fix: redact bot_access_tokens from the debug logs of socket mode

[WilliamBergamin]

Summary

This PR modified the behavior of socket mode in order to redact bot_access_tokens out of the debug logs

Since the raw payload message is printed, I implemented a regex based solution, this feels less then idea for maintainability purposes, let me know if there are other better alternatives to this

Category (place an x in each of the [ ])

• slack_sdk.web.WebClient (sync/async) (Web API client)
• slack_sdk.webhook.WebhookClient (sync/async) (Incoming Webhook, response_url sender)
• slack_sdk.socket_mode (Socket Mode client)
• slack_sdk.signature (Request Signature Verifier)
• slack_sdk.oauth (OAuth Flow Utilities)
• slack_sdk.models (UI component builders)
• slack_sdk.scim (SCIM API client)
• slack_sdk.audit_logs (Audit Logs API client)
• slack_sdk.rtm_v2 (RTM client)
• /docs-src (Documents, have you run ./scripts/docs.sh?)
• /docs-src-v2 (Documents, have you run ./scripts/docs-v2.sh?)
• /tutorial (PythOnBoardingBot tutorial)
• tests/integration_tests (Automated tests for this library)

Requirements (place an x in each [ ])

• I've read and understood the Contributing Guidelines and have done my best effort to follow them.
• I've read and agree to the Code of Conduct.
• I've run python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate && ./scripts/run_validation.sh after making the changes.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.89%. Comparing base (aa3c792) to head (4edc370).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1519   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.89%   84.89%           
=======================================
  Files         112      113    +1     
  Lines       12473    12480    +7     
=======================================
+ Hits        10589    10595    +6     
- Misses       1884     1885    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[seratch]

Thanks for working on this! The change looks good to me but here is a minor suggestion on naming

[seratch]

It seems that you followed this file and method naming: https://github.com/slackapi/bolt-python/blob/main/slack_bolt/logger/messages.py The format is more of "{log_level}_{log meaning}", thus "debug_redacted_message_string" or something like that would be even better. What do you think?

Suggested change

	def debug_message_redact(message: str) -> str:
	def debug_redacted_message_string(message: str) -> str:

[WilliamBergamin]

Agreed 👍 I like debug_redacted_message_string

[seratch]

LGTM