Cryoscope

[andrea-pasquale]

I'm currently using this protocol to calibrate the filters of QM.
It is not precisely a cryoscope but I'm just fitting with an exponential the time of rise and then I apply the corresponding FIR and IIR filters.

• Improve documentation
• Move post-processing in fit

Checklist:

• Reviewers confirm new code works as expected.
• Tests are passing.
• Coverage does not decrease.
• Documentation is updated.
• Compatibility with Qibo modules (Please edit this section if the current pull request is not compatible with the following branches).
  • Qibo: master
  • Qibolab: main
  • Qibolab_platforms_qrc: main

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.16393% with 73 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.77%. Comparing base (c4fdce8) to head (dc99101).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...bocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/cryoscope.py	36.52%	73 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #974      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.50%   96.77%   -0.74%     
==========================================
  Files         123      124       +1     
  Lines        9701     9820     +119     
==========================================
+ Hits         9459     9503      +44     
- Misses        242      317      +75     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	96.77% <40.16%> (-0.74%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/qibocal/protocols/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ibocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ibocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/optimize.py	97.75% <ø> (ø)
...rotocols/two_qubit_interaction/virtual_z_phases.py	95.67% <100.00%> (+0.08%)	⬆️
...bocal/protocols/two_qubit_interaction/cryoscope.py	36.52% <36.52%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes