Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: skip tests with common.skip #11585

Closed

Conversation

thefourtheye
Copy link
Contributor

The common.skip function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Feb 27, 2017
Copy link
Member

@gibfahn gibfahn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch!

@hiroppy
Copy link
Member

hiroppy commented Mar 1, 2017

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: #11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 1, 2017

Landed in 5d4273d

@jasnell jasnell closed this Mar 1, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: #11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
@evanlucas evanlucas mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2017
@thefourtheye thefourtheye deleted the skip-with-common-skip branch March 13, 2017 08:44
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: #11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: #11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2017
andrew749 pushed a commit to michielbaird/node that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2017
The `common.skip` function adds proper message in TAP format to skipped
tests. It is better not to have the message rewritten in the tests.

PR-URL: nodejs/node#11585
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants