Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci) run on all branches and manual trigger #2026

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

drazisil
Copy link
Collaborator

@drazisil drazisil commented Aug 20, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced the ability to manually trigger the CI workflow for greater control over execution.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed automatic triggers on pushes and pull requests to the main branch, streamlining the CI process.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the CI pipeline for Node.js involve modifying the GitHub Actions workflow configuration. The workflow now supports manual triggering through workflow_dispatch, while the automatic triggers for pushes and pull requests to the main branch have been removed. This adjustment allows developers to initiate the CI process on demand, promoting a more controlled workflow management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/node.yml Updated workflow triggers: added workflow_dispatch, removed automatic triggers on push and pull request to main.

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, changes were made,
With a hop and a skip, new paths now laid.
Manual triggers for workflows to cheer,
Control in our hands, the process is clear!
So let's dance with our code, make it flow,
A joyful new way for our CI to grow! 🌱✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The modifications are made within a Github Actions workflow file and it alters the trigger conditions of the workflow. However, the proposed modification may cause unintended behavior regarding the triggers on which this CI workflow gets executed.

@@ -2,9 +2,8 @@ name: Node.js CI

on:
push:
branches: [main]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The removal of this line means the workflow will no longer be triggered on push events to the 'main' branch. If this is unintended, consider reverting this change.

pull_request:
branches: [main]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The removal of this line means the workflow will no longer be triggered on creation of a pull request to the 'main' branch. If this is not intentional, consider reverting this change.

pull_request:
branches: [main]
workflow_dispatch:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This addition means the workflow can now be triggered manually via the 'Run workflow' button in the 'Actions' tab. If this is not desired, consider removing this line.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The primary change in the git diff pertains to the workflow dispatch triggers in the Github Actions workflow file. While you removed the trigger for 'push' and 'pull_request' events on the 'main' branch and added 'workflow_dispatch' as a new trigger, we need to ensure that this change would not affect the existing workflow negatively.

@@ -2,9 +2,8 @@ name: Node.js CI

on:
push:
branches: [main]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing the 'push' trigger on the 'main' branch means that the workflow won't run automatically on each push to that branch. We should only do this if running the workflow on every push is unnecessary or causing issues.

pull_request:
branches: [main]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

By removing the 'pull_request' trigger for the 'main' branch, the workflow won't run when a pull request to 'main' is created/updated which could decrease your ability to catch errors before they reach the main branch.

pull_request:
branches: [main]
workflow_dispatch:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding 'workflow_dispatch' lets you manually trigger the workflow from Github UI. This is useful if you want to run the workflow on demand or schedule it, but it does not replace the 'push' and 'pull_request' triggers. Each of these triggers should be used in different scenarios.

Copy link

@codecov codecov bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes primarily involve the modification of trigger events for the GitHub workflow for Node.js Continuous Integration (CI). Earlier it was triggered on push and pull_request events to the main branch. The updated code runs the workflow only on workflow_dispatch events. This implies manual triggering for running the CI. This hindrance in automation might not be an optimal choice for workflows like CI which should ideally be automated.

@@ -2,9 +2,8 @@ name: Node.js CI

on:
push:
branches: [main]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line signifies that workflow was previously triggered on every push to the main branch. This functionality has been removed in the new changes. If it's essential to enforce testing on each push, consider readding the removed code.

pull_request:
branches: [main]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line suggests that earlier the workflow was triggered on each pull_request made on the main branch. After the new changes, the CI will no longer trigger on pull requests. Pull requests usually entail changes that should be tested, therefore, consider reintroducing this trigger.

pull_request:
branches: [main]
workflow_dispatch:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'workflow_dispatch' event requires manual triggering of the workflow from the Actions tab in the GitHub UI. While this offers more control over when to execute the test workflow, it reduces automation. It may slow down the development process as tests need to be manually invoked and hence may be overlooked. Evaluate if this manual triggering aligns with your development workflow.

@drazisil drazisil changed the base branch from main to dev August 20, 2024 10:03
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 38.93%. Comparing base (525c7de) to head (bb3c84d).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #2026       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   24.75%   38.93%   +14.17%     
===========================================
  Files         177       88       -89     
  Lines       17117     9618     -7499     
  Branches      233      132      -101     
===========================================
- Hits         4238     3745      -493     
+ Misses      12879     5873     -7006     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
cli ?
connection ?
core 100.00% <ø> (ø)
database 61.75% <ø> (+52.23%) ⬆️
gateway 10.68% <ø> (-33.07%) ⬇️
lobby 21.30% <ø> (ø)
login 27.32% <ø> (ø)
mcots ?
nps ?
patch 87.28% <ø> (-2.63%) ⬇️
persona 38.52% <ø> (ø)
shard 41.63% <ø> (+0.63%) ⬆️
shared 13.44% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 525c7de
shared-packets ?
transactions 54.80% <ø> (ø)

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 525c7de and bb3c84d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/node.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/node.yml (1)

6-6: Consider the implications of removing automatic triggers.

By removing the automatic triggers for push and pull requests, the CI process will not run unless manually triggered. This may lead to potential oversights in testing unless developers remember to manually initiate the workflow. Ensure that your team is aware of this change and has a process in place to manually trigger the CI when necessary.

@drazisil drazisil merged commit 646aa88 into dev Aug 20, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@drazisil drazisil deleted the drazisil-patch-1 branch August 20, 2024 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant