Update Node.js version to v20.17.0 and fix file paths in node.yml #2113
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Node.js workflow and environment configuration. Key changes include simplification of file paths for private keys and certificates in the workflow file, alongside a downgrade of the Node.js version from Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #2113 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 29.58% 29.58%
=======================================
Files 222 222
Lines 12545 12545
Branches 455 460 +5
=======================================
Hits 3712 3712
Misses 8833 8833
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Chores** - Updated file paths for key assets in the workflow for easier access. - Downgraded Node.js version in the workflow and project configuration for improved stability and compatibility. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/node.yml (2 hunks)
- .nvmrc (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.nvmrc (1)
1-1: LGTM! Ensure all developers update their Node.js version.The Node.js version has been downgraded from
22.6.0tov20.17.0. This change aligns with the PR objective and could be due to stability or compatibility reasons.Please communicate this change to all developers and ensure they update their local environments to use Node.js
v20.17.0to avoid potential issues..github/workflows/node.yml (3)
12-12: Verify the impact of the path change and consider storing secrets in GitHub Secrets.The
CERTIFICATE_FILEpath has been simplified by removing thethebeast/prefix. Please ensure that this change does not break the workflow's access to the certificate file.As mentioned in the previous comment, it is generally recommended to store secrets in GitHub Secrets instead of the repository, even if they are considered safe to "leak". This reduces the risk of accidental exposure and makes it easier to rotate secrets when needed.
13-13: Verify the impact of the path change and consider storing secrets in GitHub Secrets.The
PUBLIC_KEY_FILEpath has been simplified by removing thethebeast/prefix. Please ensure that this change does not break the workflow's access to the public key file.As mentioned in the previous comments, it is generally recommended to store secrets in GitHub Secrets instead of the repository, even if they are considered safe to "leak". This reduces the risk of accidental exposure and makes it easier to rotate secrets when needed.
11-11: Verify the impact of the path change and consider storing secrets in GitHub Secrets.The
PRIVATE_KEY_FILEpath has been simplified by removing thethebeast/prefix. Please ensure that this change does not break the workflow's access to the private key file.Additionally, it is generally recommended to store secrets in GitHub Secrets instead of the repository, even if they are considered safe to "leak". This reduces the risk of accidental exposure and makes it easier to rotate secrets when needed.
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
|
Summary by CodeRabbit