Hammer/adapter lift request qos

[luca-della-vedova]

What's new

Ported from deploy/hammer, make the lift request qos transient local, having this publisher volatile and the subscription on rmf_ros2 transient local means communication does not take place and the lift request widget does not actually work.

Self-checks

• I have prototyped this new feature (if necessary) on Figma
• I'm familiar with and follow this Typescript guideline
• I added unit-tests for new components
• I tried testing edge cases
• I tested the behavior of the components that interact with the backend, with an e2e test

Discussion

I tested this locally and without the fix the widget doesn't work, with it requests are respected.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.48%. Comparing base (7dfbbca) to head (62c5ba3).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #930   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   50.48%   50.48%           
=======================================
  Files         283      283           
  Lines        7179     7179           
  Branches      981      981           
=======================================
  Hits         3624     3624           
  Misses       3407     3407           
  Partials      148      148           

Flag	Coverage Δ
api-server	78.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[aaronchongth]

LGTM