[CVE-2021-23807] Bump jsonpointer from 4.1.0 to 5.0.1

[joshuarrrr]

Description

Bump jsonpointer from 4.1.0 to 5.0.1

Does not appear to be a breaking change

Issues Resolved

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23807

Check List

• All tests pass
  • yarn test:jest
  • yarn test:jest_integration
  • yarn test:ftr
• New functionality includes testing.
• New functionality has been documented.
• Update CHANGELOG.md
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3535 (8c6854c) into 1.x (ba11c44) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              1.x    #3535      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.49%   67.45%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        3044     3044              
  Lines       58696    58696              
  Branches     8902     8902              
==========================================
- Hits        39615    39591      -24     
- Misses      16932    16952      +20     
- Partials     2149     2153       +4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux	67.45% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Windows	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/dev/build/lib/get_build_number.ts	57.14% <0.00%> (-42.86%)	⬇️
packages/osd-cross-platform/src/path.ts	48.83% <0.00%> (-37.21%)	⬇️
...ges/osd-apm-config-loader/src/config.test.mocks.ts	91.30% <0.00%> (-8.70%)	⬇️
src/dev/build/lib/config.ts	79.41% <0.00%> (-5.89%)	⬇️
src/setup_node_env/harden/child_process.js	84.61% <0.00%> (-3.85%)	⬇️
...ic/application/models/sense_editor/sense_editor.ts	64.88% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[zhongnansu]

Np: Would it be better if we add the github issues, or CVE links to the PR description?

[joshuarrrr]

Np: Would it be better if we add the github issues, or CVE links to the PR description?

updated