Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport maintenance/2.16.x] Fix FP for used-before-assignment with assignment expressions in containers #8262

Merged

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport a0b28f9 from #8253.

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 2.16.2 milestone Feb 11, 2023
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added the Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow label Feb 11, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #8262 (2fc0a4e) into maintenance/2.16.x (4aedc4f) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/2.16.x    #8262   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage               95.53%   95.53%           
===================================================
  Files                     177      177           
  Lines                   18647    18650    +3     
===================================================
+ Hits                    17815    17818    +3     
  Misses                    832      832           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pylint/checkers/variables.py 97.30% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit c2cd7c6 into maintenance/2.16.x Feb 11, 2023
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas deleted the backport-8253-to-maintenance/2.16.x branch February 11, 2023 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining pylint or the dev workflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants