System Editor

[Web-eWorks]

They say a picture is worth a thousand words, but I've been working on this branch with every scrap of my free time for the last month+ so let's skip straight to the video.

2023-09-08.01-29-05.mp4

(Background music: "Eternity" by Stellardrone.)

This PR is currently in feature-complete state and waiting on #5622 and #5623 to be merged before being rebased and reviewed. I'm opening it now because it needs a lot of testing - this is intended to be the tool that all future modders and content creators use to define custom systems.

./build/editor --system is the editor invocation on linux systems; I leave it up to the CMake wizards to figure out how to translate that to Windows.

Testing Needed

Anyone even mildly able to compile from source is invited and encouraged to build this PR and try to use the tool to work on custom systems. This is a huge amount of new and changed code, and is replacing a large part of our current architecture and workflow for handling custom systems.

Use this tool to make new systems or improve randomly generated ones, and report back here with the results. If you run into a bug, please attach a zipped copy of the system definition you were working on and any necessary reproduction steps to this issue.

I specifically would like some poor brave soul to attempt to use it to convert all of our existing custom system definition files to the new JSON-based format the tool saves. This includes everything in data/systems/custom/ that isn't a "star record file" like data/systems/02_local_stars.lua.

At this stage, I believe the system editor will load a Lua custom system definition the exact same way the game loads it, so please verify that by loading the generated system JSON back into the tool and checking against a running copy of the game.

NOTE: If testing the editor, please check to ensure the UndoStack does not get corrupted (entry depth > 1). If you hold ALT, the undo stack window will give you a button to "reset" the current undo entry for easy testing.

Review Process

This is a huge PR, to put it bluntly. I don't expect any kind of substantive review (though it is welcome if anyone has the time). Ideally, a number of users test this PR and that functions as the review process, though if none come forward I'll most likely merge this PR in a few weeks and we can proceed with our (usual) process of "it's tested in master instead".

[impaktor]

Fantastic work!

[impaktor]

Hmm, this doesn't build for me. I tried removing the build dir, and re-do it. Not sure what the error is, as there's a lot of warnings.
Linker error?

/home/karlf/usr/src/pioneer/src/core/StringUtils.h:162:30: warning:   ‘SplitString* SplitString::iter::m_parent’ [-Wreorder]
  162 |                 SplitString *m_parent;
      |                              ^~~~~~~~
/home/karlf/usr/src/pioneer/src/core/StringUtils.h:131:17: warning:   when initialized here [-Wreorder]
  131 |                 iter() : m_str(), m_parent(nullptr) {};
      |                 ^~~~
In file included from /home/karlf/usr/src/pioneer/src/utils.h:8,
                 from /home/karlf/usr/src/pioneer/src/lua/core/Sandbox.cpp:8:
/home/karlf/usr/src/pioneer/src/core/StringUtils.h: In constructor ‘SplitString::iter::iter()’:
/home/karlf/usr/src/pioneer/src/core/StringUtils.h:163:34: warning: ‘SplitString::iter::m_str’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder]
  163 |                 std::string_view m_str;
      |                                  ^~~~~
/home/karlf/usr/src/pioneer/src/core/StringUtils.h:162:30: warning:   ‘SplitString* SplitString::iter::m_parent’ [-Wreorder]
  162 |                 SplitString *m_parent;
      |                              ^~~~~~~~
/home/karlf/usr/src/pioneer/src/core/StringUtils.h:131:17: warning:   when initialized here [-Wreorder]
  131 |                 iter() : m_str(), m_parent(nullptr) {};
      |                 ^~~~
[ 96%] Linking CXX static library libpioneer-lua.a
[ 96%] Built target pioneer-lua
make: *** [Makefile:136: all] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/home/karlf/usr/src/pioneer/build'

[Web-eWorks]

Those warnings are harmless; the log fragment you've posted does not seem to include an error. Will be coming back to this soon (my break from system editor code was rather over-productive...) and will look at that error + finish blocking PRs.

[Web-eWorks]

I've (finally) implemented loading systems from JSON as part of the "normal" Galaxy startup flow, and also improved our .json.patch format handling to allow modifying array elements via special JSON Pointer syntax without completely overwriting the entire array. Shown here is a test "mod" file which makes some minor (and major) changes to the Sol system's JSON definition.

You probably shouldn't try to add or remove a system body via the JSON patch mechanism; it's not what it's intended for. However, this will allow mods to make minor edits to a custom system, without needing to redistribute (a copy of) the entire custom system definition.

[Web-eWorks]

Marking this PR as ready for review. I still have two minor things to implement (setting body heightmap file, and spaceport model name) and I consider this PR in a good state to merge.

I need to do a minor bit of cleanup on the git history (CMakeUserPresets.json snuck in somehow, it's supposed to be in .gitignore) but feel free to pick apart the code if interested!

[impaktor]

Tried "new system", looks like there are elements missing / not shown:

Tried it again, and now I get list:

Then I tried to "Open file", I see the open file window for 1 frame. I assumed it was some wonkyness due to my tiling window manager, so tried it again from a floating group (i.e. not in tiling mode anymore), but same.

I also, without any system loaded, you can still do edit -> sort bodies, which crashes the window.

The windows in the window menu seem to work (they're floating within the frame of the system editor window).

[Web-eWorks]

All of the issues mentioned in your comment (except the native file dialog issue) should be fixed. Unsure what's going on with the file dialogs, but that's nothing I have any ability to affect from within Pioneer's code, as the editor uses a third-party library wrapping platform-specific facilities to request an OS file picker.

[Web-eWorks]

I've added support for setting body heightmaps and explicitly specifying station models (for the total of 4 bodies across all our custom systems that use either of those features). I'd like to migrate those properties (and more) to a PropertyMap instead, but that's not within the scope of this PR and can be done separately without necessitating a savegame bump.

[Web-eWorks]

Finally, I've adjusted spaceport generation to reduce the existing behavior of generating all spaceports in a nice orderly line around a polar orbit of the parent body (which included surface stations for legacy reasons).

I've also significantly reduced the worst-case number of stations that can be generated around a body; we had a truly ridiculous number of stations that were generated in some systems, well beyond what could be useful even with our goals for improved in-system gameplay opportunities. This also means that a tiny asteroid with a 200-500km radius will no longer be generated with six surface ports crammed together.

The end result is that generated starports around a high-population body go from looking like this:

To this:

[fluffyfreak]

reduce the existing behavior of generating all spaceports in a nice orderly line around a polar orbit of the parent body

That doesn't seem like behaviour that I remember existing 🤔 when did that start?

[Web-eWorks]

when did that start?

Well before I started working on this PR. It wasn't very visible if you weren't looking for it specifically, but in problem systems with 4+ stations or surface ports it was very obvious. I think it was related to the hard-coded matrix math for setting the orbital plane; I've replaced most instances of that with a parameter-based helper which produces much more readable and intuitive results.

[Web-eWorks]

Per discussion on IRC, the above issue with missing file open dialog was due to impaktor's very stripped-down system missing all of zenity, kdialog, or matedialog to allow the program to open a native file dialog. At least one of those programs is available on all linux distros out of the box in my experience, unless the user has explicitly chosen to install nothing but their own user-provided list of packages.

Since that issue has been resolved as "user error" (:stuck_out_tongue:) I'm merging this PR.