Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Page storage #58

Open
sebsauvage opened this issue Mar 20, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

Page storage #58

sebsauvage opened this issue Mar 20, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@sebsauvage
Copy link
Owner

Add page storage feature using Respawn (or linking to a Respaw installation).

@dsferruzza
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like a good idea!
I was about to suggest adding a tool to check for dead links, but local storage of the pages might be better.

Would that be a text-only storage or do you plan to handle more complex resources like images or movies?

@sebsauvage
Copy link
Owner Author

Respawn is capable of dowloading a full web page (including images, CSS).

I guess Shaarli would, for a start, only download the following media types:

  • Web pages (using respawn lib)
  • Images (only direct links, eg. not Imgur.com albums).

Other media make things more difficult (eg. YouTube links).

@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Mar 22, 2013
@nodiscc
Copy link

nodiscc commented Apr 4, 2013

poche est un remplacant libre pour Pocket/ReadItLater (archivage local et amélioration de la lisibilité des pages). A voir avec le développeur si il est possible de faire récupérer un flux RSS de Shaarli à poche, et de sauvegarder les éléments du flux.

Il serait donc possible de lui faire récup uniquement les liens pour un certain tag (?do=rss&searchtags=alireplustard). Ou pour les liens privés, si shaarli exposait un flux de liens privés (avec authentification bien sûr). Du coup le stockage des pages serait extérieur à Shaarli (do one thing, do it well)

@nodiscc
Copy link

nodiscc commented Apr 4, 2013

Edit: démo sur http://cdetc.fr/poche/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants