Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set the in-rust-tree feature for all rust-analyzer{-proc-macro-srv} steps #118861

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

Veykril
Copy link
Member

@Veykril Veykril commented Dec 12, 2023

Some context: This came up in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/libraryfying.20match.20checking.3F where test and check behaved differently for rust-analyzer
r? @onur-ozkan

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Dec 12, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 12, 2023

rust-analyzer is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rust-analyzer instead.

cc @rust-lang/rust-analyzer

&["rust-analyzer/in-rust-tree".to_owned()],
&["in-rust-tree".to_owned()],
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed these prefixed ones given we didn't prefix the sysroot-abi feature either in the other places, and I was kind of confused that these worked in the first place

Copy link
Member

@onur-ozkan onur-ozkan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess you missed this part

extra_features: vec!["rust-analyzer/in-rust-tree".to_owned()],

@onur-ozkan onur-ozkan added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 12, 2023
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

I tested and it fixes my original problem, thanks!

@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Dec 13, 2023

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 13, 2023
@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 13, 2023

📌 Commit e623cc1 has been approved by onur-ozkan

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 13, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 13, 2023

⌛ Testing commit e623cc1 with merge c365c95...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
Set the `in-rust-tree` feature for all rust-analyzer{-proc-macro-srv} steps

Some context: This came up in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/libraryfying.20match.20checking.3F where `test` and `check` behaved differently for rust-analyzer
r? `@onur-ozkan`
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 13, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 13, 2023
@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Dec 15, 2023

I don't understand the issue here 😕

@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

bjorn3 commented Dec 15, 2023

rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv is marked as ToolStd and thus assumed to not depend on the compiler libraries. Try changing it to ToolRustc.

@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 15, 2023

📌 Commit 8aa9c48 has been approved by onur-ozkan

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented Jan 4, 2024

Made a mistake when resolving a conflict while rebasing earlier

@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 4, 2024

📌 Commit abf0822 has been approved by onur-ozkan

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jan 4, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 4, 2024

⌛ Testing commit abf0822 with merge 12f1474...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2024
Set the `in-rust-tree` feature for all rust-analyzer{-proc-macro-srv} steps

Some context: This came up in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/libraryfying.20match.20checking.3F where `test` and `check` behaved differently for rust-analyzer
r? `@onur-ozkan`
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job aarch64-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
   Compiling rustc_builtin_macros v0.0.0 (/checkout/compiler/rustc_builtin_macros)
[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_ast_passes test:false 7.142
[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_expand test:false 19.825
[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_builtin_macros test:false 19.461
##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.
##[group]Clock drift check
  local time: Fri Jan  5 00:02:08 UTC 2024
  network time: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 00:02:08 GMT
##[endgroup]
##[endgroup]
Session terminated, killing shell... ...killed.
##[error]The operation was canceled.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 5, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 5, 2024
@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented Jan 5, 2024

@bors retry runner quit

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 5, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 5, 2024

⌛ Testing commit abf0822 with merge a59a980...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 5, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: onur-ozkan
Pushing a59a980 to master...

1 similar comment
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 5, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: onur-ozkan
Pushing a59a980 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 5, 2024
@bors bors merged commit a59a980 into rust-lang:master Jan 5, 2024
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 5, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a59a980): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.5% [5.5%, 5.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.5% [-4.5%, -4.5%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 669.247s -> 670.544s (0.19%)
Artifact size: 311.06 MiB -> 311.06 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.