Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add fractional second support to str{p,f}time #9016

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sfackler
Copy link
Member

@sfackler sfackler commented Sep 6, 2013

The ISO 8601 standard does not mandate any specific precision for
fractional seconds, so this accepts input of any length, ignoring the
part after the nanoseconds place. It may be more correct to round with
the tenths of nanoseconds digit, but then we'd have to deal with
carrying the round through the entire Tm struct (e.g. for a time like
Dec 31 11:59.999999999999).

%f is the format specifier that Python's datetime library uses for
0-padded microseconds so it seemed appropriate here.

cc #2350

The ISO 8601 standard does not mandate any specific precision for
fractional seconds, so this accepts input of any length, ignoring the
part after the nanoseconds place. It may be more correct to round with
the tenths of nanoseconds digit, but then we'd have to deal with
carrying the round through the entire Tm struct (e.g. for a time like
Dec 31 11:59.999999999999).

%f is the format specifier that Python's datetime library uses for
0-padded microseconds so it seemed appropriate here.

cc rust-lang#2350
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2013
The ISO 8601 standard does not mandate any specific precision for
fractional seconds, so this accepts input of any length, ignoring the
part after the nanoseconds place. It may be more correct to round with
the tenths of nanoseconds digit, but then we'd have to deal with
carrying the round through the entire Tm struct (e.g. for a time like
Dec 31 11:59.999999999999).

%f is the format specifier that Python's datetime library uses for
0-padded microseconds so it seemed appropriate here.

cc #2350
@bors bors closed this Sep 7, 2013
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2022
…ffate

Use `RefCell` in `needless_return` tests

changelog: none

The stdio locks no longer fail to compile if the `return` is removed due to them now being `'static` (rust-lang#9008)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants