Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/test after fix fab compatibility #316

Conversation

joaopamaral
Copy link


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

jscheffl and others added 5 commits August 27, 2024 15:11
Bumps [micromatch](https://github.com/micromatch/micromatch) from 4.0.5 to 4.0.8.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/micromatch/micromatch/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/micromatch/micromatch/blob/4.0.8/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](micromatch/micromatch@4.0.5...4.0.8)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: micromatch
  dependency-type: indirect
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
(cherry picked from commit e02052b)

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ache#41791)

* chore(docs): add an example for auth with keycloak

Added a new section in the authentication documentation that provides a code of configuring Airflow to work with Keycloak.

* chore(docs): add an example for auth with keycloak

Fix spelling and styling

* chore(docs): add an example for auth with keycloak

Fix static checks

Co-authored-by: Natsu <34879762+hoalongnatsu@users.noreply.github.com>
apache#41793)

(cherry picked from commit 83ba17f)

Co-authored-by: Jens Scheffler <95105677+jscheffl@users.noreply.github.com>
@joaopamaral joaopamaral marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2024 17:17
@potiuk
Copy link
Owner

potiuk commented Aug 27, 2024

Maybe you can ust directry make cherry-pick/PR to v2-10-test in a separate PR ? It would be much clearer - I see several commits and it's not clear which one is part /isn't part of it.

@joaopamaral
Copy link
Author

@potiuk, I've created the PR to v2-10-test here apache#41809

@potiuk
Copy link
Owner

potiuk commented Aug 28, 2024

Merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants