Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #105248

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 4, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #105248

merged 9 commits into from
Dec 4, 2022

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

luqmana and others added 9 commits November 24, 2022 21:15
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
…stion, r=compiler-errors

Don't suggest associated function call for associated const.

Fixes rust-lang#104801.

r? `@compiler-errors`
…oyment, r=oli-obk

Fix passing MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET to the linker

I messed up in rust-lang#103929 when merging the two base files together and as a result, started ignoring `MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET` at the linker level. This ended up being the cause of nighty builds not running on older macOS versions.

My original hope with the previous PR was that CI would have caught something like that but there were only tests checking the compiler target definitions in codegen tests. Because of how badly this sucks to break, I put together a new test via `run-make` that actually confirms the deployment target set makes it to the linker instead of just LLVM.

Closes rust-lang#104570 (for real this time)
Make inline const block `ExprWithBlock`

Fix rust-lang#104087 (comment)

`@rustbot` label: +T-lang +F-inline_const
Add regression test for rust-lang#79450

Closes rust-lang#79450
r? `@oli-obk`

Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 4, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 4, 2022

📌 Commit da9585b has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 4, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 4, 2022

⌛ Testing commit da9585b with merge 344889e...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 4, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 344889e to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 4, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 344889e into rust-lang:master Dec 4, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Dec 4, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#105237 3e97354b77284dd2508d4098c7bf6daaad6244a0
#105142 7df43cddec61007a5438fccb3e06c1771d9c652c
#105123 23b036f88182ed133b020bf79bfe7a289e353459
#104856 2eb6e9d14786d00e8a6970493132e9bf8d5a3cd9

previous master: 9e772114e6

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (344889e): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.5% [2.5%, 2.5%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.5% [2.5%, 2.5%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-d56k6bc branch December 22, 2022 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants