Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate no result page link color to CSS variables #104250

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 12, 2022

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 10, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 10, 2022

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez, @Folyd, @jsha

A change occurred in the Ayu theme.

cc @Cldfire

@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
--sidebar-current-link-background-color: #444;
--search-result-link-focus-background-color: #616161;
--search-result-border-color: #aaa3;
--search-failed-link-color: #0089ff;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that, in this dark theme, the search failed link color is different from the ordinary link color, but in other themes, it's the same.

Is there a reason why they can't be the same color? It seems perfectly readable that way.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice. Then it makes this migration even simpler. I'll remove this variable and simply use the default color instead.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Done! Thanks again for the idea @notriddle !

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 11, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #104289) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed merge conflict.

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 12, 2022

📌 Commit ee73812 has been approved by notriddle

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 12, 2022
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2022
…ink-color, r=notriddle

Migrate no result page link color to CSS variables

r? `@notriddle`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2022
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104110 (prevent uninitialized access in black_box for zero-sized-types)
 - rust-lang#104117 (Mark `trait_upcasting` feature no longer incomplete.)
 - rust-lang#104144 (Suggest removing unnecessary `.` to use a floating point literal)
 - rust-lang#104250 (Migrate no result page link color to CSS variables)
 - rust-lang#104261 (More accurately report error when formal and expected signature types differ)
 - rust-lang#104263 (Add a reference to ilog2 in leading_zeros integer docs)
 - rust-lang#104308 (Remove the old `ValidAlign` name)
 - rust-lang#104319 (Fix non clickable source link)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 6601e20 into rust-lang:master Nov 12, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 12, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the migrate-not-found-link-color branch November 12, 2022 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants