chore(docs): add starting tutorial.md #1859
Conversation
also delete some type files commited in error
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@drazisil has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent updates involve version downgrading, transitioning to asynchronous file handling using Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1859 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 35.62% 36.72% +1.09%
==========================================
Files 127 125 -2
Lines 12063 11955 -108
Branches 175 159 -16
==========================================
+ Hits 4298 4390 +92
+ Misses 7765 7565 -200
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- STARTING.md (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/gateway/src/web.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/shard/src/index.ts (4 hunks)
- pull_nginx_image.sh (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (2)
codecov/patch failure (6)
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 117-117: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L117
Added line #L117 was not covered by tests
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 122-125: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L122-L125
Added lines #L122 - L125 were not covered by tests
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 128-128: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L128
Added line #L128 was not covered by tests
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 133-136: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L133-L136
Added lines #L133 - L136 were not covered by tests
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 139-139: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L139
Added line #L139 was not covered by tests
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 144-147: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L144-L147
Added lines #L144 - L147 were not covered by testsTrunk Check failure (4)
STARTING.md: [notice] 56-56: markdownlint(MD003)
[new] Heading style
STARTING.md: [notice] 56-56: markdownlint(MD026)
[new] Trailing punctuation in heading
STARTING.md: [failure] 1-1: prettier
Incorrect formatting, autoformat by running 'trunk fmt'
packages/shard/src/index.ts: [failure] 1-1: prettier
Incorrect formatting, autoformat by running 'trunk fmt'
Additional comments not posted (7)
pull_nginx_image.sh (1)
1-4: Consider adding error handling to the script to ensure robustness. For example, check ifwgetsuccessfully downloads the file before proceeding to unzip and load it. Additionally, verify the integrity of the downloaded file to ensure security. Lastly, ensure Docker is installed and the user has the necessary permissions to executedocker load.package.json (1)
3-3: The version of the "rusty-motors" game server project has been changed from "1.0.1" to "0.5.0". Ensure that this version change does not negatively impact any dependencies or consumers of the project. Consider the implications of this significant downgrade, which could indicate a major change in the project's direction or a correction of the versioning scheme.packages/shard/src/index.ts (1)
44-44: ThehandleGetRegistryfunction correctly generates a registry configuration file without needing asynchronous file operations.packages/gateway/src/web.ts (3)
117-125: The asynchronous operations in the/certroute handler are correctly implemented. However, consider adding test coverage for these new changes to ensure they work as expected.
128-136: Similar to the/certroute handler, the/keyroute handler's asynchronous operations are correctly implemented. Adding test coverage for these changes is recommended.
139-147: The/registryroute handler correctly implements asynchronous operations. Adding test coverage for these changes is recommended to ensure they work as expected.STARTING.md (1)
1-87: The tutorial document contains several areas for improvement:
- Correct typographical and grammatical errors, such as "Documention" should be "Documentation", and ensure consistent use of technical terms like "Node.js" instead of "NodeJS".
- Address potential security warnings explicitly, especially when instructing users to perform actions that Windows warns against.
- Consider adding links to installation documents for the listed requirements to aid users in setting up their environment.
format file delete incorrected checked in types files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/gateway/test/web.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/shard/src/index.ts (4 hunks)
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (2)
codecov/patch failure (9)
packages/shard/src/index.ts: [warning] 28-28: packages/shard/src/index.ts#L28
Added line #L28 was not covered by tests
packages/shard/src/index.ts: [warning] 33-33: packages/shard/src/index.ts#L33
Added line #L33 was not covered by tests
packages/shard/src/index.ts: [warning] 90-90: packages/shard/src/index.ts#L90
Added line #L90 was not covered by testsTrunk Check failure (4)
packages/gateway/test/web.test.ts: [failure] 22-22: eslint
[new] Parsing error: Unexpected token )
Additional comments not posted (4)
packages/gateway/test/web.test.ts (3)
20-27: The dynamic import mocking strategy is complex and might be causing parsing issues. Consider simplifying the mocking approach for better readability and maintainability. Additionally, ensure that the syntax is correct as parsing errors can lead to runtime issues.
33-38: This test case is well-implemented and checks for specific output strings, ensuring thathandleGetRegistrybehaves as expected.
40-43: The test case forhandleGetKeyis correctly implemented, ensuring the function returns the expected result.packages/shard/src/index.ts (1)
44-46: ThehandleGetRegistryfunction is correctly implemented and does not involve asynchronous operations. It generates the registry configuration string as expected.
packages/shard/src/index.ts
Outdated
| export async function handleGetCert(config: Configuration): Promise<string> { | ||
| if (config.certificateFile === undefined) { | ||
| throw new Error("Certificate file not defined"); | ||
| } | ||
| try { | ||
| const cert = readFileSync(config.certificateFile, "utf8"); | ||
| return cert; | ||
| return readFile(config.certificateFile, "utf8"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The readFile method returns a promise, which should be awaited to ensure the file is read before proceeding. Additionally, consider adding test coverage for this function to ensure its behavior is as expected.
- return readFile(config.certificateFile, "utf8");
+ return await readFile(config.certificateFile, "utf8");Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| export async function handleGetCert(config: Configuration): Promise<string> { | |
| if (config.certificateFile === undefined) { | |
| throw new Error("Certificate file not defined"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const cert = readFileSync(config.certificateFile, "utf8"); | |
| return cert; | |
| return readFile(config.certificateFile, "utf8"); | |
| export async function handleGetCert(config: Configuration): Promise<string> { | |
| if (config.certificateFile === undefined) { | |
| throw new Error("Certificate file not defined"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| return await readFile(config.certificateFile, "utf8"); |
packages/shard/src/index.ts
Outdated
| export async function handleGetKey(config: Configuration): Promise<string> { | ||
| if (config.publicKeyFile === undefined) { | ||
| throw new Error("Public key file not defined"); | ||
| } | ||
| try { | ||
| const key = readFileSync(config.publicKeyFile, "utf8"); | ||
| return key; | ||
| return readFile(config.publicKeyFile, "utf8"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to handleGetCert, the handleGetKey function should await the promise returned by readFile to ensure the file is read before proceeding. Also, consider adding test coverage for this function.
- return readFile(config.publicKeyFile, "utf8");
+ return await readFile(config.publicKeyFile, "utf8");Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| export async function handleGetKey(config: Configuration): Promise<string> { | |
| if (config.publicKeyFile === undefined) { | |
| throw new Error("Public key file not defined"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const key = readFileSync(config.publicKeyFile, "utf8"); | |
| return key; | |
| return readFile(config.publicKeyFile, "utf8"); | |
| export async function handleGetKey(config: Configuration): Promise<string> { | |
| if (config.publicKeyFile === undefined) { | |
| throw new Error("Public key file not defined"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| return await readFile(config.publicKeyFile, "utf8"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (1)
- package.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
Additional Context Used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (3)
- packages/gateway/src/web.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/gateway/test/web.test.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/shard/src/index.ts (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/gateway/test/web.test.ts
- packages/shard/src/index.ts
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
codecov/patch failure (5)
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 117-117: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L117
Added line #L117 was not covered by tests
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 122-125: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L122-L125
Added lines #L122 - L125 were not covered by tests
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 128-128: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L128
Added line #L128 was not covered by tests
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 133-136: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L133-L136
Added lines #L133 - L136 were not covered by tests
packages/gateway/src/web.ts: [warning] 145-147: packages/gateway/src/web.ts#L145-L147
Added lines #L145 - L147 were not covered by tests
| webServer.get("/cert", async (_request, reply) => { | ||
| const config = getServerConfiguration({}); | ||
| if (typeof config.host === "undefined") { | ||
| throw new Error("No host defined in config"); | ||
| } | ||
| return reply.send(handleGetCert(config)); | ||
| const certFile = await handleGetCert(config); | ||
| reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain"); | ||
| reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=cert.crt"); | ||
| reply.send(certFile); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The async implementation for the /cert route handler is well done. However, consider adding error handling for the handleGetCert function to manage potential failures gracefully. Additionally, it's important to ensure this new code path is covered by tests to maintain code quality and reliability.
webServer.get("/cert", async (_request, reply) => {
const config = getServerConfiguration({});
if (typeof config.host === "undefined") {
throw new Error("No host defined in config");
}
+ try {
const certFile = await handleGetCert(config);
reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain");
reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=cert.crt");
reply.send(certFile);
+ } catch (error) {
+ reply.status(500).send('Internal Server Error');
+ }
});Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for this route handler?
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| webServer.get("/cert", async (_request, reply) => { | |
| const config = getServerConfiguration({}); | |
| if (typeof config.host === "undefined") { | |
| throw new Error("No host defined in config"); | |
| } | |
| return reply.send(handleGetCert(config)); | |
| const certFile = await handleGetCert(config); | |
| reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain"); | |
| reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=cert.crt"); | |
| reply.send(certFile); | |
| webServer.get("/cert", async (_request, reply) => { | |
| const config = getServerConfiguration({}); | |
| if (typeof config.host === "undefined") { | |
| throw new Error("No host defined in config"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const certFile = await handleGetCert(config); | |
| reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain"); | |
| reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=cert.crt"); | |
| reply.send(certFile); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| reply.status(500).send('Internal Server Error'); | |
| } |
| webServer.get("/key", async (_request, reply) => { | ||
| const config = getServerConfiguration({}); | ||
| if (typeof config.host === "undefined") { | ||
| throw new Error("No host defined in config"); | ||
| } | ||
| return reply.send(handleGetKey(config)); | ||
| const keyFile = await handleGetKey(config); | ||
| reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain"); | ||
| reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=pub.key"); | ||
| reply.send(keyFile); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the /cert handler, the /key route handler's async implementation is good. However, adding error handling for the handleGetKey function would improve robustness. Ensuring test coverage for this part of the code is also crucial.
webServer.get("/key", async (_request, reply) => {
const config = getServerConfiguration({});
if (typeof config.host === "undefined") {
throw new Error("No host defined in config");
}
+ try {
const keyFile = await handleGetKey(config);
reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain");
reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=pub.key");
reply.send(keyFile);
+ } catch (error) {
+ reply.status(500).send('Internal Server Error');
+ }
});Would you like help in creating unit tests for this route handler?
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| webServer.get("/key", async (_request, reply) => { | |
| const config = getServerConfiguration({}); | |
| if (typeof config.host === "undefined") { | |
| throw new Error("No host defined in config"); | |
| } | |
| return reply.send(handleGetKey(config)); | |
| const keyFile = await handleGetKey(config); | |
| reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain"); | |
| reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=pub.key"); | |
| reply.send(keyFile); | |
| webServer.get("/key", async (_request, reply) => { | |
| const config = getServerConfiguration({}); | |
| if (typeof config.host === "undefined") { | |
| throw new Error("No host defined in config"); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const keyFile = await handleGetKey(config); | |
| reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain"); | |
| reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=pub.key"); | |
| reply.send(keyFile); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| reply.status(500).send('Internal Server Error'); | |
| } | |
| }); |
| const regFile = handleGetRegistry(config); | ||
| reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain"); | ||
| reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=client.reg"); | ||
| reply.send(regFile); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The /registry route handler is not async, unlike the /cert and /key handlers. For consistency and to leverage async file handling, consider updating this handler to be async as well. Also, ensure this part of the code is covered by tests.
webServer.get("/registry", (_request, reply) => {
const config = getServerConfiguration({});
if (typeof config.host === "undefined") {
throw new Error("No host defined in config");
}
+ try {
- const regFile = handleGetRegistry(config);
+ const regFile = await handleGetRegistry(config);
reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain");
reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=client.reg");
reply.send(regFile);
+ } catch (error) {
+ reply.status(500).send('Internal Server Error');
+ }
});Would you like help in creating unit tests for this route handler?
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| const regFile = handleGetRegistry(config); | |
| reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain"); | |
| reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=client.reg"); | |
| reply.send(regFile); | |
| try { | |
| const regFile = await handleGetRegistry(config); | |
| reply.header("Content-Type", "text/plain"); | |
| reply.header("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=client.reg"); | |
| reply.send(regFile); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| reply.status(500).send('Internal Server Error'); | |
| } |
chore(docs): add starting tutorial.md
Summary by CodeRabbit