Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add EPL-2.0 to allowed licenses #148

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion licenses/license-engine.sh
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ ALLOWED_LICENSES=(
'WTFPL OR ISC'
'(WTFPL OR MIT)'
'(MIT OR WTFPL)'
'LGPL-3.0-or-later' # Requires only that modifications to LGPL-protected libraries are published under a GPL-compatible license which is not the case at Ory
'LGPL-3.0-or-later' # Requires only that modifications to LGPL-protected libraries are published under a GPL-compatible license which is not the case at Ory,
'EPL-2.0'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is EPL 2.0?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From wikipedia:

The Eclipse Public License is designed to be a business-friendly free software license, and features weaker copyleft provisions than licenses such as the GNU General Public License (GPL).[7] The receiver of EPL-licensed programs can use, modify, copy and distribute the work and modified versions, in some cases being obligated to release their own changes.[8]

I am not an expert in licenses, but to me, it seems similar to the LGPL licenses.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, it does have copyleft though. Is there an alternative library? I couldn't find EPL-2.0, only EPL-1.0 on tldr legal :/

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mermaid-js/mermaid#5043 okay seems like this is an issue, and we're gonna be stuck on specific mermaid versions.

I do think for docs, it would be fine to allow EPL, but for the Ory Network not. I'll try to find a mermaid version that passes license checks first.

)

# These modules don't work with the current license checkers
Expand Down
Loading