Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: clarify dgram socket.send() multi-buffer support #5130

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mcollina
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina commented Feb 7, 2016

Fixes: #5124

@Trott @eljefedelrodeodeljefe @silverwind @nodejs/documentation Let me know if I need to change this more.

@eljefedelrodeodeljefe
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Good step in docs. Since tbh I was just using Buffers, not knowing any better :) Thanks.

The `buf` argument is a [`Buffer`] object containing the message. The `offset`
and `length` specify the offset within the `Buffer` where the message begins
and the number of bytes in the message, respectively. With messages that
The `msg` argument containins the message the message to be sent.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the message the message -> the message

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Feb 7, 2016

One small typographical fix but LGTM otherwise.

@r-52 r-52 added dgram Issues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. lts-watch-v4.x labels Feb 7, 2016
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Feb 7, 2016

LGTM
@mcollina ... this is related to your recently landed semver-minor adding the multiple buffer support right?

@mcollina
Copy link
Member Author

mcollina commented Feb 7, 2016

@jasnell yes.

Should I flag it anyhow in the commit message?

Anyway, I've updated the typo. Any other fix?

@mcollina mcollina added semver-minor PRs that contain new features and should be released in the next minor version. and removed lts-watch-v4.x labels Feb 7, 2016
@mcollina
Copy link
Member Author

mcollina commented Feb 7, 2016

I've removed the LTS flag and added the semver-minor label.

Fixes: nodejs#5124
See: nodejs#4374
PR-URL: nodejs#5130
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Feb 7, 2016

This actual doc change does not need to be labeled semver-minor, we just need to make sure it doesn't land in v4

@jasnell jasnell added dont-land-on-v4.x and removed semver-minor PRs that contain new features and should be released in the next minor version. labels Feb 7, 2016
mcollina added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2016
Fixes: #5124
See: #4374
PR-URL: #5130
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@mcollina
Copy link
Member Author

mcollina commented Feb 8, 2016

Landed as 76bc4c7.

@mcollina mcollina closed this Feb 8, 2016
@mcollina mcollina deleted the new-dgram-docs branch February 8, 2016 16:17
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2016
Fixes: #5124
See: #4374
PR-URL: #5130
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2016
Fixes: #5124
See: #4374
PR-URL: #5130
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
scovetta pushed a commit to scovetta/node that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2016
Fixes: nodejs#5124
See: nodejs#4374
PR-URL: nodejs#5130
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dgram Issues and PRs related to the dgram subsystem / UDP. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants