Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

auto: code-gen upgrade handler v27 #8724

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

osmo-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Update report

  • Created a new empty upgrade handler
  • Increased E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in Makefile by 1
  • Increased OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in .vscode/launch.json by 1

@osmo-bot osmo-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 23, 2024 09:58
@osmo-bot osmo-bot added C:app-wiring Changes to the app folder C:e2e T:auto Automatic items V:state/breaking State machine breaking PR labels Sep 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the versioning for the Osmosis application from v26 to v27 across multiple files. This includes modifications to environment variables, upgrade management, and the introduction of new files that define the upgrade process for v27. The updates ensure that the application can handle the new version and its associated functionalities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.vscode/launch.json, Makefile Updated version variable from "v26" to "v27" for the end-to-end upgrade process.
app/app.go Added v27 to the Upgrades slice, including the necessary import statement.
app/upgrades/v27/constants.go Introduced UpgradeName constant and Upgrade variable for the v27 upgrade details.
app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go Added CreateUpgradeHandler function to manage the upgrade process and execute migrations.
tests/e2e/containers/config.go Updated version tags for repositories from "25.0.0" to "26.0.0" for consistency with upgrades.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Application
    participant UpgradeHandler
    participant ModuleManager

    User->>Application: Request upgrade to v27
    Application->>UpgradeHandler: Create upgrade handler
    UpgradeHandler->>ModuleManager: Run migrations
    ModuleManager-->>UpgradeHandler: Return migration results
    UpgradeHandler-->>Application: Complete upgrade process
    Application-->>User: Upgrade to v27 successful
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 133d623 and 02ab89f.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • .vscode/launch.json (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • app/app.go (2 hunks)
  • app/upgrades/v27/constants.go (1 hunks)
  • app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
  • tests/e2e/containers/config.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint
app/app.go

[failure] 137-137:
could not import github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27 (-: # github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27

app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go

[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement (typecheck)


[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement) (typecheck)

GitHub Check: go (00)
app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go

[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement

GitHub Check: osmosisd-darwin-amd64
app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go

[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement

GitHub Check: test
app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go

[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement

Additional comments not posted (13)
app/upgrades/v27/constants.go (4)

1-7: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct.

The package name v27 is appropriate for this upgrade file. The imports are relevant and correctly reference the previous version (v26) of Osmosis, which is expected when defining an upgrade.


9-10: LGTM: UpgradeName constant is well-defined.

The UpgradeName constant is correctly set to "v27", which aligns with the upgrade version. The accompanying comment provides clear documentation about its purpose.


12-19: LGTM: Upgrade variable is correctly structured.

The Upgrade variable is well-defined with the appropriate fields for the upgrade process. The empty slices for Added and Deleted stores indicate that no store changes are planned for this upgrade, which is fine if intended.


14-14: Verify the CreateUpgradeHandler function.

The CreateUpgradeHandler is referenced here but not defined in this file. Please ensure that this function is properly implemented in another file within the v27 package.

Run the following script to verify the existence of the CreateUpgradeHandler function:

Verification successful

CreateUpgradeHandler is properly implemented in the v27 package.
The CreateUpgradeHandler function is defined in app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go and correctly follows the standard implementation pattern for upgrade handlers by executing migrations.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of CreateUpgradeHandler function in the v27 package.

# Test: Search for the CreateUpgradeHandler function definition in the v27 package.
# Expect: A function definition for CreateUpgradeHandler.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func CreateUpgradeHandler($$$) $$$'

Length of output: 94827


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: View the contents of the CreateUpgradeHandler function in the v27 package.
cat app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go

Length of output: 846

app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go (3)

3-10: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and necessary.

The imported packages are correctly chosen for implementing the upgrade handler. They include essential types and modules from Cosmos SDK and Osmosis.


18-27: LGTM: Implementation follows best practices, but verify if additional upgrade logic is needed.

The implementation correctly runs migrations before applying any other state changes, which is a good practice. However, it's worth noting that there are no other state changes or upgrades being performed in this handler.

Please verify if any additional upgrade logic specific to v27 needs to be implemented in this handler. If not, consider adding a comment explaining why no additional changes are needed for this upgrade.

To assist in verification, you can search for TODOs or FIXMEs related to v27 upgrades:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for TODOs or FIXMEs related to v27 upgrades

rg --type go "TODO|FIXME.*v27.*upgrade"

If there are no results, it might indicate that no additional logic is required for this upgrade.

Tools
GitHub Check: go (00)

[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement

GitHub Check: osmosisd-darwin-amd64

[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement

GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint

[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement (typecheck)


[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement) (typecheck)

GitHub Check: test

[failure] 18-18:
cannot use func(ctx sdk.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, fromVM module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) {…} (value of type func(ctx "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types".Context, plan "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".Plan, fromVM "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap) ("github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/module".VersionMap, error)) as "cosmossdk.io/x/upgrade/types".UpgradeHandler value in return statement


12-17: Verify the return type of CreateUpgradeHandler.

The function signature looks correct, but static analysis tools have flagged a potential type mismatch for the return value. This could be due to changes in the SDK version or a minor type discrepancy.

Please verify that the upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler type is compatible with the returned function type. You may need to check the SDK version being used and ensure it matches the expected types.

To assist in verification, you can run the following command to check the definition of upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler:

If the definitions don't match, you may need to update either the import or the function signature to resolve the type mismatch.

tests/e2e/containers/config.go (3)

27-27: LGTM: Version update for previousVersionOsmoTag

The update of previousVersionOsmoTag from "25.0.0-alpine" to "26.0.0-alpine" is correct and aligns with the PR objectives of upgrading to v27. This change ensures that the previous version is properly set for upgrade testing.


Line range hint 1-85: Summary: Version updates look good, but verify consistency across the project

The changes in this file correctly update the previous version tags from v25 to v26, which is consistent with an upgrade to v27. However, there's a potential inconsistency between these changes and the PR objectives:

  1. The PR objectives mention increasing E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile by 1.
  2. The changes in this file suggest an upgrade from v25 to v26, not v26 to v27 as implied in the PR objectives.

To ensure project-wide consistency, please verify the following:

  1. Check if the E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile has been updated correctly.
  2. Confirm that all other relevant files (e.g., .vscode/launch.json) have been updated to reflect the correct version numbers.
  3. Review the PR description to ensure it accurately describes the changes being made.

You can use the following script to check for version references across the project:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version references across the project

echo "Checking Makefile for E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION:"
grep -n "E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION" Makefile

echo "\nChecking .vscode/launch.json for OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION:"
grep -n "OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION" .vscode/launch.json

echo "\nChecking for other version references:"
grep -r -n "v2[567]" --include="*.go" --include="*.json" --include="Makefile" .

This will help ensure that all version references are consistent throughout the project.


30-30: LGTM: Version update for previousVersionInitTag, but verify consistency

The update of previousVersionInitTag from "25.0.0" to "26.0.0" is correct and aligns with the PR objectives of upgrading to v27. This change ensures that the previous version is properly set for upgrade testing.

However, there's a potential inconsistency to note:

  • The PR objectives mention increasing E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile by 1.
  • The changes in this file suggest an upgrade from v25 to v26, not v26 to v27 as implied in the PR objectives.

Please verify if this inconsistency is intentional or if additional changes are needed. You can use the following script to check the E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile:

Verification successful

Confirmed: Version update for previousVersionInitTag is correct and consistent

The update of previousVersionInitTag from "25.0.0" to "26.0.0" is correct and aligns with the PR objectives of upgrading to v27. This change ensures that the previous version is properly set for upgrade testing.

The E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the Makefile and OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in the launch.json file are both set to "v27", which is consistent with the upgrade process. The change in this file is updating the previous version tag, which should indeed be v26 when upgrading to v27.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in Makefile
grep -n "E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION" Makefile

Length of output: 245902

Makefile (1)

47-47: LGTM: E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION updated correctly.

The update of E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION from "v26" to "v27" is consistent with the PR objectives for creating a new upgrade handler version.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following command to check for any other occurrences of "v26" that might need updating:

This will help identify any other files that might need to be updated to maintain consistency with this version change.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION Updated Correctly and No Unintended v26 References Found.

All instances of v26 identified are within dependency paths and do not impact the project's upgrade consistency.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for "v26" in all files, excluding the .git directory and binary files
rg --type-not binary --glob '!.git' 'v26'

Length of output: 72


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for "v26" in all files, excluding the .git directory and binary files
rg -I --glob '!.git' 'v26'

Length of output: 164765

.vscode/launch.json (1)

50-50: LGTM: Version update for E2E upgrade testing

The change from "v26" to "v27" for the OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION environment variable is consistent with the PR objectives. This update is crucial for ensuring that the E2E tests run against the correct version during the upgrade process.

To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of "v26" that might need updating:

This will help identify any other files that might need to be updated to maintain consistency with this version change.

Verification successful

To ensure consistency across the project and verify if there are any other occurrences of the OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION variable that might need updating, let's run the following script:

This script will help us identify any other places where the OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION variable is used and might need to be updated to maintain consistency with the version change.


LGTM: E2E upgrade version update is consistent

The change from "v26" to "v27" for the OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION environment variable in .vscode/launch.json is consistent with the project's upgrade process. This variable is used in E2E tests and makefiles, and updating it is a necessary step for testing the new upgrade.

To ensure a smooth upgrade process:

  • Review the E2E tests to confirm they're prepared for the v27 upgrade.
  • Update any hardcoded version references in the test files if necessary.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of "v26" in the project

# Search for "v26" in all files, excluding the .git directory and binary files
rg --type-add 'ignore:*.{so,o,a,dylib,dll,exe}' --type-not ignore -i "v26" .

Length of output: 256191


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION in all files
rg "OSMOSIS_E2E_UPGRADE_VERSION" .

Length of output: 1659

app/app.go (1)

195-195: LGTM: Upgrade slice updated correctly

The addition of v27.Upgrade to the Upgrades slice is correct and necessary for registering the new upgrade with the application.

To ensure the integration is complete, please run the application's test suite, paying particular attention to upgrade-related tests. This will help verify that the new v27 upgrade is properly integrated into the system.

@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@
v24 "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v24"
v25 "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v25"
v26 "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v26"
v27 "github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

v27 Upgrade struct not found

The v27 upgrade package is missing the required Upgrade struct definition.

  • File: app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go

Please ensure that the Upgrade struct is properly defined to register the new upgrade.

Analysis chain

Verify the v27 upgrade package

The addition of the v27 upgrade import looks correct and follows the established pattern for introducing new upgrades.

To ensure the v27 upgrade package is properly implemented, please run the following verification:

This script will check for the existence of the v27 upgrade package and its basic structure. If any issues are found, please address them before merging this change.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence and basic structure of the v27 upgrade package
if [ -d "app/upgrades/v27" ]; then
  echo "v27 upgrade directory exists"
  if [ -f "app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go" ]; then
    echo "v27 upgrades.go file exists"
    grep -q "var Upgrade = Upgrade{" "app/upgrades/v27/upgrades.go" && echo "v27 Upgrade struct found" || echo "v27 Upgrade struct not found"
  else
    echo "v27 upgrades.go file not found"
  fi
else
  echo "v27 upgrade directory not found"
fi

Length of output: 334

Tools
GitHub Check: Run golangci-lint

[failure] 137-137:
could not import github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27 (-: # github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/v26/app/upgrades/v27

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:app-wiring Changes to the app folder C:e2e T:auto Automatic items T:build V:state/breaking State machine breaking PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants