Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

os: avoid unnecessary usage of var #42563

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2022
Merged

os: avoid unnecessary usage of var #42563

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2022

Conversation

VoltrexKeyva
Copy link
Member

The var keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the let keyword for variable declarations.

@VoltrexKeyva
os: avoid unnecessary usage of var
01921f1 
The `var` keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the `let` keyword for variable declarations.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. os Issues and PRs related to the os subsystem. labels Apr 1, 2022
tniessen
tniessen approved these changes Apr 1, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@tniessen tniessen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm surprised to see we still have some var declarations (assuming there are no performance edge cases here, but I think V8 fixed those years ago).

@RaisinTen
Copy link
Contributor

RaisinTen commented Apr 1, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Running the os benchmarks to be sure because we have a benchmark test for

node/benchmark/os/networkInterfaces.js

Line 13 in d484cba

networkInterfaces();

which we are touching in this PR and we still have comments like

node/lib/internal/async_hooks.js

Lines 197 to 198 in d484cba

// Using var here instead of let because "for (var ...)" is faster than let.
// Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30380#issuecomment-552948364

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/1115/

                                confidence improvement accuracy (*)   (**)  (***)
os/cpus.js n=30000                              0.00 %       ±0.68% ±0.91% ±1.18%
os/loadavg.js n=5000000                        -0.40 %       ±1.17% ±1.55% ±2.02%
os/networkInterfaces.js n=10000                -2.51 %       ±4.75% ±6.32% ±8.23%

I guess, we can replace all the vars with let/consts.

RaisinTen
RaisinTen approved these changes Apr 1, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@RaisinTen RaisinTen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@marsonya marsonya added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. and removed author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. labels Apr 1, 2022
@Trott Trott mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2022
Closed
@VoltrexKeyva VoltrexKeyva added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 2, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Apr 2, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/43263/

@RaisinTen RaisinTen added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Apr 2, 2022
@VoltrexKeyva VoltrexKeyva removed the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Apr 2, 2022
@Trott Trott added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Apr 3, 2022
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Apr 3, 2022

A bit of an aside, but I've re-added the needs-ci label.

It's perhaps a bit confusingly named, but the needs-ci label is there for the commit queue automation. It tells the automation that this is a PR that should land only if there is a passing Jenkins CI run. It's not a label letting other people know that we need a CI run. So it should generally not be manually removed (unless it was incorrectly placed on a PR in the first place.)

Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node-core-utils/blob/919ec3b784a2589aa88a1b2629b98d57283555a4/lib/pr_checker.js#L431-L438

@Trott Trott added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Apr 3, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Apr 3, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit b5f0b49 into nodejs:master Apr 3, 2022
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in b5f0b49

@VoltrexKeyva VoltrexKeyva deleted the avoid-var branch April 3, 2022 16:34
juanarbol pushed a commit to juanarbol/node that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2022
@VoltrexKeyva @juanarbol
os: avoid unnecessary usage of var
0fcb067 
The `var` keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the `let` keyword for variable declarations.

PR-URL: nodejs#42563
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This was referenced Apr 5, 2022
Closed
Merged
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2022
@VoltrexKeyva @juanarbol
os: avoid unnecessary usage of var
0bd9d9e 
The `var` keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the `let` keyword for variable declarations.

PR-URL: #42563
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
xtx1130 pushed a commit to xtx1130/node that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2022
@VoltrexKeyva @xtx1130
os: avoid unnecessary usage of var
966f02c 
The `var` keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the `let` keyword for variable declarations.

PR-URL: nodejs#42563
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2022
@VoltrexKeyva @juanarbol
os: avoid unnecessary usage of var
2cf6a05 
The `var` keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the `let` keyword for variable declarations.

PR-URL: #42563
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@juanarbol juanarbol mentioned this pull request May 31, 2022
Closed
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
@VoltrexKeyva @danielleadams
os: avoid unnecessary usage of var
6216279 
The `var` keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the `let` keyword for variable declarations.

PR-URL: #42563
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2022
@VoltrexKeyva @targos
os: avoid unnecessary usage of var
1161ff8 
The `var` keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the `let` keyword for variable declarations.

PR-URL: #42563
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2022
@VoltrexKeyva @targos
os: avoid unnecessary usage of var
e7899ba 
The `var` keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the `let` keyword for variable declarations.

PR-URL: #42563
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Aug 3, 2022
Merged
guangwong pushed a commit to noslate-project/node that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2022
@VoltrexKeyva @guangwong
os: avoid unnecessary usage of var
a2a97b3 
The `var` keyword is known to be problematic and is not needed here,
so better to use the `let` keyword for variable declarations.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#42563
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Akhil Marsonya <akhil.marsonya27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

@Trott Trott Trott approved these changes

@benjamingr benjamingr benjamingr approved these changes

@lpinca lpinca lpinca approved these changes

@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes

@tniessen tniessen tniessen approved these changes

@marsonya marsonya marsonya approved these changes

@RaisinTen RaisinTen RaisinTen approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. os Issues and PRs related to the os subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
10 participants
@VoltrexKeyva @RaisinTen @nodejs-github-bot @Trott @jasnell @benjamingr @lpinca @cjihrig @tniessen @marsonya