Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Messages in threads with no parent count as separate threads in mailbox list limit #4999

Closed
rcubetrac opened this issue Mar 25, 2010 · 4 comments

Comments

@rcubetrac
Copy link

Reported by trisk on 25 Mar 2010 20:09 UTC as Trac ticket #1486581

Some threads can have many messages referring to a parent which is not present (an example is the emails from this Trac instance, if I am CC'ed on a ticket I did not create). These threads cannot be expanded/unexpanded, as discussed in #1486571 and RFC 5256 says they should have a dummy message as their parent. The messages still count as separate threads or rows towards the mailbox list limit (default 40) while threads with a single parent only count the parent. This is a problem if the thread is particularly long as it can take up more than the thread limit and keep all other messages on previous pages.

Counting them as a single thread for the purposes of the mailbox list is a possible solution, but that could make the mailbox view a display lot more rows than is reasonable.

Migrated-From: http://trac.roundcube.net/ticket/1486581

@rcubetrac
Copy link
Author

Comment by trisk on 15 Apr 2010 18:56 UTC

As a solution, I propose that parent-less threads should still allow (un)expansion using a dummy parent message, displaying the most recent message when not expanded. I'll investigate the implementation when I have time.

@rcubetrac
Copy link
Author

Milestone changed by @alecpl on 15 May 2012 10:25 UTC

0.8-rc => 0.9-beta

@rcubetrac
Copy link
Author

Milestone changed by @alecpl on 17 Sep 2012 11:00 UTC

0.9-beta => later

@alecpl
Copy link
Member

alecpl commented Jan 6, 2020

Fixed.

@alecpl alecpl closed this as completed Jan 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants