You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
According to https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/WireGuard#Key_generation, One can also generate a pre-shared key to add an additional layer of symmetric-key cryptography to be mixed into the already existing public-key cryptography, for post-quantum resistance. A pre-shared key should be generated for each peer pair and should not be reused.
Adding support to pre-shared key could enhance the security
Describe the solution you'd like
Create a pre-shared_key folder with permission 0700
Add command wg genpsk > client-id.psk in handlers.go and cat the psk in generating the configuration file
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ssiuhk
changed the title
Add support to have pre-shared key for each client
Add support to pre-shared key for each client
Jul 25, 2020
ssiuhk
added a commit
to ssiuhk/subspace
that referenced
this issue
Aug 26, 2020
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
According to https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/WireGuard#Key_generation, One can also generate a pre-shared key to add an additional layer of symmetric-key cryptography to be mixed into the already existing public-key cryptography, for post-quantum resistance. A pre-shared key should be generated for each peer pair and should not be reused.
Adding support to pre-shared key could enhance the security
Describe the solution you'd like
Create a pre-shared_key folder with permission 0700
Add command wg genpsk > client-id.psk in handlers.go and cat the psk in generating the configuration file
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: