Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 10 pull requests #104270

Closed
wants to merge 33 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

alexcrichton and others added 30 commits September 23, 2022 17:06
This implements the `Linker::{link_whole_staticlib,link_whole_rlib}`
methods for the `WasmLd` linker used on wasm targets. Previously these
methods were noops since I think historically `wasm-ld` did not have
support for `--whole-archive` but nowadays it does, so the flags are
passed through.
This checks the number of references for the given and expected type and
shows hints to the user if the numbers don't match.
Corresponding subsection in async book is not `07.05` not `07.06`.

The information on the linked page is the same so it may be reasonable to remove the whole sentence.
This allows retrying binding TCP Socket multiple times. This is useful
when using emulators as network might not be available in the beginning.
This was orignally implemented in rust-lang#100316

Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
Do not point at whole statement, only at the expression (skip pointing at `;`)
… `Future::Output`

No longer lint against `#[must_use] async fn foo()`.

When encountering a statement that awaits on a `Future`, check if the
`Future`'s parent item is annotated with `#[must_use]` and emit a lint
if so. This effectively makes `must_use` an annotation on the
`Future::Output` instead of only the `Future` itself.

Fix rust-lang#78149.
… r=tmandry

Consider `#[must_use]` annotation on `async fn` as also affecting the `Future::Output`

No longer lint against `#[must_use] async fn foo()`.

When encountering a statement that awaits on a `Future`, check if the
`Future`'s parent item is annotated with `#[must_use]` and emit a lint
if so. This effectively makes `must_use` an annotation on the
`Future::Output` instead of only the `Future` itself.

Fix rust-lang#78149.
…ve, r=estebank

Implement the `+whole-archive` modifier for `wasm-ld`

This implements the `Linker::{link_whole_staticlib,link_whole_rlib}` methods for the `WasmLd` linker used on wasm targets. Previously these methods were noops since I think historically `wasm-ld` did not have support for `--whole-archive` but nowadays it does, so the flags are passed through.
…stic_when_passing_arg_to_closure_and_missing_borrow, r=estebank

Simpler diagnostic when passing arg to closure and missing borrow

fixes rust-lang#64915

I followed roughly the instructions and the older PR rust-lang#76362.
The number of references for the expected and the found types will be compared and depending on which has more the diagnostic will be emitted.

I'm not quite sure if my approach with the many `span_bug!`s is good, it could lead to some ICEs. Would it be better if  those errors are ignored?

As far as I know the following code works similarly but in a different context. Is this probably reusable since it looks like it would emit better diagnostics?
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a688a0305fad9219505a8f2576446510601bafe8/compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/demand.rs#L713-L1061

When running the tests locally, a codegen test failed. Is there something I can/ should do about that?

If you have some improvements/ corrections please say so and I will happily include them.

r? `@estebank` (as you added the mentoring instructions to the issue)
`#[test]`: Point at return type if `Termination` bound is unsatisfied

Together with rust-lang#103142 (already merged) this fully fixes rust-lang#50291.

I don't consider my current solution of changing a few spans “here and there” very clean since the
failed obligation is a `FunctionArgumentObligation` and we point at a type instead of a function argument.

If you agree with me on this point, I can offer to keep the spans of the existing nodes and instead inject
`let _: AssertRetTyIsTermination<$ret_ty>;` (type to be defined in `libtest`) similar to `AssertParamIsEq` etc.
used by some built-in derive-macros.

I haven't tried that approach yet though and cannot promise that it would actually work out or
be “cleaner” for that matter.

`@rustbot` label A-libtest A-diagnostics
r? `@estebank`
…-parentheses, r=estebank

Fix unused lint and parser caring about spaces to won't produce invalid code

Fixes rust-lang#103435
…tebank

Suggest calling the instance method of the same name when method not found

Fixes rust-lang#103474
Fix broken link in description of error code E0706

Corresponding subsection in async book is `07.05` not `07.06`.

The information on the linked page is the same so it may be reasonable to remove the whole sentence.
prevent uninitialized access in black_box for zero-sized-types

Don't read the pointer location in black_box for zero sized types, just emit a memory clobber instead. Addresses  rust-lang#103304 when rust is build against LLVM at HEAD.

Zulip thread: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187780-t-compiler.2Fwg-llvm/topic/.28with.20llvm.20at.20HEAD.29.3A.20msan.20error.20in.20core.3A.3Ahint.3A.3Ablack_box
…n514

Retry binding TCP Socket in remote-test-server

This allows retrying binding TCP Socket multiple times. This is useful when using emulators as network might not be available in the beginning.

This was orignally implemented in rust-lang#100316

Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Nov 11, 2022
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=5 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 11, 2022

📌 Commit fe41af6 has been approved by Manishearth

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 11, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 11, 2022

⌛ Testing commit fe41af6 with merge 46f52e6ed7f832cc8197a7baf1a4e9dde54b8e33...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 11, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 11, 2022
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

tidy error: /checkout/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/suggestions.rs: too many lines (3034) (add `// ignore-tidy-filelength` to the file to suppress this error)

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job mingw-check failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
configure: rust.debug-assertions := True
configure: rust.overflow-checks := True
configure: llvm.assertions      := True
configure: dist.missing-tools   := True
configure: build.configure-args := ['--enable-sccache', '--disable-manage-submodu ...
configure: writing `config.toml` in current directory
configure: 
configure: run `python /checkout/x.py --help`
Attempting with retry: make prepare
---
* highest error code: E0790
Found 506 error codes
Found 0 error(s) in error codes
Done!
tidy error: /checkout/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/suggestions.rs: too many lines (3034) (add `// ignore-tidy-filelength` to the file to suppress this error)
some tidy checks failed
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:00:13

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
* highest error code: E0790
Found 506 error codes
Found 0 error(s) in error codes
Done!
tidy error: /checkout/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/suggestions.rs: too many lines (3034) (add `// ignore-tidy-filelength` to the file to suppress this error)
some tidy checks failed
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:00:20

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.