Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance Datadog Integration Docs: Add serviceMetric Resource #1502

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

phalbert
Copy link
Contributor

@phalbert phalbert commented Aug 16, 2024

Description

This pull request enhances the documentation for the Datadog integration by adding information about the new serviceMetric resource. This resource allows users to fetch specific metrics from Datadog using a variety of filters, providing more flexibility and control over the data ingested into Port.

Key Changes:

  • New Section on serviceMetric Resource: A new section is added to the Datadog integration documentation, explaining the purpose and usage of the serviceMetric resource.
  • Configuration Examples: Clear configuration examples are provided, demonstrating how to use the datadogSelector to filter metrics based on metric, env, service, and timeframe.
  • Explanation of Mapping: The mapping between the Datadog response and the Port entity is explained, including the use of properties like __query_id, __query, __metric, __env, and __service.

Updated docs pages

Please also include the path for the updated docs

  • Datadog Ocean (build-your-software-catalog/sync-data-to-catalog/apm-alerting/datadog)

Copy link

This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more).

Access this pull request here: https://pr-1502.d2ngvl90zqbob8.amplifyapp.com

@Tankilevitch Tankilevitch merged commit 227efa8 into main Aug 19, 2024
4 checks passed
@Tankilevitch Tankilevitch deleted the PORT-9179-add-service-metrics-to-datadog branch August 19, 2024 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants