Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

_match.rs: prune sub-match tree too aggressively #13034

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2014
Merged

Conversation

edwardw
Copy link
Contributor

@edwardw edwardw commented Mar 20, 2014

The _match.rs takes advantage of passes prior to trans and
aggressively prunes the sub-match tree based on exact equality. When it
comes to literal or range, the strategy may lead to wrong result if
there's guard function or multiple patterns inside tuple.

Closes #12582.
Closes #13027.

@emberian
Copy link
Member

r? @nikomatsakis

let m2 = const_eval::compare_lit_exprs(tcx, a2, b_expr);
match (m1, m2) {
// b is in range [a1, a2] iff a1 <= b and b <= a2
(Some(val1), Some(val2)) => (val1 <= 0 && 0 <= val2),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

0?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, does compare_lit_exprs return -1, 0 or 1? How peculiar.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it does that like Java did :)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we have an Ordering enum just for this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, val1 <= Equal && Equal <= val2 that'll be more readable.

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

After reading into the code, I don't think this is the right answer. I wrote details (a lot more details) here: #13027 (comment)

@edwardw edwardw changed the title With overlapped arms a single value never matches against range _match.rs: prune sub-match tree too aggressively Mar 22, 2014
@edwardw edwardw closed this Mar 22, 2014
@edwardw edwardw reopened this Mar 22, 2014
@edwardw
Copy link
Contributor Author

edwardw commented Mar 22, 2014

r?

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

(r+ with a comment, in case that was unclear)

The `_match.rs` takes advantage of passes prior to `trans` and
aggressively prunes the sub-match tree based on exact equality. When it
comes to literal or range, the strategy may lead to wrong result if
there's guard function or multiple patterns inside tuple.

Closes rust-lang#12582.
Closes rust-lang#13027.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2014
The `_match.rs` takes advantage of passes prior to `trans` and
aggressively prunes the sub-match tree based on exact equality. When it
comes to literal or range, the strategy may lead to wrong result if
there's guard function or multiple patterns inside tuple.

Closes #12582.
Closes #13027.
@bors bors closed this Mar 27, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 4112941 into rust-lang:master Mar 27, 2014
@edwardw edwardw deleted the match branch March 27, 2014 12:29
edwardw added a commit to edwardw/rust that referenced this pull request May 5, 2014
It has been found that rust-lang#13034 was flawed and caused regression rust-lang#13867.
This patch reveres the changes made by it except the companion tests.
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2022
fix: escape keywords used as names in earlier editions

Fixes rust-lang#13030

There are keywords in Rust 2018+ that you can use as names without escaping when your crate is in Rust 2015 e.g. "try". We need to be consistent on how to keep track of the names regardless of how they are actually written in each crate. This patch attempts at it by taking such names into account and storing them uniformly in their escaped form.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2023
…, r=Veykril

fix: Search raw identifiers without prefix

When we find references/usages of a raw identifier, we should disregard `r#` prefix because there are keywords one can use without the prefix in earlier editions (see rust-lang#13034; this bug is actually fallout from the PR). `name`, the text we're searching for, has already been stripped of the prefix, but the text of nodes we compare it to hasn't been.

The second commit is strictly refactoring, I can remove it if it's not much of value.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
6 participants