Port run-make/sysroot-crates-are-unstable to rmake
#129071
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
A-run-make
|
This PR modifies cc @jieyouxu |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2024
Port `run-make/sysroot-crates-are-unstable` to rmake I already have a more elaborate draft at rust-lang#126231 that tries to port the underlying Python script to rmake, but there's no need for the removal of Makefiles to be held up on complex tasks like that, so this PR simply takes the trivial Makefile and converts it into a trivial rmake recipe. Part of rust-lang#121876. r? `@jieyouxu`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128828 (`-Znext-solver` caching) - rust-lang#128954 (Explicitly specify type parameter on FromResidual for Option and ControlFlow.) - rust-lang#129054 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`) - rust-lang#129059 (Record the correct target type when coercing fn items/closures to pointers) - rust-lang#129071 (Port `run-make/sysroot-crates-are-unstable` to rmake) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2024
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128570 (Stabilize `asm_const`) - rust-lang#128828 (`-Znext-solver` caching) - rust-lang#128954 (Explicitly specify type parameter on FromResidual for Option and ControlFlow.) - rust-lang#129059 (Record the correct target type when coercing fn items/closures to pointers) - rust-lang#129071 (Port `run-make/sysroot-crates-are-unstable` to rmake) - rust-lang#129088 (Make the rendered html doc for rustc better) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129071 - Zalathar:sysroot-unstable, r=jieyouxu Port `run-make/sysroot-crates-are-unstable` to rmake I already have a more elaborate draft at rust-lang#126231 that tries to port the underlying Python script to rmake, but there's no need for the removal of Makefiles to be held up on complex tasks like that, so this PR simply takes the trivial Makefile and converts it into a trivial rmake recipe. Part of rust-lang#121876. r? ``@jieyouxu``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2024
Port the `sysroot-crates-are-unstable` Python script to rmake New version of rust-lang#126231, and a follow-up to rust-lang#129071. One major difference is that the new version no longer tries to report *all* accidentally-stable crates, because the `run_make_support` helpers tend to halt the test as soon as something goes wrong. That's unfortunate, but I think it won't matter much in practice, and preserving the old behaviour doesn't seem worth the extra effort. --- Part of rust-lang#110479 (Python purge), with this being one of the non-trivial Python scripts that actually seems feasible and worthwhile to remove. This is *not* part of rust-lang#121876 (Makefile purge), because the underlying test is already using rmake; this PR just modifies the existing rmake recipe to do all the work itself instead of delegating to Python. So there's no particular urgency here. r? `@jieyouxu` try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2024
Port the `sysroot-crates-are-unstable` Python script to rmake New version of rust-lang#126231, and a follow-up to rust-lang#129071. One major difference is that the new version no longer tries to report *all* accidentally-stable crates, because the `run_make_support` helpers tend to halt the test as soon as something goes wrong. That's unfortunate, but I think it won't matter much in practice, and preserving the old behaviour doesn't seem worth the extra effort. --- Part of rust-lang#110479 (Python purge), with this being one of the non-trivial Python scripts that actually seems feasible and worthwhile to remove. This is *not* part of rust-lang#121876 (Makefile purge), because the underlying test is already using rmake; this PR just modifies the existing rmake recipe to do all the work itself instead of delegating to Python. So there's no particular urgency here. r? `@jieyouxu` try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
Port the `sysroot-crates-are-unstable` Python script to rmake New version of rust-lang#126231, and a follow-up to rust-lang#129071. One major difference is that the new version no longer tries to report *all* accidentally-stable crates, because the `run_make_support` helpers tend to halt the test as soon as something goes wrong. That's unfortunate, but I think it won't matter much in practice, and preserving the old behaviour doesn't seem worth the extra effort. --- Part of rust-lang#110479 (Python purge), with this being one of the non-trivial Python scripts that actually seems feasible and worthwhile to remove. This is *not* part of rust-lang#121876 (Makefile purge), because the underlying test is already using rmake; this PR just modifies the existing rmake recipe to do all the work itself instead of delegating to Python. So there's no particular urgency here. r? `@jieyouxu` try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
Port the `sysroot-crates-are-unstable` Python script to rmake New version of rust-lang#126231, and a follow-up to rust-lang#129071. One major difference is that the new version no longer tries to report *all* accidentally-stable crates, because the `run_make_support` helpers tend to halt the test as soon as something goes wrong. That's unfortunate, but I think it won't matter much in practice, and preserving the old behaviour doesn't seem worth the extra effort. --- Part of rust-lang#110479 (Python purge), with this being one of the non-trivial Python scripts that actually seems feasible and worthwhile to remove. This is *not* part of rust-lang#121876 (Makefile purge), because the underlying test is already using rmake; this PR just modifies the existing rmake recipe to do all the work itself instead of delegating to Python. So there's no particular urgency here. r? ``@jieyouxu`` try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
Port the `sysroot-crates-are-unstable` Python script to rmake New version of rust-lang#126231, and a follow-up to rust-lang#129071. One major difference is that the new version no longer tries to report *all* accidentally-stable crates, because the `run_make_support` helpers tend to halt the test as soon as something goes wrong. That's unfortunate, but I think it won't matter much in practice, and preserving the old behaviour doesn't seem worth the extra effort. --- Part of rust-lang#110479 (Python purge), with this being one of the non-trivial Python scripts that actually seems feasible and worthwhile to remove. This is *not* part of rust-lang#121876 (Makefile purge), because the underlying test is already using rmake; this PR just modifies the existing rmake recipe to do all the work itself instead of delegating to Python. So there's no particular urgency here. r? ```@jieyouxu``` try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
Port the `sysroot-crates-are-unstable` Python script to rmake New version of rust-lang#126231, and a follow-up to rust-lang#129071. One major difference is that the new version no longer tries to report *all* accidentally-stable crates, because the `run_make_support` helpers tend to halt the test as soon as something goes wrong. That's unfortunate, but I think it won't matter much in practice, and preserving the old behaviour doesn't seem worth the extra effort. --- Part of rust-lang#110479 (Python purge), with this being one of the non-trivial Python scripts that actually seems feasible and worthwhile to remove. This is *not* part of rust-lang#121876 (Makefile purge), because the underlying test is already using rmake; this PR just modifies the existing rmake recipe to do all the work itself instead of delegating to Python. So there's no particular urgency here. r? ````@jieyouxu```` try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129111 - Zalathar:python-sysroot, r=jieyouxu Port the `sysroot-crates-are-unstable` Python script to rmake New version of rust-lang#126231, and a follow-up to rust-lang#129071. One major difference is that the new version no longer tries to report *all* accidentally-stable crates, because the `run_make_support` helpers tend to halt the test as soon as something goes wrong. That's unfortunate, but I think it won't matter much in practice, and preserving the old behaviour doesn't seem worth the extra effort. --- Part of rust-lang#110479 (Python purge), with this being one of the non-trivial Python scripts that actually seems feasible and worthwhile to remove. This is *not* part of rust-lang#121876 (Makefile purge), because the underlying test is already using rmake; this PR just modifies the existing rmake recipe to do all the work itself instead of delegating to Python. So there's no particular urgency here. r? ````@jieyouxu```` try-job: aarch64-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I already have a more elaborate draft at #126231 that tries to port the underlying Python script to rmake, but there's no need for the removal of Makefiles to be held up on complex tasks like that, so this PR simply takes the trivial Makefile and converts it into a trivial rmake recipe.
Part of #121876.
r? @jieyouxu