Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add index.query.max_nested_depth fix #6346 #6347

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor

@mkhludnev mkhludnev commented Feb 3, 2024

Description

Document index.query.max_nested_depth setting.

Issues Resolved

Closes #6346

this documents 2.x change opensearch-project/OpenSearch#11670

Checklist

  • By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and subject to the Developers Certificate of Origin.
    For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @mkhludnev! A small change and this PR will be ready to merge. Is this for 2.12?

@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws self-assigned this Feb 5, 2024
Co-authored-by: kolchfa-aws <105444904+kolchfa-aws@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>
@mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkhludnev commented Feb 5, 2024

Thank you, @mkhludnev! A small change and this PR will be ready to merge.

Appreciate!

Is this for 2.12?

depends on opensearch-project/OpenSearch#11670

Copy link
Collaborator

@natebower natebower left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should "20" and "1" be in code font? Otherwise, LGTM.

@mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should "20" and "1" be in code font? Otherwise, LGTM.

Fully agree. But neither is numbers around follow this convention.

@hdhalter hdhalter added 6 - Done but waiting to merge PR: The work is done and ready to merge v2.12.0 release-notes PR: Include this PR in the automated release notes and removed release-notes PR: Include this PR in the automated release notes v2.12.0 labels Feb 7, 2024
@reta
Copy link
Contributor

reta commented Feb 10, 2024

@kolchfa-aws this is going to land in 2.13.0

@mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Still little bit puzzled.

mkhludnev and others added 3 commits February 13, 2024 21:57
Co-authored-by: Andriy Redko <drreta@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Khludnev <mkhludnev@users.noreply.github.com>
@mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done with applying suggestion for 2.13. Still not clear how we remember to change documentation for default for 3.x corresponding to opensearch-project/OpenSearch#11670?

@hdhalter
Copy link
Contributor

Done with applying suggestion for 2.13. Still not clear how we remember to change documentation for default for 3.x corresponding to opensearch-project/OpenSearch#11670?

Thanks, @mkhludnev ! You can create a new documentation issue that describes the changes for 3.0 and points to the change in functionality, or go straight to a PR. We will label it as '3.0'.

@mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great @hdhalter. After this is merged I spin 3.0 PR.

@hdhalter hdhalter added release-notes PR: Include this PR in the automated release notes 4 - Doc review PR: Doc review in progress and removed 6 - Done but waiting to merge PR: The work is done and ready to merge labels Mar 13, 2024
@kolchfa-aws
Copy link
Collaborator

@mkhludnev Is this PR ready to merge for 2.13?

@mkhludnev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mkhludnev Is this PR ready to merge for 2.13?

I think so opensearch-project/OpenSearch#12286 (comment)

@hdhalter hdhalter added 6 - Done but waiting to merge PR: The work is done and ready to merge and removed 4 - Doc review PR: Doc review in progress labels Mar 18, 2024
@hdhalter hdhalter changed the title Document index.query.max_nested_depth fix #6346 Add index.query.max_nested_depth fix #6346 Mar 18, 2024
@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws merged commit 9280438 into opensearch-project:main Mar 19, 2024
4 checks passed
@hdhalter hdhalter added 3 - Done Issue is done/complete and removed 6 - Done but waiting to merge PR: The work is done and ready to merge labels Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Done Issue is done/complete release-notes PR: Include this PR in the automated release notes v2.13.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[DOC] describe index.query.max_nested_depth setting
5 participants