[intfsorch] Fix bug for VRF existence check #882
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Skip non-existent VRF, not the opposite. Signed-off-by: shikenghua <kh_shi@edge-core.com>
prsunny
approved these changes
May 8, 2019
EdenGri
pushed a commit
to EdenGri/sonic-swss
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2022
…ic-net#882) This reverts commit 3f651dc.
oleksandrivantsiv
pushed a commit
to oleksandrivantsiv/sonic-swss
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
Add "!" to the if statement of vrf_name existence checking.
Why I did it
It should skip non-existent VRF, not the opposite.
How I verified it
Verified with local gtest.
Details if related
N/A