Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you look at the caller, the hp_jack is set to NULL after calling this function:
so something is fishy here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@plbossart yes for sure. I guess I'm delaying something with the addition or someone is calling set_jack(NULL) twice. As I understand this will access NULL if you call it twice? Not sure of the semantics of set_jack, I guess you should be able to call it twice with NULL...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@juimonen there was a recent addition in soc-core.c to call set_jack(NULL) for robustness.
linux/sound/soc/soc-core.c
Line 935 in f95e4eb
Do you think this could be the reason?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it is, I think this fix is correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the commit that added this change: 3bb936f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ranjani yeah could be... I don't have the rt5651 device to test this, usually these devices don't reboot nicely after kernel oops, so it is really hard also with remote access device.