better enum support + fix for enum34 IntEnum quirk #121
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ezarowny
force-pushed
the
better-enum-support
branch
from
0f5644f
to
89bbb94
Compare
| # backport enum34 which causes it to not have the same | ||
| # behavior as Python 3.4+. One way to identify IntEnums is that | ||
| # they are instances of numbers but not number types. | ||
| if isinstance(o, integer_types + (float,)): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's probably worth creating a global number_types so we aren't constantly creating new tuples.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah that's probably true - not a bad idea at all
|
👍 |
|
cc @dlsteuer |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See https://bitbucket.org/stoneleaf/enum34/issues/17/difference-between-enum34-and-enum-json for enum34 quirk