3/0x157 common_interrupt+0xf/0xf </IRQ> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Fixes: 768aec0 ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reported-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@google.com> BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817022646.1484638-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
aiChaoSONG
pushed a commit
to aiChaoSONG/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2021
Allow implementations to choose how to allocate memory for file objects.
bardliao
pushed a commit
to bardliao/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2021
Fixes a checkpatch warning: WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' thesofproject#55: FILE: drivers/reset/reset-berlin.c:55: + unsigned offset, bit; Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
plbossart
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2022
After rx/tx ring buffer size is changed, kernel panic occurs when it acts XDP_TX or XDP_REDIRECT. When tx/rx ring buffer size is changed(ethtool -G), sfc driver reallocates and reinitializes rx and tx queues and their buffer (tx_queue->buffer). But it misses reinitializing xdp queues(efx->xdp_tx_queues). So, while it is acting XDP_TX or XDP_REDIRECT, it uses the uninitialized tx_queue->buffer. A new function efx_set_xdp_channels() is separated from efx_set_channels() to handle only xdp queues. Splat looks like: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000002a #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#4] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:efx_tx_map_chunk+0x54/0x90 [sfc] CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Tainted: G D 5.17.0+ #55 e8beeee8289528f11357029357cf Code: 48 8b 8d a8 01 00 00 48 8d 14 52 4c 8d 2c d0 44 89 e0 48 85 c9 74 0e 44 89 e2 4c 89 f6 48 80 RSP: 0018:ffff92f121e45c60 EFLAGS: 00010297 RIP: 0010:efx_tx_map_chunk+0x54/0x90 [sfc] RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff92ea506895c0 RCX: ffffffffc0330870 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000001139b10ce RDI: ffff92ea506895c0 RBP: ffffffffc0358a80 R08: 00000001139b110d R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff92ea414c0088 R12: 0000000000000040 R13: 0000000000000018 R14: 00000001139b10ce R15: ffff92ea506895c0 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff92f121ec0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 Code: 48 8b 8d a8 01 00 00 48 8d 14 52 4c 8d 2c d0 44 89 e0 48 85 c9 74 0e 44 89 e2 4c 89 f6 48 80 CR2: 000000000000002a CR3: 00000003e6810004 CR4: 00000000007706e0 RSP: 0018:ffff92f121e85c60 EFLAGS: 00010297 PKRU: 55555554 RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff92ea50689700 RCX: ffffffffc0330870 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000001145a90ce RDI: ffff92ea50689700 RBP: ffffffffc0358a80 R08: 00000001145a910d R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff92ea414c0088 R12: 0000000000000040 R13: 0000000000000018 R14: 00000001145a90ce R15: ffff92ea50689700 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff92f121e80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000002a CR3: 00000003e6810005 CR4: 00000000007706e0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> efx_xdp_tx_buffers+0x12b/0x3d0 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] __efx_rx_packet+0x5c3/0x930 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] efx_rx_packet+0x28c/0x2e0 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] efx_ef10_ev_process+0x5f8/0xf40 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x95/0x550 efx_poll+0xc4/0x360 [sfc 84c94b8e32d44d296c17e10a634d3ad454de4ba5] Fixes: 3990a8f ("sfc: allocate channels for XDP tx queues") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
ujfalusi
pushed a commit
to ujfalusi/sof-linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2024
A crash was found when dumping SMC-D connections. It can be reproduced by following steps: - run nginx/wrk test: smc_run nginx smc_run wrk -t 16 -c 1000 -d <duration> -H 'Connection: Close' <URL> - continuously dump SMC-D connections in parallel: watch -n 1 'smcss -D' BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030 CPU: 2 PID: 7204 Comm: smcss Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.7.0+ thesofproject#55 RIP: 0010:__smc_diag_dump.constprop.0+0x5e5/0x620 [smc_diag] Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x24/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x66/0x150 ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x140 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? __smc_diag_dump.constprop.0+0x5e5/0x620 [smc_diag] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x35d/0x430 ? __alloc_skb+0x77/0x170 smc_diag_dump_proto+0xd0/0xf0 [smc_diag] smc_diag_dump+0x26/0x60 [smc_diag] netlink_dump+0x19f/0x320 __netlink_dump_start+0x1dc/0x300 smc_diag_handler_dump+0x6a/0x80 [smc_diag] ? __pfx_smc_diag_dump+0x10/0x10 [smc_diag] sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x121/0x140 ? __pfx_sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 netlink_rcv_skb+0x5a/0x110 sock_diag_rcv+0x28/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x22a/0x330 netlink_sendmsg+0x1f8/0x420 __sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xc0 ____sys_sendmsg+0x24e/0x300 ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x62/0x80 ___sys_sendmsg+0x7c/0xd0 ? __do_fault+0x34/0x160 ? do_read_fault+0x5f/0x100 ? do_fault+0xb0/0x110 ? __handle_mm_fault+0x2b0/0x6c0 __sys_sendmsg+0x4d/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x69/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 It is possible that the connection is in process of being established when we dump it. Assumed that the connection has been registered in a link group by smc_conn_create() but the rmb_desc has not yet been initialized by smc_buf_create(), thus causing the illegal access to conn->rmb_desc. So fix it by checking before dump. Fixes: 4b1b7d3 ("net/smc: add SMC-D diag support") Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
still a number of issues with macro parameters and spurious lines. GRRR!